Alright, so I have one day before Defcon and BlackHat, so I decided on doing a new platform for sharing news that should be front page news but is not. Let me know what you think of it honestly and it gets a good response with good viewership we will do it everyday. (more…)
By Alec Cope
We Are Change
If you are reading this, chances are you downloaded Windows 10; and are rightfully disturbed. In all honesty, I did too (the Cortana feature was too alluring) despite the fact I understood what I was getting myself into: ever more intimate surveillance.
By Alec Cope
We Are Change
[The video of Obama making this statement is below.]
On Tuesday, President Obama spoke in front of the African Union Tuesday and was quoted as saying:
“I actually think I’m a pretty good president,”
he followed with,
“I think if I ran, I could win. But I can’t. So there’s a lot that I’d like to do to keep America moving, but the law is the law.”
In front of the cheering Union crowd, Obama had began the above narrative with this interesting statement:
“Now, let me be honest with you, [We have video footage of him being accidentally honest here.] I do not understand this. I am in my second term. It has been an extraordinary privilege for me to serve as the President of the United States. I cannot imagine a greater honor or a more interesting job. I love my work. But under our Constitution, I cannot run again.”
Let’s look at this. The pathologically lying President, the same President with millions of fake Twitter “followers”, the same President who projects absolute illusion to accommodate his secretive and aggressive policies – is attempting to open the public narrative for the revision and open crucifixion of the United State’s Constitution; in front of an applauding audience. How insane does this appear to you?
One almost symbolic aspect could have been a “rent a crowd” being used for some of the attendees of Obomber’s speech for all we really know (I’m not saying that’s what happened, only raising awareness of this laughable practice). The President of Illusion and Lies has began his trance; and many mice may follow this Presidential Pied Piper into the awaiting trap.
We can only observe this story and see where it leads. Could the idea of another third-term President be pertaining to him – or the next President that is “elected”? We’ll have to wait and see. Even so, if this does lead into an actual debate, we will have seen it all unfold in the open; and can become empowered to never “fall for it” again. I’ll finish this article off with a quote by the last third-term President of the United States:
“Presidents are selected, not elected.”
[The video mentioned at the top of this article is below.]
In this video Luke Rudkowski takes you on this journey from Miami to Los Angeles as he attends his first ever VidCon. We also give a special message to a fan who’s not doing too well and by watching this video you could play the guess which celebrity Luke is meeting on Sunday game.
Limited Edition Bilderberg t-shirt http://teespring.com/InvestigateBilderbergTees.
Send your get well photos to firstname.lastname@example.org
To learn about PINAC go to http://photographyisnotacrime.com/
Support WeAreChange by Subscribing HERE www.youtube.com/subscription_center?add_user=WeAreChange
Check out the new Limited Edition “Investigate Bilderberg” t-shirt that will help us sue them here http://wearechange.org/store/
Follow Us on SnapChat: LukeWeAreChange
Like Us on Facebook: https://facebook.com/LukeWeAreChange
Follow Us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/Lukewearechange
Stalk Luke on Instagram: http://instagram.com/lukewearechange
Rep WeAreChange Merch Proudly: http://wearechange.org/store
OH YEAH since we are not corporate or government WHORES help us out http://wearechange.org/donate
We take BITCOIN too
The title of a piece in today’s New York Times poses the question: “Is Polygamy Next?” In it, University of Chicago law professor William Baude discusses the precedent for legalizing polygamy in America—a precedent created by the legalization of same-sex marriage.
Baude believes there is a very good argument in favor of legalizing polygamy:
“Justice Anthony M. Kennedy’s majority opinion in Obergefell did not focus primarily on the issue of sexual orientation. Instead, its main focus was on a ‘fundamental right to marry’—a right that he said could not be limited to rigid historical definitions or left to the legislative process. That right was about autonomy and fulfillment, about child rearing and the social order. By those lights, groups of adults who have profound polyamorous attachments and wish to build families and join the community have a strong claim to a right to marry.”
The main arguments against polygamy are slippery-slope arguments (“what could happen if so-and-so was allowed), which are notoriously weak. Thus, “Writing in Slate after the decision in Obergefell, Judge Richard A. Posner of the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit rejected a right to plural marriage because it would lead to gender imbalances if ‘the five wealthiest men have a total of 50 wives.’ Similarly, the same-sex marriage advocate Jonathan Rauch has argued that polygamy allows ‘high-status men to hoard wives’ and destabilizes society.” It is worth noting that slippery-slope arguments represented one of the principal defenses used by opponents of same-sex marriage.
“The deeper point is that we should remember that today’s showstopping objections sometimes come to seem trivial decades later. Very few people supported a constitutional right to same-sex marriage when writers like Andrew Sullivan and Mr. Rauch were advocating it only two decades ago… We should not assume that our judges have all the answers. And we should not assume we have them either. Instead we should recognize that once we abandon the rigid constraints of history, we cannot be sure that we know where the future will take us.”
For the sake of both legal and intellectual consistency, should the U.S. legalize polygamy?