What You Need To Know About The Women’s March On Washington

Over 1 million women participated in the Women’s March on Washington on Saturday, and it raised the question: What exactly are these women protesting?

A lot of the posters and social media posts that came out of the event painted a picture of a massive presence that was standing up for what they labeled as “women’s rights” that have been put in danger by President Trump.

Many women have voiced the concern that Roe v. Wade will be overturned, and abortion will be made illegal under Trump. However, Trump has never said that he wanted to ban abortion completely. What he has said is that he plans on appointing Supreme Court Justices who are “pro-life,” and if they choose to overturn Roe v. Wade, then abortion laws will be determined by the states.

Women have also criticized the fact that Trump reportedly plans to defund Planned Parenthood, because of the fact that it currently provides a taxpayer-funded abortion service.

All of this comes back to the same question: Why are 1 million women gathering together to demand that the federal government fund their healthcare and tell them what they can and cannot do? Why aren’t they looking for other alternatives and answers to the current problems?

[RELATED: More Than 50 Soros-Funded Groups Participated in Women’s March On Washington]

Is this protest truly about women’s rights, or is it about women hopping on the bandwagon and demanding that the government take care of their needs?

If it was really about women’s rights, then there would be over 1 million women marching in protests against the fact that the U.S. has allies like Saudi Arabia. There would be over 1 million women protesting the fact that the government continues to expand mass surveillance, and to jeopardize our civil liberties. And there would be over 1 million women protesting the fact that our government continues to push for endless war in the Middle East, and hundreds of thousands of innocent women and children have died as a result.

The right to peaceful protest is acknowledged by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution, and while any American can protest whatever he/she feels is necessary, it is always important to take the time to research and to ask questions first.

Follow Rachel Blevins on Facebook and Twitter.

Rachel Blevins is a Texas-based journalist who aspires to break the left/right paradigm in media and politics by pursuing truth and questioning existing narratives.

Republican Congressmen Sponsor Bill To Remove U.S. From The United Nations

House Republicans have introduced H.R. 193, the “American Sovereignty Restoration Act of 2017,” a bill that seeks to remove the United States from the United Nations.

If passed, the bill would cut funding to the UN, and withdrawal the U.S. from the United Nations Participation Act of 1945. The legislation is backed by Rep. Mike D. Rogers (R-Ala.) with co-sponsors, Rep. Walter B. Jones Jr. (R-N.C.), Rep. Andy Biggs (R-Ariz.), Rep. Jason Smith (R-Mo.), Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.), Rep. John J.Duncan Jr. (R-Tenn.), and Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-Fla.).

The bill has not passed the Committee, House or Senate yet.

The American Sovereignty Act was proposed first in 2009, then in 2013, and then again in 2015, and it failed to pass the Committee. Now that Republicans have control of both houses of Congress, could the bill finally pass?

President Trump called for the U.S. to withdraw from NATO and the United Nations during his campaign for his presidency.

Trump also tweeted out “The United Nations has such great potential but right now it is just a club for people to get together, talk and have a good time. So sad!”

Trump added, “As to the UN, things will be different after Jan. 20th,” referring to the day he was inaugurated.

Will 2017 be the year that the U.S. is removed from the United Nations, an organization that is pushing for the 2030 Agenda? You can read the full bill here. Excerpts are below:

“The bill would require: (1) the President to terminate U.S. membership in the United Nations (U.N.), including any organ, specialized agency, commission, or other formally affiliated body; and (2) closure of the U.S. Mission to the United Nations.

The bill prohibits: (1) the authorization of funds for the U.S. assessed or voluntary contribution to the U.N., (2) the authorization of funds for any U.S. contribution to any U.N. military or peacekeeping operation, (3) the expenditure of funds to support the participation of U.S. Armed Forces as part of any U.N. military or peacekeeping operation, (4) U.S. Armed Forces from serving under U.N. command, and (5) diplomatic immunity for U.N. officers or employees.”


I am an Activist a writer a blogger and an investigative journalist writing for (www.wearechange.org)

A Radio host of the Blog-talk Radio Series:

My Sources are everywhere..
Enemy of the New World Order.

Riot Police Shoot Flash Bang Grenades At Media On Live Video – Police Chief Blames Protesters

Image via Luke Rudkowski/WeAreChange

The overall picture of Friday’s Inauguration Day protests is one of legions of black-clad stormtrooper-like police attacking mostly unarmed protesters and media. It reflects terribly on Washington DC, let alone on Inauguration Day, and no amount of official disinformation is going to hide the truth that was broadcast to the world.

Washington D.C. Police Chief Peter Newsham claimed on Sunday that the flash bang grenades thrown at protesters and journalists during the inauguration protests did not come from his officers.

Instead Newsham said the grenades must have belonged to the protesters. This obvious attempt at misleading the public is easily disproven by the thousands of live videos and photographs available on social media—including exclusive footage from WeAreChange—showing Newsham’s officers firing the less-than-lethal grenades directly at protesters and media.

The Police Chief seems to forget that there were dozens of people streaming the event live, with countless eye-witnesses from all around the world watching the events unfold on the streets on Friday.

Newsham said that the “department is investigating whether officers handling the protests deployed either flash-bang or percussion grenades — used to disorient people in crowds — and he said that protesters had their own.”

WeAreChange’s Luke Rudkowski caught the police on video throwing flash bang grenades, spraying heavy doses of pepper spray and barricading and aggravating the crowd. In one video, a flash bang grenade launched by an officer lands mere feet away from Rudkowski and then explodes, knocking a nearby individual to the ground.

[RELATED: DC Police Launch Flash Bang Grenades, Pepper Spray Protesters Prior To Inauguration]

The brutality on display by officers is impossible to ignore. In the video below, you can clearly see an officer use his baton to shove a protester in the back.

[RELATED: Protesters And Police Continue To Clash As DC Devolves Into An All Out War Zone]

Even the Washington Post agreed with us on this one. They have clearly stated that their reporters saw police launching the flash-bang grenades:


Besides that, it is a well-known fact that as far back as the Vietnam-era anti-war protests, there have always been paid police provocateurs and saboteurs, employed specifically to engage in gratuitous property damage in order to justify mass arrests and escalation of police tactics.

During Occupy there were dozens of suspected provocateurs, a U.S. Judge Joan Campbell was infuriated to discover that the Houston police were using agent provocateurs against Occupy Austin in order to set protesters up on felony charges.

A lawsuit has already been filed by NLG legal observers who were present at the #DisruptJ20 protests. The suit alleges that the officers used excessive force during arrests at 12th and L Streets.

Some of the protesters that were arrested are facing an egregious 10 years in jail and $25,000 fines, after being charged with felonies for being arrested at the protest even if they didn’t participate in any rioting.

The charges assume guilt by association, meaning anyone who was there exercising their right to free speech and right to assembly is being lumped in with the alleged rioters and now face these trumped-up legal consequences.

The less-than lethal weaponry deployed against protesters included rubber bullets. These have been proven to be fully capable of in fact causing fatality and therefore it has been stated, should not be classed as less-than lethal.

As Sgt. Shamar Thomas said during Occupy Wall St., “There is no honor in harming unarmed civilians” and many of these protesters were unarmed while some did have hammers and flags.

What do you think about this story? Let us know in the comments!

I am an Activist a writer a blogger and an investigative journalist writing for (www.wearechange.org)

A Radio host of the Blog-talk Radio Series:

My Sources are everywhere..
Enemy of the New World Order.

More Than 50 Soros-Funded Groups Partnered With Women’s March On Washington

Liberal billionaire and notable Clinton donor George Soros reportedly has ties to more than 50 groups in the Women’s March on Washington against President Donald Trump.

The New York Times reported that it found the links to Soros after studying 403 groups that are partners of Saturday’s march.

The march pins itself as non-partisan, however it claims to have a message that is announcing to “our new government on their first day in office, and to the world that women’s rights are human rights.”

The march’s official website says, “We stand together, recognizing that defending the most marginalized among us is defending all of us.”

NYT Reporter Asra Q. Nomani noted that she uncovered that not only was the march a partisan event, Soros’s money was everywhere. She reported that she found financial ties between Soros and at least 56 of the march’s “partners.”

A few of these organizations include Planned Parenthood, the National Resource Defense Council, MoveOn.org, the National Action Network, the American Civil Liberties Union, Center for Constitutional Rights, Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch, Arab-American Association of New York, Council on American-Islamic Relations and the Southern Poverty Law Center.

Nomani also spoke to a spokeswoman from Soros’s Open Society Foundation who said that, contrary to popular belief, these were “false reports” and that OSF supports “a wide range of organizations.”

“There have been many false reports about George Soros and the Open Society Foundations funding protests in the wake of the U.S. presidential elections,” The spokeswoman told the Times. “There is no truth to these reports.”

[RELATED: George Soros Throws Tantrum Over Donald Trump]

According to a memo released by WikiLeaks that was sent to Soros by Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta, the campaign wanted to use grassroots organizations to “control political discourse.” Podesta wrote that he wanted to better utilize these networks to drive the content of politics through a strong echo chamber.”

“Control the political discourse. So much effort over the past few years has been focused on better coordinating, strengthening, and developing progressive institutions and leaders. Now that this enhanced infrastructure is in place—grassroots organizing; multi-issue advocacy groups; think tanks; youth outreach; faith communities; micro-targeting outfits; the netroots and blogosphere—we need to better utilize these networks to drive the content of politics through a strong “echo chamber” and message delivery system.”

George Soros has been exposed funding Black Lives Matter protests to expand police presence, funding media coverage of the Ukrainian conflict, and funding along with other shady ventures.

[RELATED: WIKILEAKS: “Ordo Ab Chao” George Soros’s Plan For America Exposed]

I am an Activist a writer a blogger and an investigative journalist writing for (www.wearechange.org)

A Radio host of the Blog-talk Radio Series:

My Sources are everywhere..
Enemy of the New World Order.

Disgraced Former Congressmen Wants ‘Hush Money’ Back From Victim He Abused

Imprisoned former House Speaker Dennis Hastert is reportedly demanding the return of the $1.7 million in “hush money” he paid to a man he sexually abused, after that man exposed him to the federal government.

Hastert is also demanding that the victim, referred to as “Individual A,” pay for his attorney fees. The demands from Hastert were made in response to a lawsuit filed by his accuser, who is trying to claim the rest of the money the politician promised him.

Hastert argued that the oral contract was breached when the man told the feds, which resulted in Hastert being investigated. He is now serving a mere 15-month sentence for the sexual abuse.

“To the extent any contract existed between plaintiff [Individual A] and defendant [Hastert], plaintiff breached that contract,” Hastert’s lawyers wrote. “Plaintiff’s breach of conduct resulted in damages to defendant and plaintiff is accordingly required to return $1.7 million to defendant.”

Hastert’s prison sentence began in June. Individual A is not the only one who Hastert is alleged to have paid, and he has a long history of abuse, according to FBI translator whistle-blower Sibel Edmonds, who is credited with breaking the real Dennis Hastert pedophile scandal story.

Three other victims came forward anonymously during Hastert’s trial to report their abuse allegations.

[RELATED: WIKILEAKS: Emails Discuss Disgraced House Speaker Pedophile Dennis Hastert]

During Hastert’s sentencing, Judge Thomas Durkin called him a “serial child molester.”

Individual A argued that Hastert agreed in 2010 to pay him $3.5 million if he did not disclose that Hastert molested him in the 1970s, when he was just 14 years old. Hastert never complied with that payment, and the man’s lawsuit argues that Hastert still owes him $1.8 million.

Individual A’s attorney Kristi Browne responded by calling Hastert “predictable.”

“Mr. Hastert has decided that rather than live up to his promise to compensate his victim for his molestation and resulting injury, he will ask his victim to pay him. He admits to agreeing to make payments but then denies that it is an agreement that he has to keep. His response is predictable and we look forward to entering the discovery phase of the case,” Browne said in a statement.

I am an Activist a writer a blogger and an investigative journalist writing for (www.wearechange.org)

A Radio host of the Blog-talk Radio Series:

My Sources are everywhere..
Enemy of the New World Order.

BREAKING: Man Shot at University of Washington During Milo Yiannopoulos Event

A man was shot Friday night during an event for Milo Yiannopoulos at the University of Washington in Seattle.

KIRO-TV reported that the man was taken to the hospital with a “possible life threatening injury” following the shooting.

According to the local CBS affiliate, protesters began arriving about two hours before Yiannopoulos was scheduled to speak at the event. The protesters began clashing with police, and they “threw rocks, fireworks, and other items at officers.”

Q13 Fox reported, “Hundreds of protesters had gathered at the UW campus” to oppose the event and “tensions grew as masked protesters attempted to block the doors to the building where Yiannopoulos was scheduled to speak, and others who had wanted to attend the speech.”

The Seattle Times reported that the gunman in the shooting is still at large, and police are currently searching for a suspect who fits the description of a 50-year-old Asian man who is approximately 5-foot-7 and 190 pounds.


Following the shooting, Yiannopoulos released a statement on his Facebook page:

“There was a shooting tonight outside my event at the University of Washington in Seattle, local police have confirmed. A man was taken to hospital with a potentially life-threatening wound to the abdomen. We don’t know any more at this time. My prayers are with the victim, whoever he is.”


*This story is breaking, stay tuned for updates*



Rachel Blevins is a Texas-based journalist who aspires to break the left/right paradigm in media and politics by pursuing truth and questioning existing narratives.

Pin It on Pinterest