WAC Chicago (flashback): Gov. Rod Blagojevich Uncensored

Back in 09′ WAC Chicago spoke with Gov. Blagojevich about the BOA incident that led to his arrest the following day. He’s been sentenced to 14 years in prison. Watch the video, spread the truth far and wide.

YouTube Preview Image

Detailed article from Infowars:


Charlie Skelton mainstream media taboo on 9/11 and Bilderberg

Check Out Charlie Skeltons London Guardian article with the interview he did with Luke Rudkowski http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/sep/12/september11-usa

Help We Are Change produce more videos like this! http://www.wearechange.org/?page_id=9453


Music: Lupe Fiasco – Words I Never Said ft. Skylar Grey

The Left/Right Paradigm. Can Fine Gael or Sinn Fein save Ireland? Well… no.

Alan – WaC Ireland

Some people seem to think that different political parties or allegiances can help solve this problem, for example that Sinn Fein are really against Fianna Fail, when they are really just hijacking the mood in the country. Politicians will not solve anything, they are not trained in it. They don’t actually know how to look at the problems of the country and figure out how to solve them. They are trained in basic book-cooking and NLP, how to present bad news well and smile for the cameras, except in the case of Cowen, who can’t even look pretty for the propaganda pieces we see on RTE, the Independent & the Times. The politicians are merely figureheads for the large financiers and banking interests that long ago bought this country. Complaining about a politician’s “decisions”, telling them to change or voting for a different one can be closely compared to the pop music industry.

Imagine for a second that you don’t like Britney Spears latest album: you think the video is woeful, you think the lyrics are unfit for children, you don’t like the album cover and the actual copy you bought skips on track 13. Of all of these things, there is very little you can do.
MAYBE if you went to the shop and made a fuss they’d exchange the copy for you but that’s it. They won’t give you a refund, they’ll just give you another copy of the same woeful album. Standing outside the HMV you bought it from picketing against Britney isn’t going to do anything. Neither is going to HMV head office. You might get a €10 gift voucher at most.

Breaking into Britney’s house and threatening that you’ll burn it down unless she does something is not going to change anything. She doesn’t have any power, she is just a figurehead for Britney Spears Inc. Certain people write her lyrics, other guys do her videos, someone else composes her “music”, another team markets the album to children, another team outsources printing of the CDs, etc. Almost none of these people are DIRECTLY controlled by the industry, they are not afraid of the Man Behind the Curtain, they don’t know the whole agenda, but they are cogs in it. Cogs that know their place. Cogs that know not to rock the boat or they lose their job. They are part of one big machine.

In the current political & economic global system even if you got a chance to take down or, as some have threatened to do at the recent marches, kill all the people that you think are the problem, they would be soon replaced by someone else. Nobody would even have to choose to replace them, it would just happen organically, like leaving a parking space free in the City Centre. We can’t expect to change anything by taking down the government, or even the bankers that control it. It is the 5000 year
old, hierarchical, pyramid shaped tyrannical system that is wrong, the system that needs to change. NO man has the right to tell you what to do or demand money from you, least of all some corrupt government!

What is the best way to make this change? Think about the music industry again and the answer becomes obvious. Stop supporting the system. Stop justifying the system by voting for criminals, stop paying taxes NOW. They are going to be used to fund the next generation of Irish Bank bondholders, such as the famous Rothschild dynasty. All income tax is used for is paying off the so-called “National/Sovereign Debt”. A Sovereign cannot be indebted to a fictional entity like a corporation/government.

Somebody asked me recently:
” Are the fine gael party & labour party going to vote in favour of the fianna fail/green Budget on the 7th of December?”

I can’t answer that question but ultimately I don’t think it is relevant. Are the rats and the vultures going to vote on who eats the maggot infected corpse strewn over the highway?  We’re talking about rival mob families, the Gambinos and the Luchesses. They all want power but they would never sell the others out to get it; they play by certain rules, rules that maintain the status quo so that the real power never changes, and people have the illusion of freedom of choice. It’s a powerful thing, that illusion, but a necessary one for the world’s elite to keep their foot in the door so to speak. If there was not choice people would rise up. Instead were faced with choices every day.

Notebook or Macbook? Doesn’t matter, they’re both made by quanta.
Daz, Surf or Ariel? All owned by Lever Bros.
Stella, Corona, Bud, Dutch Gold? You guessed it.
Left wing, right wing, Fianna Fail, Sinn Fein, green party, conservative, democrat, republican, socialist, communist or libertarian, they are all drinking form the same toilet. The international banking cartels have long since bought and paid for any semblance of real democracy decades ago. All the politicians ever offer is a slightly modified photocopy of the same outdated drawing.

We need self governance and community level co-ordination on employing private companies to do the work the state overcharged us on, different areas with different currencies for that area, or a LETS system, and a currency for international trading, backed by our oil reserves, rather than DEBT, and a voluntary law system based on common law; “Do no harm, cause no loss; your rights end where others begin”.

The only politician I’d ever listen to (and still be way of) is one who plans on reducing corporation status to less than that of a human being and dissolving outdated ideas like land ownership and corporations owning anything.
No more income tax, VAT pays for services that we use, no more complying with the Gardai on non-criminal acts; they are acting as revenue collectors for a fascist government and it’s time they realised that and return to their oath.

Alan – WaC Ireland

The official story of 9/11 is impossible – WaC Ireland

Article by Paul, Videos by Alan – http://www.wearechange.ie

“It is an old maxim of mine that when you have excluded the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth.” – Sherlock Holmes in “The Beryl Coronet”

When something is impossible it cannot happen. People can believe it happened, but belief does not trump impossible, no matter how many people believe or how convinced they might be. Impossible is impossible.

The ninth anniversary of the attacks on the World Trade Centre occurred last month. To mark the occasion We Are Change Eire hosted a free screening of ‘Loose Change An American Coup’ at Seomra Spraoi in Dublin and

Bombshell: Silverstein Wanted To Demolish Building 7 On 9/11

Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet.com
Friday, April 23, 2010

Bombshell: Silverstein Wanted To Demolish Building 7 On 9/11 230410top

Preface from Alex Jones: To truly grasp the magnitude of this story, you really have to read the entire article. Immediately after the “pull it” controversy, debunkers claimed there was no plan to conduct a controlled demolition of the building. Now the fact that officials were considering blowing up the building is established, Silverstein’s consistent denial that this took place is a huge smoking gun. How did Silverstein expect to demolish the building safely when such a process takes weeks or even months to properly set up, even without the additional chaos surrounding WTC 7 on 9/11? How could explosives have been correctly placed on such short notice inside a burning building that had already been evacuated – unless the explosives were already in place? This new revelation is astounding and it needs to be investigated immediately.

A Fox News hit piece against Jesse Ventura and the 9/11 truth movement written by former Washington D.C. prosecutor Jeffrey Scott Shapiro inadvertently reveals a shocking truth, that World Trade Center leaseholder Larry Silverstein, who collected nearly $500 million dollars in insurance as a result of the collapse of Building 7, a 47-story structure that was not hit by a plane but collapsed within seven seconds on September 11, was on the phone to his insurance carrier attempting to convince them that the building should be brought down via controlled demolition.

Writing for Fox News, Jeffrey Scott Shapiro states, “I was working as a journalist for Gannett News at Ground Zero that day, and I remember very clearly what I saw and heard.”

“Shortly before the building collapsed, several NYPD officers and Con-Edison workers told me that Larry Silverstein, the property developer of One World Financial Center was on the phone with his insurance carrier to see if they would authorize the controlled demolition of the building – since its foundation was already unstable and expected to fall.”

In February of 2002 Silverstein Properties won $861 million from Industrial Risk Insurers to rebuild on the site of WTC 7. Silverstein Properties’ estimated investment in WTC 7 was $386 million. This building’s collapse alone resulted in a payout of nearly $500 million, based on the contention that it was an unforeseen accidental event.

“A controlled demolition would have minimized the damage caused by the building’s imminent collapse and potentially save lives. Many law enforcement personnel, firefighters and other journalists were aware of this possible option. There was no secret. There was no conspiracy,” writes Shapiro.

However, obviously aware of how it would impact his insurance claim, Larry Silverstein has consistently denied that there was ever a plan to intentionally demolish Building 7.

In June 2005, Silverstein told New York Post journalist Sam Smith that his infamous “pull it” comment, which has been cited as proof that Silverstein planned to take down the building with explosives, “meant something else”.

In January 2006, Silverstein’s spokesperson Dara McQuillan told the U.S. State Departmentthat the “pull it” comment meant to withdraw firefighters from the building (despite the fact that there were no firefighters inside WTC 7 as we shall later cover). There was no mention whatsoever of any plan to demolish the building before it fell.

Shapiro’s faux pas has unwittingly let the cat out of the bag on the fact that Silverstein was aggressively pushing for the building to be intentionally demolished, a claim that he has always vociferously denied, presumably to safeguard against putting in doubt the massive insurance payout he received on the basis that the collapse was accidental.

For over five years since the infamous PBS documentary was aired in which Silverstein states that the decision was made to “pull” the building, a construction term for controlled demolition, debunkers have attempted to perform all kinds of mental gymnastics in fudging the meaning behind the WTC leaseholder’s comments.

“I remember getting a call from the fire department commander, telling me that they were not sure they were gonna be able to contain the fire, and I said, ‘We’ve had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it. And they made that decision to pull and we watched the building collapse,” said Silverstein.

Debunkers attempted to claim that Silverstein meant to “pull” the firefighters from the building due to the danger the structure was in, and this explanation was also later claimed by Silverstein’s spokesman, however, both the FEMA report, the New York Times and evenPopular Mechanics reported that there were no firefighting actions taken inside WTC 7.

Another clip from the same documentary clearly illustrates that the term “pull” is industry jargon for a controlled demolition.

“While I was talking with a fellow reporter and several NYPD officers, Building 7 suddenly collapsed, and before it hit the ground, not a single sound emanated from the tower area. There were no explosives; I would have heard them. In fact, I remember that in those few seconds, as the building sank to the ground that I was stunned by how quiet it was,” writes Shapiro in his Fox News hit piece.

Shapiro’s contention that the 47-story building simply collapsed into its own footprint within seven seconds without making a sound, a feat only ever witnessed in world history on 9/11 alone, is contradicted by numerous other first-hand eyewitnesses.

Contradicting Shapiro’s claim that the collapse of the building was quiet, NYPD officer Craig Bartmer stated that he clearly heard bombs tear down Building 7 as he ran away from its collapse.

“I walked around it (Building 7). I saw a hole. I didn’t see a hole bad enough to knock a building down, though. Yeah there was definitely fire in the building, but I didn’t hear any… I didn’t hear any creaking, or… I didn’t hear any indication that it was going to come down. And all of a sudden the radios exploded and everyone started screaming ‘get away, get away, get away from it!’… It was at that moment… I looked up, and it was nothing I would ever imagine seeing in my life. The thing started pealing in on itself… Somebody grabbed my shoulder and I started running, and the shit’s hitting the ground behind me, and the whole time you’re hearing “boom, boom, boom, boom, boom.” I think I know an explosion when I hear it… Yeah it had some damage to it, but nothing like what they’re saying… Nothing to account for what we saw… I am shocked at the story we’ve heard about it to be quite honest,” said Bartmer.

EMT Indira Singh, a Senior Consultant for JP Morgan Chase in Information Technology and Risk Management, told the Pacifica show Guns and Butter, “After midday on 9/11 we had to evacuate that because they told us Building 7 was coming down. If you had been there, not being able to see very much just flames everywhere and smoke – it is entirely possible – I do believe that they brought Building 7 down because I heard that they were going to bring it down because it was unstable because of the collateral damage.”

The host asked Singh, “Did they actually use the word “brought down” and who was it that was telling you this?,” to which Singh responded, “The fire department. And they did use the words ‘we’re gonna have to bring it down’ and for us there observing the nature of the devastation it made total sense to us that this was indeed a possibility, given the subsequent controversy over it I don’t know.”

Another EMT named Mike who wished to remain anonymous wrote in a letter to the Loose Change film crew that emergency responders were told Building 7 was about to be “pulled” and that a 20 second radio countdown preceded its collapse.

“There were bright flashes up and down the sides of Building 7, you could see them through the windows…and it collapsed. We all knew it was intentionally pulled… they told us,” he stated.

Following news reports in the days after the attack that Building 7 had collapsed due to fire damage, Mike fully expected this mistake to be corrected after the chaos had subsided, but was astonished when it became part of the official story.

Mike’s report of a countdown preceding the collapse of WTC 7 was backed up by Former Air Force Special Operations for Search and Rescue, Kevin McPadden, who said that he heard the last few seconds of the countdown on a nearby police radio.

In addition, the language used by firefighters and others at ground zero shortly before the building fell strongly indicates that the building was deliberately demolished with explosives, and not that it fell unaided.

“It’s blowin’ boy.” … “Keep your eye on that building, it’ll be coming down soon.” … “The building is about to blow up, move it back.” … “Here we are walking back. There’s a building, about to blow up…”

Photo and video evidence of the collapse of Building 7 shows classic indications of a controlled demolition. The standard ‘crimp’ in the center-left top of the building and the subsequent ’squibs’ of smoke as it collapses clearly represent explosive demolition.

Veteran news anchor Dan Rather shared the view that the building looked like a controlled demolition during news coverage of the event on CBS.

Several news agencies, including the BBC and CNN, reported that the building had already collapsed 26 minutes and as much as over an hour before it actually fell.

Footage broadcast 20 minutes before Building 7 fell shows BBC reporter Jane Standley talking about the collapse of WTC 7 while it remains standing in the live shot behind her head. A Separate BBC broadcast shows reporters discussing the collapse of Building 7 26 minutes before it happened.

Just about every sentence of Shapiro’s hit piece is contradicted by numerous other eyewitnesses, so his feigned righteous indignation in ranting, “I was there. I know what happened, and there is no single credible piece of evidence that implicates the United States of America in the Sept. 11 attacks,” fails to ring true.

However, the most damning aspect of the article is Shapiro’s inadvertent revelation that Larry Silverstein was on the phone to his insurance company pushing for the building to be demolished, which is precisely what happened later in the day, and as innumerable eyewitnesses as well as video footage and physical evidence prove, the collapse of WTC 7 could have been nothing else than a controlled demolition, which would place Silverstein’s $500 million insurance payout in severe jeopardy if ever acknowledged.

Shapiro’s testimony, intended to debunk questions surrounding the official story behind 9/11, has only succeeded in raising more, because it completely contradicts Larry Silverstein’s insistence that he never considered deliberately demolishing WTC 7 with explosives.

Member Login

Forgot Password?

Join Us