The Saudi press is still furious over the U.S. Senate’s unanimous vote approving a bill that allows the families of 9/11 victims to sue Saudi Arabia.
This time, the London-based Al-Hayat daily has claimed that the U.S. planned the attacks on the World Trade Center in order to create a global war on terror.
The article, written by Saudi legal expert Katib al-Shammari and translated by MEMRI, claims that American threats to expose documents that prove Saudi involvement in the attacks are part of a long-standing U.S. policy that he calls “victory by means of archives.”
Al-Shammari claims that the U.S. chooses to keep some cards close to its chest in order to use them at a later date. One example is choosing not to invade Iraq in the 1990s and keeping its leader, Saddam Hussein, alive to use as “a bargaining chip” against other Gulf States. Only once Shi’ism threatened to sweep the region did America act to get rid of Hussein “since they no longer saw him as an ace up their sleeve.”
He claims that the 9/11 attacks were another such card, enabling the U.S. to blame whoever suited its needs at a particular time; first it blamed Al-Qaeda and the Taliban, then Saddam Hussein’s regime in Iraq, and now Saudi Arabia.
September 11 is one of winning cards in the American archives, because all the wise people in the world who are experts on American policy and who analyze the images and the videos [of 9/11] agree unanimously that what happened in the [Twin] Towers was a purely American action, planned and carried out within the U.S. Proof of this is the sequence of continuous explosions that dramatically ripped through both buildings. … Expert structural engineers demolished them with explosives, while the planes crashing [into them] only gave the green light for the detonation – they were not the reason for the collapse. But the U.S. still spreads blame in all directions.
The intention of the attacks, writes al-Shammari in his conspiracy article, was to create “an obscure enemy – terrorism – which became what American presidents blamed for all their mistakes” and that would provide justification for any “dirty operation” in other countries.
The terror label was applied to Muslims even though it was Muslims who helped America defeat the Soviets and bring an end to the Cold War, he writes. The problem, asserts al-Shammari, is that the U.S. must always find a new impetus to have an adversary, for “the nature of the U.S. is that it cannot exist without an enemy.”
Al-Shammari’s article comes amid a torrent of vociferous articles in the Saudi press that range from accusing the U.S. of being “schizophrenic” and in cahoots with Iran to publishing warnings that if passed, the “Satanic” bill would “open the gates of hell.”
Prior to that, he wrote a series of articles which appear to have endorsed the ‘New World Order’ theory.
The revelations come ahead of Mr Corbyn’s first Labour conference as leader where a number of MPs are expected to state the party is unelectable under him.
Labour grandee Lord Mandelson has already warned MPs against making an early move to oust Jeremy Corbyn – but insisted the party could not win with the 66-year-old ‘loser’ in charge.
The former business secretary said the party had ‘stuck two fingers up’ at the country by choosing Mr Corbyn as leader but, in a leaked memo, he said Mr Corbyn couldn’t be replaced until he had shown how unpopular he is at the polls.
The articles, including one for ‘Labour Briefing’ in 1991, Mr Corbyn wrote that the Gulf War was a ‘curtain raiser’ for the New World Order, stating at the rich and powerful and ‘white and western’ could maintain economic order with the ‘free use of all the weapons’.
Furthermore, in Socialist Campaign Group News the same year, he wrote: ‘The aim of the war machine of the United States is to maintain a world order dominated by the banks and multinational companies of Europe and North America.’
Mr Corbyn stormed to victory in the Labour leadership contest with 60 per cent of the vote, despite being unknown outside Westminster.
But the nation’s first impression of the 66-year-old is far from positive in an IpsosMORI poll.
Mr Corbyn was on minus 3 per cent, with 33 per cent satisfied with the way he is doing his job and 36 per cent dissatisfied.
Recently the mainstream media has been plastered with headlines exposinghow Saudi Arabia was instrumental in implementing the attacks on 9/11, and how it had been “classified” originally only because of Saudi backmail. The recent wave of stories points to the House of Saud as the true architects of 9/11, not Osama Bin Laden and the CIA backed Taliban jihadist fighters hiding in the mountains of Afghanistan.
This barrage of stories may be designed to shift public scrutiny of 9/11 away from the Neo-conservative/Zionists that controlled the U.S. government during 9/11, and onto the Saudi Arabian government. Not only do these stories infer that the Saudi regime sponsored the 9/11 attacks, but they also implant the idea that the Saudis were responsible for the U.S. government’s cover-up of what happened. The result is a picture painted in the public’s mind of a dominating Saudi Arabia overpowering a helpless and innocent U.S., while obscuring the evidence of U.S. and Israeli involvement.
Then President George W. Bush and then Crown Prince of Saudi Arabia, Abdullah bin Abdulaziz al Saud walk amid the blue bonnets of Crawford, TX in 2005
The Saudi government was sued by thousands of 9/11 victim’s family members due to the suspicion that Saudi Arabia helped to finance Al Qaeda. The Saudis hired the law firm of Bush Administration insider James Baker to defend them in that lawsuit. The 9/11 families’ lawsuit against Saudi royals was thrown out on a technicality related to the ability to sue a foreign government and, later, the Obama Administration backed the Saudis during the appeal.
The Saudi rulers – as corrupt, autocratic and reprehensible as they are – are little more than middle-mangers of the U.S. and Israeli war machine that has invaded country after country in the middle east following 9/11. Middle-managers cannot organize the biggest conspiracy of the 21st century, hoodwinking the world’s foremost superpower and somehow managing to get away with it.
The Saudi men were ‘patsies’
“We know that the 15 hijackers who were Saudis, the alleged hijackers, because they were not on those planes – not one of the 19 hijackers, or any Arabs, were on any of the four planes, according to the Flight records passenger list, and according to all of the evidence that would be there if they were on the planes, but has not been produced,” said Dr. Kevin Barrett “And all 15 of these guys had that visa.”
A short, concise study of Israeli involvement in the 9/11 attacks, Zionist influence over US foreign policy (particularly the central role of pro-Israel neoconservatives in dragging the US into the war in Iraq), the fraud of the post-9/11 “war on terror,” and other Zionist political intrigues in the 20th and 21st centuries. This book explores the role of Zionists in helping foment World Wars I and II as a means of establishing a Jewish state in Palestine, the extensive collusion between Nazis and Zionists, the hidden history of bloody Bolshevism, and the fabrications and distortions of official World War II historiography, designed to advance the victors’ post-war agenda of re-shaping Europe and the Middle East.
In this video Luke Rudkowski breaks down the real truth behind the push by the establishment to release the 28 pages. We go over recent geopolitical moves around the petrodollar and how there is a bigger play here. The U.S seems to be threatening Saudi Arabia with old information that everyone was aware of and people need to ask why this is happening now. Support our work by investing in us on http://wearechange.org/donate/ and make sure do the job of the main stream media better then they ever can.
Related: Former Senator Claims “9/11 Attackers Had Support Within the United States” On CBS Nightly News
SUPPORT WE ARE CHANGE ALTERNATIVE NEWS NETWORK!
Enroll Today to learn how to be an Independent Journalist
There is a document, 28 pages in length, that’s locked away in the congressional vaults, guarded by armed security — it gives great details on the terrorist attacks that happened on 9/11.
Former Democratic senator who investigated the 9/11 terrorist attacks says he believes the hijackers had support from within the U.S. to carry out their deadly plot.
Bob Graham, chairman of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence and co-chair of the bipartisan joint congressional inquiry into the attacks, reported to 60 Minutes that the investigation revealed wealthy Saudi Arabian individuals and charity networks provided financial aid the terrorists.
Some of those conspirators were living in the U.S., Graham said — including two Saudi nationals who helped the hijackers find housing and contacts who arranged for their flight training
“I think it is implausible to believe that 19 people — most of whom didn’t speak English, most of whom had never been in the United States before, many of whom didn’t have a high school education — could’ve carried out such a complicated task without some support from within the United States,” he said.
However, the 28-pages have been conveniently avoided by those in the mainstream media — until now.
On Sunday night’s episode of 60 Minutes, former Florida governor, U.S. Senator and onetime chairman of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, Bob Graham implicated the US ally on national television.
Until now, anyone who questioned the highly suspect ‘official’ narrative on the 9/11 attacks has been labeled a conspiracy theorist or a kook. But when current and former members of Congress, U.S. officials, and the 9/11 Commissioners themselves call for the release of these 28-pages, which tells a different story of what happened that fateful day — people listen.
CBS reports Graham and his Joint Inquiry co-chair in the House, former Representative Porter Goss (R-FL) — who went on to be director of the CIA — say the 28 pages were excised from their report by the Bush Administration in the interest of national security. Graham wouldn’t discuss the classified contents, but says the 28 pages outline a network of people he believes supported hijackers in the U.S. He tells Steve Kroft he believes the hijackers were “substantially” supported by Saudi Arabia. Asked if the support was from government, rich people or charities, the former senator replies, “all of the above.”
The following script is from “28 Pages” which aired on April 10, 2016. Steve Kroft is the correspondent. Howard Rosenberg and Julie Holstein, producers.
Bob Graham: I think it is implausible to believe that 19 people, most of whom didn’t speak English, most of whom had never been in the United States before, many of whom didn’t have a high school education– could’ve carried out such a complicated task without some support from within the United States.
Steve Kroft: And you believe that the 28 pages are crucial to this? Understand…
Bob Graham: I think they are a key part.
Former U.S. Senator Bob Graham has been trying to get the 28 pages released since the day they were classified back in 2003, when he played a major role in the first government investigation into 9/11.
Bob Graham: “I remain deeply disturbed by the amount of material that has been censored from this report.”
At the time, Graham was chairman of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence and co-chair of the bipartisan joint congressional inquiry into intelligence failures surrounding the attacks. The Joint Inquiry reviewed a half a million documents, interviewed hundreds of witnesses and produced an 838 page report — minus the final chapter which was blanked out — excised by the Bush administration for reasons of national security.
However; Graham would not discuss the classified information in the 28 pages, he will say only that they outline a network of people that he believes supported the hijackers while they were in the U.S.
Steve Kroft: You believe that support came from Saudi Arabia?
Bob Graham: Substantially.
Steve Kroft: And when we say, “The Saudis,” you mean the government, the–
Bob Graham: I mean–
Steve Kroft: –rich people in the country? Charities–
Bob Graham: All of the above.
Graham and others believe the Saudi role has been soft-pedaled to protect a delicate relationship with a complicated kingdom where the rulers, royalty, riches and religion are all deeply intertwined in its institutions.
Bob Graham CBS News
Porter Goss, who was Graham’s Republican co-chairman on the House side of the Joint Inquiry, and later director of the CIA, also felt strongly that an uncensored version of the 28 pages should be included in the final report. The two men made their case to the FBI and its then–director Robert Mueller in a face-to-face meeting.
Porter Goss: And they pushed back very hard on the 28 pages and they said, “No, that cannot be unclassified at this time.”
Steve Kroft: Did you happen to ask the FBI director why it was classified?
Porter Goss: We did, in a general way, and the answer was because, “We said so and it needs to be classified.”
Goss says he knew of no reason then and knows of no reason now why the pages need to be classified. They are locked away under the capital in guarded vaults called Sensitive Compartmented Information Facilities, or SCIFs in government jargon. This is as close as we could get with our cameras — a highly restricted area where members of Congress with the proper clearances can read the documents under close supervision. No note-taking allowed.
Tim Roemer: Look, the Saudis have even said they’re for declassifying it. We should declassify it. Is it sensitive, Steve? Might it involve opening– a bit, a can of worms, or some snakes crawling out of there? Yes. But I think we need a relationship with the Saudis where both countries are working together to fight against terrorism. And that’s not always been the case.
Commission members say their findings in those 28 pages would certainly surprise many Americans — but most of them agree that they should be declassified.
According to an article on Geopolitics.co the pages were ultimately redacted because the investigation would eventually expose the culpability of the British Monarchy – established by following the money from the operatives to the House of Saud coming from the Queen’s royal bank account.
The Queen’s bank account is of course replenished every now and then by the biggest bankers of all, the Rothschild family, who work with the Jesuits running the Roman Vatican Empire behind the scenes to arrange all the pieces of the global terror ponzi scheme which is beginning to fall apart.
One thing for certain is that for nearly 16 years, the 28 pages have been locked away in a secret vault. Only a small group of people have ever seen them, We believe, along with the Senator Graham and the families of 9/11 victims that they should be declassified.
In this video Luke Rudkowski interviews William Rodriquez. William, is a native of Puerto Rico, a citizen of the United States, and a resident of the State of New Jersey. On September 11, 2001, and for approximately nineteen years prior thereto, Rodriguez was employed as a maintenance worker at the World Trade Center (WTC) in New York, New York. On that fateful day William’s actions transformed not only his life but all the lives around him that day. (more…)