Both Vice and Cracked.com have recently released articles downplaying the severity of pedophilia, and claiming that pedophiles who do not physically harm children simply suffer from a “mental disorder.”
The Cracked.com article “5 Things I Learned From Being Addicted To Child Porn” opens up with potentially the most disgusting way to attempt to justify pedophilia. It claims pedophiles don’t actually harm anyone, and that they are only looking at images, claiming “a pedophile is someone attracted to prepubescent children, while a child molester is someone who sexually abuses them.”
What the article fails to acknowledge in that first sentence is that in many cases the pedophiles are “just looking” at children who are being abused. As the story noted, a writer for the site named Cezary Strusiewicz researched and found “a shitload of people dedicated to raping and victimizing children and also finding new ways to do it.”
“The difference between pedophilia and child molestation is a conversation that absolutely nobody wants to have. It’s depressing enough to contemplate people being sexually attracted to children without getting into which model of windowless van they prefer. But they say knowledge is power, so let’s power up.
A pedophile is someone attracted to prepubescent children, while a child molester is someone who sexually abuses them. Although not every pedophile will molest a child, most of them look at child pornography, which obviously hurts the children forced to participate in it. Unfortunately, demand is high. To understand this problem better, we reached out to one of the consumers. We spoke to “Charlie,” who’s been arrested twice for possession of child pornography. He’s not looking for sympathy, or trying to play the victim.”
The author of the story, Strusiewicz, attempts to justify pedophilia by interviewing a convicted pedophile named “Charlie.” While the author initially tries to play it off as “an addiction,” he later writes, “Remember, calling child porn an addiction doesn’t justify it; it only helps us understand the problem better, and it may even help us find a way to stop non-offending pedophiles from ditching that vital prefix.”
Strusiewicz then claimed that “pedophilia is most likely hardwired in the brain.” In a section of the story titled, “The Sex Offender Registry Is Bizarre and Somewhat Arbitrary,“ he writes:
“Charlie had no hand in making child pornography. He didn’t personally know the kids in the stuff he watched. He got it randomly off the web. This, however, complicated things when the state was determining his sex offender level. It was decided by a number of points. You would get X amount of points, depending on the age of the victim. The lower it was, the more points you got. And the more points you got, the more trouble you were in.”
The next heading takes the cake with “Overall, We Don’t Know Much About Child Porn, Addiction, And Pedophilia.” Are you kidding me? At this point, I wanted to smash my expensive 144Hz monitor after reading this, but I decided that would be counter-productive. So I continued reading, “Sometimes, the best way to solve a problem is to examine the root cause of it. But in this case, the root cause is massively depressing and examining it makes you want to die.”
“As of now, Charlie is keeping his affliction in check. ‘I can honestly say that this is the first time in my life that I am not looking at child porn, and I feel great. My life is looking up. I’m not depressed, and I don’t hate myself as much as I used to.’ But like with any addiction, it’s still on his mind, and will probably be there forever. I know that if I looked at it again, even once, then I’d be on the fast track to prison, and I’d go through the same cycle over again.”
Oh, a happy ending! The pedophile finally broke free and stopped watching child porn after the author spent a decent part of the article trying to justify it.
The of the story, “5 Things I Learned Infiltrating Deep Web Child Molesters” had a little more common sense, that is until I read the following. Then I lost it and almost went full Hillary Clinton on my monitor:
“You have to learn to disassociate your thinking of pedophilia with hurting or abusing children. You have been brought up to, not talk to strangers etc when you was a child because your parents who think pedos hurt children passed that idea on to you & now your mind is confused …
The truth is, some people do hurt children but the majority of pedophiles (paedophile is latin for child lover — paed=child & phile=love) love children and would not hurt them or harm them in any way.”
I thought the stupidity was over, but found that I was wrong. This author also tried to justify pedophilia by writing, “some lovely soul tweeted to us an earnest defense of child molestation with these two key points of indestructible logic – children have sex with each other and Pedophilia means child friend.”
I then literally had to take a step away from my computer before it became like one of the State Department’s Blackberries.
“We’ve actually encountered this ourselves, by the way. After we did the aforementioned article with the pedophiles who were trying to undergo treatment to stop, some lovely soul tweeted to us an earnest defense of child molestation based around two key points of indestructible logic:
A) Children have sex with each other!
B) Pedophilia means “child friend.” No, really!”
The next part of the article is very sick and exposes why pedophilia can never be normalized. Author Robert Evans wrote that he encountered someone called “SarahTheCunt” who admitted that she molests her kids with her husband. “SarahTheCunt” and her husband began violating their daughter when she was just a newborn:
This is another way of saying they rape their children and convince them that they’re enjoying it. “She makes her own videos of that,” says Pam, “and she’s one of the (according to her) biggest child pornographers in her area. I don’t know where that area is because they are very tight-lipped about where they’re located.”
At that point, I could not continue reading. I started having flashbacks of being a vigilante online pedophile hunter who helped run the @ReportAPedo Twitter account and various Anonymous OpDarknet ops, and it brought back all of the horrific images I saw several years ago.
The pedophile is identified as Todd Nickerson. He opened up to the Vice reporter and said, “I kind of had to get over a lot of society’s BS, this idea that you’re doomed to offend. I had to say, ‘No, no. You’re not, you have control over that.’ We’re not slaves to our hormones.”
The Vice reporter then the had the audacity to say that not all child molesters are pedophiles:
“But not all people who commit sexual offenses against children are pedophiles. In fact, according to studies, between 40 to 75 percent are not. When it comes to child porn, however, closer to 80 percent are pedophiles.”
Vice then talked to a so-called expert on pedophilia, James Cantor. He said he has been studying pedophilia for years, and yet this what he has to say about it now:
“There are people who are pedophilic, they know they’re attracted to children, and never touch a child, never download any kind of child pornography, they never break any kind of law,” says James Cantor, a Toronto-based clinical psychologist and sexual behavior scientist who has been studying pedophilia for 20 years.
It also works the other way around. There are people who are child molesters, they actually committed crimes and victimized someone even though they sexually prefer adults.” These people are sometimes referred to as surrogate sex offenders, Cantor explains, who use children to replace an adult sexual partner.”
But wait, there’s more! Cantor also said, “Based on the tactics used by vigilantes, the majority of the people vigilantes bust are hebephiles or ephebophiles.”
Vice then makes one of the dumbest claims I have ever read:
“Research shows pedophiles are more likely to be left-handed.” It doesn’t even include a citation for this alleged “research.”
Next, Nickerson said that the only time he faced temptation was when he was 18 years old, and was babysitting a 5-year-old girl. What a sick f*ck.
“She would take her clothes off and run through the house. That girl was the only time in my life that I faced real temptation.”
The film then cuts to three prisoners who have been accused of spying making video “confessions,” before showing an abandoned and broken down amusement park where they will soon be killed by the caliphate’s child “cubs,” as the organization calls their youngest recruits.
The first execution features a boy who appears to be approximately 7-years-old and wearing camouflage, sawing through the the throat of one of the men who is bound to a spinning ride. After the man is completely beheaded, the ride slowly spins with his head on the floor.
The next scene features the second prisoner tied to a nearly empty and decrepit ball pit, with a child in all black ISIS attire who appears to be approximately three or four years old. The tiny child, surrounded by the broken playthings, is then handed a small gun by an adult member of the group. The boy shakily shoots the prisoner five times before shouting “Allahu akbar” twice.
The final execution is carried out by a boy of roughly 10-12 years old, as the tiniest jihadist looks on. Just before the pre-teen beheads their victim, the younger boy makes a cutting motion across his throat.
The middle-school aged child then saws the man’s head off, before sticking the knife into his back.
At least one of the victims is believed to be from the Kurdish group PKK.
The violent and graphic film also features the children in their training, and waving the black ISIS flag.
Just before the start of the new year, the terrorist organization had also released a video featuring child jihadists as young as nine hunting down bound prisoners inside an abandoned building and executing them.
Cassandra Fairbanks is a DC-based writer and political commentator who has been published in a range of outlets including Sputnik News, Teen Vogue, TeleSUR, the International Business Times, and Bipartisan Report.
Unbelievable news today as the current CEO of the New York Times Mark Thompson during a recent speech asked for subsidize for the main stream media because of fake news. In this video Luke Rudkowski broke down the entire argument and the horrible criminal behavior of Mark Thompson along with the NYT. Vote with your dollar and support us on https://wearechange.org/donate/ so we can expand our operations in this critically important time of oncoming censorship.
John Chancellor reports for NBC on 11 October 1977 about clandestine operations of CIA regarding its interest in kids. These camps were to bring together children from around world for better understanding of one another.
(Studio) Recent revelations with regard to clandestine operations of CIA noted. Special report on the interest of the organization in children. REPORTER: John Chancellor
(No location given) (Home movie film of children at European camp of Children’s International Summer Village, taken in 1950’s, is shown.) These camps were to bring together children from around world for better understanding of one another. Has been learned that CIA was studying children in camps at Hammerfest, Norway and Vienna, Austria, for possible future recruits. According. to documents examined by reporter, this was part of CIA’s MK Ultra project. Details of CIA documents with regard to camps cited; no one running camps had knowledge of CIA’s interest, according to documents. American director for camps was Dr. Doris Twichallelan, who now lives in Trenton, ME.
TWICHALLELAN – is stunned to find out about this; was being used.] Has also been learned CIA paid for study of adolescents in San Antonio, Austin, and El Paso, Texas; details noted. Again, no one running program knew of CIA involvement. Prof. Carolyn Sharrif was one of authors of study; didn’t know of CIA funding, until told by reporter
SHARRIF – feels she’s been lied to by own government Cites concerns as researcher and as taxpayer.] Both studies were financed through Society for Investigation of Human Ecology, CIA front organization until mid-1960’s. Executive director of Society, James Monroe, says reason for studies was to get basic knowledge of humans.
REPORTER: Paul Altmeyer
Four of the MKULTRA Subprojects involved research on children; 102, 103, 112, and 117. Only one of these, Subproject 117, involved an investigator with TOP SECRET clearance. The fact that the CIA funded research on children has not been documented previously. Given that the mind control research declassified to date is certainly an incomplete account of everything done, it is unknown whether other mind control experimentation was unethical or harmful. An unanswered question is whether children were ever subjects in Manchurian Candidate experiments.
The four MKULTRA Subprojects on children were suposedly benign and did not involve unethical experiments. Subproject 102 was conducted by Muzafer Sherif of the University of Oklahoma. It involved studies of social processes in teenage gangs in two cities. Subjects were 14 to 17 years of age and were studied by having social science students “hang out” with them. One student showed up at a basketball court with a new basketball and explained that he wanted to exercise to lose some weight. Observations were made about how group cohesiveness was maintained, how members were selected, status ranking of members, behavioral sanctions within the group, and similar matters. The CIA’s interest in this Subproject is not stated in the documents, but one can assume it was relevant to understanding and manipulating social groups during psychological warfare and propaganda operations.
Subproject 103 was conducted by Robert Cormack and A.B. Kristofferson at the Children’s International Summer Villages, Inc. in Maine. The subjects were 16 to 21 years of age and were there for a reunion; all had attended the camp in previous years as 11-year olds. The academic purpose of the project was to study how children communicate when they do not share a common language. The CIA was interested in the project as a cover for establishing relationships with children from a variety of countries. Obviously, the intent was to recruit them as agents or assets. A MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD from the Subproject 103 documents dated 10 December 1959 states that” > It is felt that this project will support the [whited out] need for cover. In addition it will assist in the identification of promising young foreign nationals and U.S. nationals (many of whom are now in their late teens) who may at any time be of direct interest to the Agency…. No cleared or witting persons are concerned with the conduct of this project.
The principal investigator for MKULTRA Subproject 112 was Melvin DeFleur of the the University of Indiana. He studied perceptions of occupational roles in children from first to eighth grades. According to a MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD dated 24 march 1960, the CIA’s “interest is connected with the current problems of vocational guidance with possible applications to the selection of technical and scientific careers.”
1. Electronic Mind Control report of Electronic Mind Control. Electronic Mind Control Letter dated March 1, 2001 from a Hypnotic Mind controlled person http://www. … distance, can control the thoughts and http://www.apfn.org/apfn/electronic.htm
2. NSA Mind Control and Psyops NSA Mind Control and Psyops NSA Mind Control and Psyops by Will Filer … explanation for government mind control. Will has stated to … develop and control spies, political candidates http://www.apfn.org/apfn/MC.htm
3. Secrets of the Federal Reserve “HISTORICAL BEGINNINGS . . . . THE FEDERAL RESERVE” Secrets of the Federal Reserve and the London Connection by Eustace Mullins SECRETS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SECRETS OF THE FEDERAL http://www.apfn.org/apfn/reserve.htm
4. Satanic Cult Sex Drug Ring Gosch, CIA MK-Ultra Mind Control, and Iran-Contra. 3. Two June … CIA MK-Ultra Mind Control, Iran-Contra, and new arrests … CIA MK-Ultra Mind Control, and prominent political figures. http://www.apfn.org/apfn/ring.htm
5. Mind Control Mind Control Letter dated March 1, 2001 from a Hypnotic Mind controlled person http://www.apfn.org/pdf … to surface concerning mind control was that of Cathy O’Brien, involving http://www.apfn.org/apfn/mind.htm
Bayer sold HIV and Hep C infected products to the United States in the 1980s. After some 10,000 were infected, they recalled the products and resold them in Asian and Latin American countries.
What if a company that you thought you could trust, knowingly sold you a medicine for your child that they knew had the potential to give your child HIV? How would you react? What if a government agency that claims the responsibility for protecting you from such treachery, not only looked the other way, but was complicit in this exchange?
Everyone has heard of Bayer aspirin, it is a household name. Bayer AG also manufactures numerous other products, from pesticides to medicine for hemophiliacs called Factor 8.
In 1984 Bayer became aware that several batches of this Factor 8 contained HIV. They knew this because there was an outbreak of HIV among hemophiliac children, and this outbreak was traced back to Bayer. Unable to sell their Factor 8 in the US, Bayer, with the FDA’s permission, (yes that’s right, the FDA allowed Bayer to potentially kill thousands) sold this HIV infected medicine to Argentina, Indonesia, Japan, Malaysia, and Singapore after February 1984, according to the documents obtained by the NY Times.
The Bayer unit, Cutter Biological, introduced its safer medicine in late February 1984 as evidence mounted that the earlier version was infecting hemophiliacs with H.I.V. Yet for over a year, the company continued to sell the old medicine overseas, prompting a United States regulator to accuse Cutter of breaking its promise to stop selling the product.
The documents showed how Cutter Biological, a division of Bayer, shipped more than 100,000 vials of unheated concentrate, worth more than $4 million, after it began selling the safer product. The result of this sale of HIV tainted medication ended up infecting tens of thousands and killing thousands. Thousands of innocent children and adults have died at the hand of this corporation and no punitive action has been taken against them. The health department leaders in Argentina, Indonesia, Japan, Malaysia, and Singapore were all imprisoned, while the US FDA continues down its hellish path. When asked about the sale of the tainted Factor 8, Bayer responded, ”Decisions made nearly two decades ago were based on the best scientific information of the time and were consistent with the regulations in place.”
This can be interpreted as Bayer asking the FDA for permission to murder children for profit and the FDA giving its approval. According to the NY Times, the Food and Drug Administration’s regulator of blood products, Dr. Harry M. Meyer Jr., asked that the issue be ”quietly solved without alerting the Congress, the medical community and the public.” No one in the government nor Bayer have been charged with anything in regards to this matter. Bayer continues to sell its Factor 8 medication to this day.