BREAKING: What Really Happened In Istanbul Turkey

Published on Jun 28, 2016

In this video Luke Rudkowski talks about the breaking news from Istanbul Turkey as he gives you his take about what lead to this event. Please fact check everything by checking the description below.


Support WeAreChange by Subscribing to our channel HERE…

Visit our main site for more breaking news
SnapChat: LukeWeAreChange

Rep WeAreChange Merch Proudly:

OH YEAH since we are not corporate or government WHORES help us out

We take BITCOIN too

Danny F. Quest, is an artist, blogger, journalist, and media personality. Co. Founder of, Danny works as a Freelance journalist and graphic designer for, is currently working on publishing the WeAreChange memoir with Brian Kenny, If you would like to contribute to getting our book out click this link

Meet the Journalist who conceal the Bilderberger’s Secrets

Meet the Journalist who conceal the Bilderberg’s Secrets

Bilderberg Preff

( In case you missed it, the widely controversial annual meeting of world elites started today in Dresden Germany, this years Bilderberg Attendee’s include Prime Ministers, heads of banking cartels, Sen Lindsey Graham, as well as CEO’s and Chairman of major companies such as Linked-In, Honeywell, and Royal Dutch Shell. But who else could be there? In a controversial election season, mainstream media has showed its hand in keeping things status quo, but now they arbitrarily decide to cover up world events by proxy. How can we trust media outlets, if they attend and cover up the secrets of the rich and powerful?
Several international media moguls, from Spain and Italy, as well as editors in chiefs from Bloomberg, The Economist, Minton Beddoes, Zanny and La7 TV, Gruber, Lilli. Even April Applebaum, a Washington Post Columnist and McArdle, Megan a Bloomberg Columnist.

First Day Of Bilderberg Arrivals, Bilderberg 2016 participants  caught Entering Hotel

NBC’s chief foreign correspondent Richard Engel is also in attendance, Cebrián, Juan Luis Executive Chairman, PRISA and El País
but none of these so called journalist are there to inform the masses of what is happening at this historic private secret meeting. No they are there to be apart of the secrecy.
A full list of participants for Bilderberg 2016 can be found here at the We Are Change website .

When a group of rich and powerful meet in one place, under a heavy veil of secrecy, what can the general public assume they are meeting about?  Various top economists and Bank moguls are also in attendance, raising the question. 

Why would various banking moguls meet once a year and collude in secrecy unless they are deciding or influencing future events?
Former Secretary of State under Reagan and Ford, Henry Kissinger famously said, “The illegal we do immediately. The unconstitutional takes a little longer,” is also in attendance this year, as many years prior.
If 120 people get together, of the most powerful and richest sorts, do you honestly feel they are working in your benefit? Do you truly buy that they will fight for us, in a 5 star hotel, paid for and protected by local law enforcement who are harassing journalist and researchers freaking reporters covering the event?

Luke also talked to 2 brave journalist Charlie Skeleton (@Deyook) who works at the Guardian and Tony Gosling (@TonyGosling) an ex BBC journalist. Both gave their view of why the mainstream press needs to start covering Bilderberg. Tony Gosling expressed that if he was still working at the BBC he would be putting this live on television.
Charlie Skeleton also argued in favor of supporting transparency in the main stream media regarding the Bilderberg group, saying its definitely a big political summit raising questions about the possibility of lobbying with so many influential people meeting in one place at one time. Charlie expressed that the Bilderberger’s want us to think its a conspiracy theory, to distract from the factual and rational information saying “that you hear a few of the Bilderberger’s insider’s using conspiracy theory rhetoric to talk to the press to frame the meeting.” Which iv personally been advocating for years and is the reason for my Twitter handle “Akilluminati” to kill the conspiracy talks that the Elite are Illuminated and apart of a group called Illuminati and to put name’s on these Elite and to name the groups themselves that are documented to exist today. Like skull and bones, the CFR, Trilateral Commission, the Round table, Zionist and the Bilderberg group so kill the conspiracy theory show the factual information that several groups have influence in our world through secret societies..
Both Video Interviews by Luke of Charlie Skeleton and Tony Gosling are below.

McArdle, Megan (USA), Columnist, Bloomberg View
Micklethwait, John (USA), Editor-in-Chief, Bloomberg LP
Minton Beddoes, Zanny (GBR), Editor-in-Chief, The Economist
Gruber, Lilli (ITA), Editor-in-Chief and Anchor “Otto e mezzo”, La7 TV
Engel, Richard (USA), Chief Foreign Correspondent, NBC News
Applebaum, Anne (USA), Columnist Washington Post; Director of the Transitions Forum, Legatum Institute
Cebrián, Juan Luis (ESP), Executive Chairman, PRISA and El País

Frm BBC Journalist: Why Bilderberg Won’t Allow BREXIT:

How Relevant Is Bilderberg?:

Full Bilderberg confrontations playlist here — > What Where You Doing At Bilderberg ??? 

“He who is not courageous enough to take risks will accomplish nothing in life.”
~Muhammad Ali

Blue Dark


Bilderberg Conspirators Arrive With Dark Clouds of Filth

Journalist Threatened With Violence By Police For Reporting On Bilderberg

First Day of Bilderberg Group Arrivals 2016

© (2016)

I am an Activist a writer a blogger and an investigative journalist writing for (

A Radio host of the Blog-talk Radio Series:

My Sources are everywhere..
Enemy of the New World Order.

A Wave of Social Media Arrests Sweep Through London

Arrests For Social Media Posts Surge In London

Sharing is scaring, say the cops

London is increasingly slapping people with prosecutions for reckless, aggressive or plain hateful language on social media.

“Online crimes of speech” are landing a growing number of people in London’s courts, according to data reported by the city’s police force in response to a Freedom of Information Request. While these types of arrests seemed to be on the decline between 2010 and 2013, a surge was observed again last year.

The Register reports that the number of arrests made for obscene, anxiety-causing, and otherwise offensive messages has increased by 37 percent since 2010. The most common type of these arrests is for “Sending messages intended to offend or menace,” accounting for over 60 percent of all crimes included under Section 127 of the Communications Act 2003. This controversial bit of legislation broadly defines illegal communication as “using public electronic communications network in order to cause annoyance, inconvenience or needless anxiety,” a definition that could, frankly, apply to pretty much every website on earth at some point, particularly Britain’s own Daily Mail. Violating this law can carry a six-month prison term or fine of up to the equivalent of $5,500.

Arrests under Section 127 of the UK Communications Act are rising

The arrests were all made under the same legislation which spawned the UK’s infamous Twitter Joke Trial. Using just 135 characters, 28-year-old Paul Chambers tweeted a joke that would go on to capture the country’s attention.

“Crap! Robin Hood airport is closed. You’ve got a week and a bit to get your shit together, otherwise I’m blowing the airport sky-high!!”

The “joke tweet” was initially deemed not credible by the airport staff that came across it, but police determined that it was enough to warrant an arrest, leading to a precedent-setting guilty verdict. In an essay for The Guardian, Chambers admitted that his frustrated tweet was “ill-advised,” but stated that the initial conviction caused him to believe that he lives

“In such a hyper-sensitive world that we cannot engage in hyperbole…without having civil liberties trampled on by, at best, heavy-handed police.”

two teens arrested for Facebook bullying

The case was eventually quashed on appeal (two years and several thousand pounds after the entire ordeal began) and the legislation in question was amended to include interim guidelines on how social media can and should be prosecuted. Under these guidelines, criminal prosecution was made limited to credible threats of violence, harassment, or stalking. Chambers’ threat was deemed not credible, given the audience.

In more recent years, the legislation has been used to arrest Twitter users responsible for making racist or anti-Muslim comments. Among the scores of those recently arrested for inflammatory posts was a Scottish resident who had been using Facebook as a platform to espouse his disdain for Syrian refugees.

Meeting the problem at its source, some British police departments have taken to social media platforms to remind citizens to “think before” posting offensive material.

While citizens of the United Kingdom have largely unimpinged-upon internet access, the most recent Freedom on the Net report states that there is a higher degree of content limitations there than in the U.S. Online harassment remains a problem throughout the world, and the UK is no exception. A recent study found that the words ‘slut’ and ‘whore’ were used by UK Twitter users 10,000 times in merely three weeks.

But if you want to avoid a brush with the British law, there’s one golden rule. If in doubt, don’t tweet it out.

Facebook Tells the Cops When You Talk About Criminal Activity in Private Messages

This Information was found at


Danny F. Quest, is an artist, blogger, journalist, and media personality. Co. Founder of, Danny works as a Freelance journalist and graphic designer for, is currently working on publishing the WeAreChange memoir with Brian Kenny, If you would like to contribute to getting our book out click this link

Facebook censors reporter for mentioning Facebook censorship

Facebook Censors Conservative Lauren Southern for Mentioning Facebook Censorship

We wish this wasn’t true – but it looks like Mark Zuckerberg’s message hasn’t got through to Facebook’s employees. Conservative activist and Donald Trump supporter Lauren Southern was just kicked off the site for a totally inoffensive post noting its censorship of another conservative reporter.

Maybe you think She Said Something Offensive or against Facebooks Terms of Service ?

Laura censor1

Conservative media chiefs were not happy:

Lauren detailed the length of her punishment:

Laurn censor 2








Some Leftist Liberals on Twitter accused Lauren of lying, but apologized when she showed them video:

laurn 4

however, Lauren had the perfect reply:

To his credit, Scahill did apologize:

Lauren was gracious as to be expected. ?

The more important question is what is Mark Zuckerberg going to do now to prove to Glenn Beck and others that he was not lying to their faces?



Danny F. Quest, is an artist, blogger, journalist, and media personality. Co. Founder of, Danny works as a Freelance journalist and graphic designer for, is currently working on publishing the WeAreChange memoir with Brian Kenny, If you would like to contribute to getting our book out click this link

Former Facebook Employees Confess To Suppressing Conservative News

Mark Zuckerberg

A former “curator” for Facebook’s trending topics section is speaking out about how conservative news stories that would organically trend on the platform were often censored from making the coveted list of top stories.

Speaking on the condition of anonymity to Gizmodo — out of fear of retribution from Facebook — the former curator and journalist explained that stories on topics such as the CPAC gathering, Mitt Romney, and Rand Paul, were frequently suppressed from making the influential list.

“Depending on who was on shift, things would be blacklisted or trending,” the former curator, who is also conservative, told Gizmodo. “I’d come on shift and I’d discover that CPAC or Mitt Romney or Glenn Beck or popular conservative topics wouldn’t be trending because either the curator didn’t recognize the news topic or it was like they had a bias against Ted Cruz.”

Facebook has publicly maintained that they are neutral when it comes to politics, but the claims from their curator team significantly counter that narrative.

“I believe it had a chilling effect on conservative news,” the former curator continued.

Additionally, if right-wing news site such as Red State broke a story, and Facebook did decide to feature it, they would look for it on a neutral website to promote instead of the original source.

“It was absolutely bias. We were doing it subjectively. It just depends on who the curator is and what time of day it is,” they explained. “Every once in awhile a Red State or conservative news source would have a story. But we would have to go and find the same story from a more neutral outlet that wasn’t as biased.”

Facebook was not only suppressing stories either, they were also encouraged to use an “injection tool” to manually insert trending topics that were not causing enough discussion to make the list on their own. This would often result in the story making the top trending item, even if it wouldn’t have by its own merits.

“We were told that if we saw something, a news story that was on the front page of these ten sites, like CNN, the New York Times, and BBC, then we could inject the topic,” said one former curator. “If it looked like it had enough news sites covering the story, we could inject it—even if it wasn’t naturally trending.”

This was done especially in the case of breaking news, which the platform has struggled with keeping up with Twitter on.

“We would get yelled at if it was all over Twitter and not on Facebook,” another former curator told the tech website.

This was also true for hashtags, specifically, Black Lives Matter, the movement which CEO Mark Zuckerberg personally endorsed in February.

“Facebook got a lot of pressure about not having a trending topic for Black Lives Matter,” the individual said. “They realized it was a problem, and they boosted it in the ordering. They gave it preference over other topics. When we injected it, everyone started saying, ‘Yeah, now I’m seeing it as number one’.”

These allegations are especially chilling given Zuckerberg’s public criticism of Republican front runner Donald Trump last month — as well as reports that Facebook employees were asking for discussion regarding the responsibility the company had to “prevent President Trump in 2017.”

Facebook responded and denied the allegations in a statement to Buzzfeed and TechCrunch late Monday afternoon, but did not reply to inquiries from Gizmodo — who broke the story.

“We take allegations of bias very seriously. Facebook is a platform for people and perspectives from across the political spectrum. Trending Topics shows you the popular topics and hashtags that are being talked about on Facebook. There are rigorous guidelines in place for the review team to ensure consistency and neutrality. These guidelines do not permit the suppression of political perspectives. Nor do they permit the prioritization of one viewpoint over another or one news outlet over another. These guidelines do not prohibit any news outlet from appearing in Trending Topics.”

Cassandra Fairbanks is a DC-based writer and political commentator who has been published in a range of outlets including Sputnik News, Teen Vogue, TeleSUR, and Bipartisan Report.

Pin It on Pinterest