PBS aired its first interview with Green Party candidate Jill Stein, but surprise surprise PBS censored Stein’s negative comments on Hillary Clinton and the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP).
This comes on the heels of PBS shutting down their comments section online, proving that Public Broadcasting isn’t so public, and is now shilling for the TPP and Hillary Clinton.
Although it’s normal for TV programs and producers to edit interviews, it’s interesting what they chose to air and cut out. As Matt Orfalea points out in the video below, “It’s common for TV to be cut for time. But where and what they cut shows what the narrative is that they’re trying to push.”
Jill Stein has been previously been censored by Google from even appearing as a Presidential candidate.
— Dr. Jill Stein (@DrJillStein) July 14, 2016
PBS cutting Stein’s comments on the TPP being NAFTA on steroids, and her criticism on Hillary Clinton shows what PBS’s agenda is.
Stein attacked Hillary Clinton for being a big proponent of fracking. Asked about the difference between Clinton and Trump, Stein had this to say about Hillary –
Jill Stein: I wouldn’t say there are no differences, but the differences are not enough to save your job because Hillary Clinton and now her transition director Ken Salazar, you know they’re big proponents of the Trans-Pacific Partnership. Which is basically NAFTA on steroids, and most observers believe that it will send our jobs overseas as well as undermine American sovereignty by bringing in these international tribunals that get to pass judgment on our laws, on our Public Health protections, on our worker protections.
So we can’t count on saving our jobs, saving our lives – one in three Americans now cannot afford Healthcare under Obamacare – or saving the planet because Hillary has been a big proponent of fracking as is Ken Salazar, her transition director.
Dr. Drew Pinsky was dropped from HLN, a sister network to CNN after five and half years, following his statement that Hillary Clinton has brain damage.
Dr. Drew spoke out on KABC radio regarding Hillary Clinton’s health, an interview that is now deleted from KABC’s website. Mark Dice breaks down Dr. Drew being fired for speaking out on Hillary’s health.
Here we have more of the mainstream media censoring stories about Hillary’s health and punishing anyone who dares to say anything truthful. Dr. Drew raised serious questions about Hillary’s health and mentioned her fall and subsequent concussion.
“When she hit her head, she had to wear these prism glasses when she came out. That is brain damage, and it’s affecting her balance. Now clearly, it hasn’t affected her cognition, but tell us a little more about that. That’s profound. And then number two, when they screened her for heart disease, again, they did an old-fashioned screen. It just seems like she’s getting care from somebody that she met in Arkansas when she was a kid, and you’ve got to wonder. You’ve got to wonder. It’s not so much that her health is a grave concern. It’s that the care she’s getting could make it a concern.” – Dr. Drew Pinsky
Dr. Drew also said that he was worried about Hillary’s overall health, saying she is receiving 1950’s health care.
His observation is accompanied by recent leaked emails by Wikileaks on Hillary’s health by a head aide discussing the drug Provogil, used to cure insomnia and other medical conditions including Parkinson’s and Alzheimer’s. An emails from Hillary aide Huma Abedin stated that Hillary is “often confused.”
Dr. Drew is known as “America’s Doctor.” He previously starred in the VH1 show Celebrity Rehab with Dr. Drew among his many television programs. Now, “Dr. Drew On Call” on HLN is being canceled because he dared to give his actual expert opinion on Hillary Clinton’s failing health.
Dr.Drew diagnosed her with Transverse Sinus Thrombosis, saying “she developed the very rare condition which is often associated with a stroke.” He also pointed out she is not taking modern day medications and he was gravely concerned about her health care, calling it bizarre.
“She developed a very rare condition called a Transverse Sinus Thrombosis, which is associated with a stroke, where the blood — It is not the usual blood clot under the brain at all. It is the veins that drain the cerebrospinal fluid. So, she had two clots in her leg, one clot in her brain — why? Why is this woman clotting like this. They put her on a medication called Coumadin, which is a great medicine Blood thinner, old fashioned. Not something I would put her on if she had that condition. It has to be monitored all the time. It is a higher risk for bleeding than in newer medication. Who is giving her Coumadin? On top that of that, she has an under active thyroid, common. But, she is being treated with armor thyroid, which is something I have not seen used since like the 70s. What’s wrong with her coagulation system? Has that been evaluated? And oh, by the way, Armour Thyroid associated rarely with hypercoagulability. So the very medicine the doctors are using may be causing this problem, and they’re using an old-fashioned medicine to treat it. What is going on with her health care? It’s bizarre. I got to tell you. Maybe they have reasons, but at a distance, it looks bizarre.” ~Dr. Drew.
Mayor Rick Ramsey of Walker, Louisiana has claimed the recent flood in his state was “man-made.”
No it wasn’t HAARP – it was negligence on the part of the state and federal government according to Mayor Ramsey, who talked to local CBS affiliate WAFB.
“I’ve been begging them for three-and-a-half years to give us more drainage under the interstate,” Mayor Ramsey said.
According to Ramsey, there was no drainage under the interstate and he’s been begging for three and a half years for the governments to fix it. The governments’ refusal to listen and provide the drainage caused the flooding according to Ramsey.
A six-foot tall concrete barrier that was put along I-12 when the interstate was expanded last year essentially put the city of Walker “into a bowl,” said Ramsey. “When the Amite River went up, it hit that wall. We have video evidence that shows the concrete barrier and water lapping over the north shore of the interstate and bone dry on the south of the interstate. They basically built a dam for Walker.”
When asked if a lawsuit would go anywhere, he expressed that the State of Louisiana was broke and that the federal government doesn’t respond to lawsuits.
“My guess is before it’s over there will be multiple insurance companies involved in this too, because they are going to be paying out billions of dollars in flood insurance claims to those fortunate enough to have flood insurance. But once they see the evidence and realize the flooding event was man made they will be joining,” said Ramsey.
“I think it’s 100% negligent. I don’t think there’s any doubt. I can give you an example of a house that was built in ’79 that got no water in the ’83 flood when they peaked it at the same level and got 6 ft of water this trip it was my house.”
Ramsey also stated that 75% of Walker was flooded by this tragedy.
“I have a report and it appears there is evidence that DOTD removed 1-2 barricades early Sunday morning when our water dropped 3 FT and then put the barricades back in place and if that can be confirmed that means they were aware of the problem but didn’t fix it.”
~Mayor Rick Ramsey, said.
The city of Walker, Louisiana needs your help. If you can’t pack your backs and head down there, here’s how you can donate to help those in need.
Julian Assange has promised to release documents that could bring down Hillary Clinton.
On Fox News the last two nights, Assange sensationally claimed that if the new information goes viral and catches fire it could swing the election.
When asked by Fox News host Megyn Kelly if Assange thought the information in Wikileaks possession could be a “game-changer” in the U.S. election he responded –
“I think it’s significant, you know, it depends on how it catches fire in the public and in the media,” – Julian Assange.
Assange also vowed that the information would be released before the November election.
Additionally he noted “thousands of pages of material” on the Clinton campaign would be released in batches leading up to the election. With it now being toward the end of August, that leaves September and October for Assange to keep his promise.
“People have a right to understand who it is they’re electing” Assange said. He added that the release will feature “a variety of different types of documents, from different types of institutions that are associated with the election campaign, some quite unexpected angles that are quite interesting, some even entertaining.”
Lets not forget that in addition to Wikileaks, Hillary has troubles with the FBI looking to prosecute her in New York state, with the IRS, and with possible charges from the newly found 15,000 emails the FBI is set to release. With growing speculation that Hillary is sick and with emails from Wikileaks talking about her aides researching a drug for “decision fatigue” called Provogil, used to treat Parkinson’s and sleepiness among other health conditions, Hillary is primed may could short circuit before the end of the campaign if she isn’t arrested from the massive forthcoming scandals.
Wikileaks has also tweeted out it will incorporate the 15,000 emails the FBI just recovered into their large database of Hillary’s emails.
Bombshell set to hit Clinton campaign as FBI recovers 14,900 deleted emails. We will incorporate them into: https://t.co/XcH75u3kbu
— WikiLeaks (@wikileaks) August 23, 2016
Assange was mysteriously targeted earlier in this week when an unknown intruder tried to break into the Ecuadorian embassy in London where he lives in asylum. With Assange holding so much information on the Clintons and the ninety and counting DEAD associates and enemies of the Clintons, does anyone question that Assange might have been next in that long body count of mysterious murders surrounding the Clintons?
It’s on record that Jerry Luther Parks was threatened then murdered. Bill Clinton sexually assaulted Kathleen Willey and many others, and then they were threatened too. Watch the Clinton Chronicles and learn the truth about America’s crime family the Clintons.
A lawyer representing Wikileaks has filed a formal complaint against the Associated Press over “breached ethical standards,” in publishing what many have called a “hit piece” against Julian Assange.
The complaint comes in response to an article titled “Private lives are exposed as Wikileaks spills its secrets,” by Raphael Satter. The article has been widely used by proponents of Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton to smear Wikileaks publisher Julian Assange.
In the story, Satter makes the stunning claim that the publisher’s mass-disclosures have included the personal information of sick children, rape victims and mental health patients.
The complaint letter, written by human rights and international criminal lawyer Melinda Taylor, asserts that the article “contained falsehoods and distortions, including the disingenuous claim that Wikileaks had been contacted and given the opportunity to address the substance of the article’s claims.”
Taylor asserts that Satter did not attempt to contact Assange, and instead contacted her late in the evening — only seven hours before the story went to press. She explains speaking briefly with Satter in an email exchange, where he informed her that the story would be published “soon,” urging a quick response.
During the conversation, Satter explained that he had found emails that appeared to contain private details. When asked by Taylor if he could provide specific details so that she could forward them on to Assange, the journalist declined claiming it would be a violation of the individual’s privacy. The article Satter published the next day however, contained the details he claimed to be trying to protect.
“I responded that if this was the case, then publishing an article on such matters would only serve to draw increased attention to the matter. This would in fact intentionally publicise information on individual cases that AP considered to be private,” Taylor wrote.
“I further informed Mr. Satter that I have worked in the area of war crimes, genocide and rape for over 17 years at international criminal courts, and that one of the fundamental rules of victim protection is that if there has been a disclosure of information that could be private or protected, the parties are absolutely forbidden from referring to, or drawing attention to such a disclosure in public. Indeed, such secondary disclosure can be more damaging than inadvertent disclosures, which are often overlooked or ignored by the public.”
Satter simply responded by saying that the same holds true for national security issues.
By this time it was getting quite late, but Satter had promised to email Taylor the details within 10 minutes. He did not send the email until over an hour later, however, and by then Taylor, the mother of two young children who works full time, was asleep.
Satter had also not made it clear that when he said the article would be published “soon” he meant in just hours.
“It is thus clear that Mr. Satter provided WikiLeaks with no effective opportunity whatsoever to respond to claims, because no claims were put to Wikileaks itself before publication,” Taylor wrote.
AP has a strong guidebook for their “values and principles,” that states in no uncertain terms that journalists should never “publish a story that contains inaccuracies or distortions, or which portrays someone in a negative light without giving them a fair opportunity to respond.”
“We must make significant efforts to reach anyone who may be portrayed in a negative way in our stories, and we must give them a reasonable amount of time to get back to us before we move the story. What is ‘reasonable’ may depend on the urgency and competitiveness of the story. If we don’t reach the parties involved, we must explain in the story what efforts were made to do so,” the AP principles state.
Taylor further noted that since Satter had published a similar article in 2015, there was no urgency or competitiveness justifying publishing without giving Wikileaks the opportunity to respond.
The biggest issue with all of this, is that Wikileaks could have responded in an appropriate manner, possibly correcting the issue by removing the cables — if Satter had given them time to respond. Now that the story has been printed, removal of the cables would have a far more damaging Streisand Effect.
“Mr. Satter’s conduct plainly breaches AP standards for journalistic conduct, and appears to have been a reckless attempt to exploit privacy concerns for the purpose of launching an unfair attack on Mr. Assange and Wikileaks. Indeed, the partial nature of the article is evidenced by Mr. Satter’s use of offensive epithets – such as ‘exhacker’ to describe Mr. Assange. Such a description is both petty, and irresponsible, since it undermines Wikileaks’ First Amendment protections in the United States and its sources all over the world, including in Saudi Arabia, which is attempting to prosecute Mr. Assange for the publication,” Taylor asserts.
The letter concludes with a request for an investigation into Satter’s conduct — including his statements on Twitter which reveal “personal animus” against Assange, that the journalist is removed from covering stories relating to Wikileaks, and that AP publishes a response from Wikileaks.
So far, the AP has not yet responded.
Hillary Clinton offered chocolates to the press for being “cooperative” during a surprise stop at a coffee shop in Reno, NV.
When Clinton was asked by a journalist about allegations of “pay-for-play” at the Clinton Foundation and other scandals, her response was to ask, “want some chocolates?”
Several reporters took to twitter to express their dismay that Clinton offered them chocolate instead of answering their questions.
There were lots of attempts to get her to answer questions. Instead she told the press to try the chocolate. https://t.co/Dku4CBP2SN
— Jennifer Epstein (@jeneps) August 25, 2016
(We tried to ask questions, but Clinton's only response was to suggest we try the chocolate) https://t.co/tnHgeZuTaD
— Gabriel Debenedetti (@gdebenedetti) August 25, 2016
— Seth A. Richardson (@SethARichardson) August 25, 2016
It has now been 265 days since Clinton held a press conference – 100 more days and it’ll be a year of Clinton not answering real questions.
With the election in November, I can’t see any reason for Clinton to have a press conference now, with the press being so “cooperative.” Hillary easily avoids the press’s questions and why not – the DNC leaks proved they work for her.
When Hillary is challenged with actual facts about the scandals surrounding she and her husband, Bill Clinton, she dismisses the facts as “Right-Wing Conspiracies.”
What is worth noting is how she offered the press the chocolates, while calling them “wonderful,” “cooperative,” and “hard working.” That in itself is a form of poison. As a journalist you shouldn’t be cooperative, you should be hard hitting and ask the questions no one wants to ask. That’s what being a true investigative journalist is – like our own Luke Rudkowski.
It’s those moments where people are left dumb-founded and speechless due to your forth coming questions and research and catching them in a lie that make you a true journalist.
Exposing what the corrupt don’t want to be shown, shining light into the darkness—that’s what being a journalist used to mean. Nowadays, as Clinton said, some in the press are cooperative and that is what’s killing American mainstream media. That’s why only 6% trust the media.
Perhaps this is because the NDAA act legalized propaganda against American citizens and repealed the Smith-Mundit Act – which previously protected Americans against government sponsored propaganda after the CIA was exposed faking news stories.
That is why more people are turning to alternative media like We Are Change and others for their dose of news – because the mainstream media doesn’t do their job.
I know several mainstream reporters, and I know how it works reporters have to submit stories and get them cleared by their editors and their editors’ boss and up the chain – just like the movie Anchorman 2 highlights. If a story affects a sponsor or someone with influence, it gets pulled.
As Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton gave a speech in Reno, attempting to smear the millions of people who support her opponent Donald Trump as racist monsters — 4chan was in the building to gloriously troll the low-energy event.
Shortly before the toxic speech began, an anonymous user posted to the messageboard with a photo of a rare Pepe held up with the crowd in the background.
“At a hill rally in the top left corner of the balcony. Look for me!” the poster wrote.
Immediately, other users began urging the original poster to shout “Pepe” during the speech in an attempt to give the possibly-sick candidate a seizure, and directing them which way to move in order to get into the camera’s shot.
It was quickly confirmed that they were, in fact, inside the rally.
Then, it happened.
“This is not conservatism as we have known it. This is not Republicanism as we have know it.These are race-baiting ideas, anti-Muslim and anti-immigrant ideas, anti-woman –– all key tenets making up an emerging racist ideology known as the ‘Alt-Right,'” Clinton proclaimed during quite possibly, the most race-baiting speech of all time.
From the likely-geriatric or paid-to-be-there crowd, a voice was heard shouting — “PEPE!”
The internet crowd went wild.
“OP DID IT THE MAD MAN!!!!!!” a user wrote.
“Alt-Right is short for ‘Alternative Right,'” Clinton continued, explaining the words to her loyal subjects as she geared up to blast some serious conspiracy theories their way.
“The de facto merger between Breitbart and the Trump Campaign represents a landmark achievement for the ‘Alt-Right.’ A fringe element has effectively taken over the Republican Party,” Clinton stated, in a moment of rare truth from the candidate.
As she continued, security was seen moving to grab the brave anon, though it remains unclear if the internet’s hero was ejected from the rally or detained in any way.
4chan, like Trump himself, may not always be the hero we want — but sometimes they are the hero that we need.
Czech police stopped an armed man in a black Mercedes from joining German Chancellor Angela Merkel’s motorcade during her visit to the Prague capital today to meet Prime Minister Bohuslav Sobotka of Czech Republic.
It’s suspected he was trying to assassinate Angela Merkel. The plot has been averted and security forces are investigating.
Police spokesman Josef Bocan said, “The perpetrator has been detained. He is suspected of attempting to cause a crime – specifically an attempt to use violence against an official. The incident is currently being investigated by Prague detectives.”
No motivation for the attack has been released.
There is a growing anger in Germany over the crimes and rapes committed by the tens of thousands of migrants Merkel has ushered into the country.
ISIS itself has also not taken credit for the attack. ISIS has called for further attacks across Europe in a propaganda video a few days prior to this assassination attempt. Today’s incident comes as terror levels have been raised high in Europe after a series of random attacks against innocent civilians across Europe leaving scores injured and hundreds dead.
In the video, a Jihadist can be heard encouraging further attacks saying –
“So brothers, when you have any chance to kill one of those American of French infidels or any of those who support them, take it. You can smash his head with a stone, slaughter him, run him over by car, throw him off a roof, strangle him or even poison him. The important thing is not to hesitate or give up and let your goal be to kill this infidel or die trying.”
We will keep you up to date as this situation develops stay tuned to We Are Change.
A Colorado sheriff has been arrested for allegedly sexually assaulting a disabled woman at his home before bringing her to jail.
Sedgwick County Sheriff Thomas Hanna, 43, is charged with felony sexual assault of an at-risk adult, felony sexual conduct with an inmate, and misdemeanor charges of official misconduct and soliciting prostitution.
The incident took place on August 10, as Hanna was supposed to be transporting the disabled woman to Logan County Jail. Instead, the elected sheriff allegedly brought her to his home, in his personal vehicle, and offered her $60 for sex.
The woman told investigators that the sheriff told her “I just want sex,” and ordered her to remove her clothing. He allegedly used his fingers to assault her while exposing himself. She claims that he also threatened to imprison her for the rest of her life if she reported the assault.
The victim says that she did not ask the sheriff for the money that he promised her, but he later placed $20 on her commissary account. Hanna claims that he did this because he “has a big heart” and wanted her to be able to call her brother.
According to the affidavit, the woman who has not been publicly named stated that she was “ashamed” of her disability and did not understand that she had been victimized. She is described as being unable to function on her own, and was in jail on harassment and domestic violence charges.
The investigation into Hanna’s actions came after Deputy Larry Neugebauer reported seeing Hanna place the woman in his personal truck — and later seeing that truck parked outside his home. Transporting a prisoner in a personal vehicle is a violation of the department’s policy.
“There was information given to me that I had to act on quickly and I did that and once I deemed it necessary I brought in the Colorado Bureau of Investigation and went from there and then made the decision that the 18th needed to take over so everything has happened rather quickly but I’ve done everything with as much transparency as possible,” District Attorney Brittny Lewton told the local CBS affiliate.
Hanna has declined taking a polygraph test, but claims that he had taken the woman to his home to discuss criminal activity in the area — which he says was a “poor decision.”
Hanna’s bond has been set at $250,000 and he faces anywhere from eight years to life in prison if he is convicted of the felony charges.
If he is released on bond, he will be required to wear a GPS device, remain at least 100 yards from Sedgwick County Courthouse, not contact his victim or any witnesses, and not contact anyone under the age of 18 — which includes his two foster children.
Hanna’s next court appearance is scheduled for September 16.
Hillary Clinton hasn’t held a press conference in over 260 days, and while the mainstream media is looking the other way, they are also going out of their way to cover up another topic related to the Democratic nominee: her health.
The corporate media has tried to bury the story by acting like it’s none of our business. Perhaps knowing everything about Clinton’s health records isn’t our business, but why aren’t we allowed to ask questions?
The job of president is an incredibly stressful and demanding position, and many people are questioning whether Clinton could handle it—not because she is a woman—but because of her conduct on the campaign trail.
Dr. Drew Pinsky, who has become known as the celebrity addiction expert, was ridiculed by the media for saying that after examining Clinton’s medical records, he became “gravely concerned” over both Clinton’s health and the quality of healthcare she is receiving. While the mainstream media acted as though Dr. Drew was just pandering to a crazy conspiracy theory, Dr. Bob Lahita said he thinks Clinton’s history leaves room for concern and that all candidates should be more open about their medical records.
Then former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani came along and pointed out the media hypocrisy surrounding Clinton. Although he was interrupted by the Fox News talking head interviewing him, Giuliani’s call for Americans to go online and research Clinton’s health did not go unheard.
In fact, one New York Times columnist thought that Giuliani’s comment would garner so much attention that it deserved censorship by Google. Writing that Google should “fix this,” Tech columnist Farhad Manjoo said the search engine “shouldn’t give quarter to conspiracy theorists.” While Google did not respond directly to the tweet, if they were ever to give an honest response, they would say that Manjoo’s wish has already been granted, because Google has a history of censoring search results related to Hillary Clinton.
At the end of the day, what started with questions about the well being of the Democratic nominee has been blown out of proportion by a mainstream media that seems so intent on covering it up that it really makes you wonder: what are they trying to hide?