Windows 10 Spies On 14 Million Users: Here’s How To Stop It

"We can see everything you're doing through our window."

“We can see everything you’re doing through our, window.”

By Alec Cope
We Are Change

If you are reading this, chances are you downloaded Windows 10; and are rightfully disturbed. In all honesty, I did too (the Cortana feature was too alluring) despite the fact I understood what I was getting myself into: ever more intimate surveillance.

The same cannot be said for the 14 million people who “opted-in” for the spy-system however. (more…)

Obama: “If I ran a third term, I could win.”

By Alec Cope
We Are Change

[The video of Obama making this statement is below.]

On Tuesday, President Obama spoke in front of the African Union Tuesday and was quoted as saying:

“I actually think I’m a pretty good president,”

he followed with,

“I think if I ran, I could win. But I can’t. So there’s a lot that I’d like to do to keep America moving, but the law is the law.”

In front of the cheering Union crowd, Obama had began the above narrative with this interesting statement:

“Now, let me be honest with you, [We have video footage of him being accidentally honest here.] I do not understand this. I am in my second term. It has been an extraordinary privilege for me to serve as the President of the United States. I cannot imagine a greater honor or a more interesting job. I love my work. But under our Constitution, I cannot run again.”

Let’s look at this. The pathologically lying President, the same President with millions of fake Twitter “followers”, the same President who projects absolute illusion to accommodate his secretive and aggressive policies – is attempting to open the public narrative for the revision and open crucifixion of the United State’s Constitution; in front of an applauding audience. How insane does this appear to you?

One almost symbolic aspect could have been a “rent a crowd” being used for some of the attendees of Obomber’s speech for all we really know (I’m not saying that’s what happened, only raising awareness of this laughable practice). The President of Illusion and Lies has began his trance; and many mice may follow this Presidential Pied Piper into the awaiting trap.

We can only observe this story and see where it leads. Could the idea of another third-term President be pertaining to him – or the next President that is  “elected”? We’ll have to wait and see. Even so, if this does lead into an actual debate, we will have seen it all unfold in the open; and can become empowered to never “fall for it” again. I’ll finish this article off with a quote by the last third-term President of the United States:

“Presidents are selected, not elected.”

Franklin D. Roosevelt

[The video mentioned at the top of this article is below.]

TSA Crystal Energy Vampires and VidCon!!

In this video Luke Rudkowski takes you on this journey from Miami to Los Angeles as he attends his first ever VidCon. We also give a special message to a fan who’s not doing too well and by watching this video you could play the guess which celebrity Luke is meeting on Sunday game.

Limited Edition Bilderberg t-shirt http://teespring.com/InvestigateBilderbergTees.

Send your get well photos to guscampos111@gmail.com

How To Fight A Judge And Win

In this video Luke Rudkowski interviews Carlos Miller and Grant Stern of PINAC about their recent victory over judges in Jacksonville Florida.

To learn about PINAC go to http://photographyisnotacrime.com/

Support WeAreChange by Subscribing HERE www.youtube.com/subscription_center?add_user=WeAreChange

Check out the new Limited Edition “Investigate Bilderberg” t-shirt that will help us sue them here http://wearechange.org/store/

Follow Us on SnapChat: LukeWeAreChange
Like Us on Facebook: https://facebook.com/LukeWeAreChange
Follow Us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/Lukewearechange
Stalk Luke on Instagram: http://instagram.com/lukewearechange

Rep WeAreChange Merch Proudly: http://wearechange.org/store

OH YEAH since we are not corporate or government WHORES help us out http://wearechange.org/donate

We take BITCOIN too
12HdLgeeuA87t2JU8m4tbRo247Yj5u2TVP

Should the U.S. Legalize Polygamy?

 

polygamy_0The title of a piece in today’s New York Times poses the question: “Is Polygamy Next?” In it, University of Chicago law professor William Baude discusses the precedent for legalizing polygamy in America—a precedent created by the legalization of same-sex marriage.

Baude believes there is a very good argument in favor of legalizing polygamy:

“Justice Anthony M. Kennedy’s majority opinion in Obergefell did not focus primarily on the issue of sexual orientation. Instead, its main focus was on a ‘fundamental right to marry’—a right that he said could not be limited to rigid historical definitions or left to the legislative process. That right was about autonomy and fulfillment, about child rearing and the social order. By those lights, groups of adults who have profound polyamorous attachments and wish to build families and join the community have a strong claim to a right to marry.”

The main arguments against polygamy are slippery-slope arguments (“what could happen if so-and-so was allowed), which are notoriously weak. Thus, “Writing in Slate after the decision in Obergefell, Judge Richard A. Posner of the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit rejected a right to plural marriage because it would lead to gender imbalances if ‘the five wealthiest men have a total of 50 wives.’ Similarly, the same-sex marriage advocate Jonathan Rauch has argued that polygamy allows ‘high-status men to hoard wives’ and destabilizes society.” It is worth noting that slippery-slope arguments represented one of the principal defenses used by opponents of same-sex marriage.

Baude concludes:

“The deeper point is that we should remember that today’s showstopping objections sometimes come to seem trivial decades later. Very few people supported a constitutional right to same-sex marriage when writers like Andrew Sullivan and Mr. Rauch were advocating it only two decades ago… We should not assume that our judges have all the answers. And we should not assume we have them either. Instead we should recognize that once we abandon the rigid constraints of history, we cannot be sure that we know where the future will take us.”

For the sake of both legal and intellectual consistency, should the U.S. legalize polygamy?

 

http://www.i-to.org/blog/should-us-legalize-polygamy

Former general Wesley Clark calls for sending “radicalized Americans” to concentration camps

 

Unknown

Retired general and former Democratic presidential candidate Wesley Clark on Friday called for World War II-style internment camps to be revived for “disloyal Americans.” In an interview with MSNBC’s Thomas Roberts in the wake of the mass shooting in Chatanooga, Tennessee, Clark said that during World War II, “if someone supported Nazi Germany at the expense of the United States, we didn’t say that was freedom of speech, we put him in a camp, they were prisoners of war.”

He called for a revival of internment camps to help combat Muslim extremism, saying, “If these people are radicalized and they don’t support the United States and they are disloyal to the United States as a matter of principle, fine. It’s their right and it’s our right and obligation to segregate them from the normal community for the duration of the conflict.”
The comments were shockingly out of character for Clark, who after serving as supreme allied commander of NATO made a name for himself in progressive political circles. In 2004, his campaign for the Democratic presidential nomination was highly critical of the Bush administration’s excessive response to the 9/11 terror attacks. Since then, he has been a critic of policies that violate the Geneva Convention, saying in 2006 that policies such as torture violate “the very values that [we] espouse.”

In a memoir written the following year, he also famously alleged that the White House under Bush had developed a massively imperialistic plan for the Middle East, which would see the administration attempt to “take out seven countries in five years,” beginning with the invasions in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Earlier this year I spoke with Clark at the annual Lewis and Clark University Symposium on International Affairs in Portland, Oregon. The subject of our discussion was how to deal with the potential threat of foreign fighters returning from armed conflicts abroad. At the time, Clark spoke out strongly against “the politics of fear” and eroding democratic institutions and norms, while reiterating his criticism of the excesses committed by Bush-era neoconservatives under the banner of fighting terrorism.

But on Friday, he was advocating the revival of a policy widely considered to be among the most shameful chapters in American history: World War II domestic internment camps. Aside from the inherent problems in criminalizing people for their beliefs, Clark’s proposal (which his MSNBC interlocutor did not challenge him on) also appears to be based on the concept of targeting people for government scrutiny who are not even “radicalized,” but who the government decides may be subject to radicalization in the future. That radicalization itself is a highly amorphous and politically malleable concept only makes this proposal more troubling.

“We have got to identify the people who are most likely to be radicalized. We’ve got to cut this off at the beginning,” Clark said. “I do think on a national policy level we need to look at what self-radicalization means because we are at war with this group of terrorists.” And he added that “not only the United States but our allied nations like Britain, Germany and France are going to have to look at their domestic law procedures.”

Despite an outcry about his comments on social media, Clark has not responded publicly. As of Monday morning, his latest tweet was from Friday, encouraging his followers to watch his interview.

Pin It on Pinterest

Password Reset
Please enter your e-mail address. You will receive a new password via e-mail.