CDC Scientists Blow The Whistle – Claim The Agency Has Been Influenced by ‘Rogue Interests’

There is a group of anonymous scientists at the US Centers for Disease Control—they call themselves the Spider Group—Scientists Preserving Integrity, Diligence and Ethics in Research. They have penned a letter to the CDC’s chief of staff, Carmen S. Villar:

Here is the explosive accusation they make:

“We are a group of scientists at CDC that are very concerned about the current state of ethics at our agency. It appears that our mission is being influenced and shaped by outside parties and rogue interests. It seems that our mission and Congressional intent for our agency is being circumvented by some of our leaders. What concerns us most, is that it is becoming the norm and not the rare exception.”

“Some senior management officials at CDC are clearly aware and even condone these behaviors. Others see it and turn the other way. Some staff are intimidated and pressed to do things they know are not right.”

“We have representatives from across the agency that witness this unacceptable behavior. It occurs at all levels and in all of our respective units. These questionable and unethical practices threaten to undermine our credibility and reputation as a trusted leader in public health.”

I have written at length about another whistleblower at the CDC, William Thompson, a long-time researcher who, in August of 2014, confessed in writing to massive fraud (archive here). He admitted that, in a study on the safety of the MMR vaccine, he and his colleagues literally threw vital sheets of data into a garbage can. The study then gave a free pass to the vaccine, claiming it had no connection to autism—when in fact it did. Thompson is the subject of the film, Vaxxed (trailer).

Now with this letter, we see that other scientists at the CDC are blowing the lid off internal corruption at their Agency.

If, in fact, President-elect Trump gives the green light for an independent investigation of the CDC, as press outlets are now reporting, and if he appoints Robert Kennedy Jr. to head up that panel, as Kennedy claims, we are going to see a large number of hidden facts emerge from the secretive halls of the CDC.

Because this Spider Group is anonymous, I wanted to make sure their letter is real. I contacted reporter Carey Gillam (twitter), who has been covering the story. I received this reply: “I was able to authenticate the letter by contacting CDC’s public affairs office and asking them directly about it after I received it from internal CDC sources.”

You can read the full Spider Group’s letter here at US Right To Know. (More on the letter by Carey Gillam here.)

And now I write a letter to them, so they can deepen their investigation.

Dear Spider Group:

I commend you on making an important start. You’re on the right road. As a reporter who has covered the CDC for many years, I offer you three suggestions. This short list is by no means exhaustive. I’m just pointing to a few areas where your own research will yield very rich and fertile results.


Let me take you back to the late summer of 2009, and the Swine Flu epidemic, which was hyped to the sky by the CDC. The Agency was calling for all Americans to take the Swine Flu vaccine. Remember?

The problem was, the CDC was concealing a scandal.

At the time, star CBS investigative reporter, Sharyl Attkisson, was working on a Swine Flu story. She discovered that the CDC had secretly stopped counting cases of the illness—while, of course, continuing to warn Americans about its unchecked spread.

The CDC’s main job is counting cases and reporting the numbers.

What was the Agency up to?

Here is an excerpt from my 2014 interview with Sharyl Attkisson:

Rappoport: In 2009, you spearheaded coverage of the so-called Swine Flu pandemic. You discovered that, in the summer of 2009, the Centers for Disease Control, ignoring their federal mandate, [secretly] stopped counting Swine Flu cases in America. Yet they continued to stir up fear about the “pandemic,” without having any real measure of its impact. Wasn’t that another investigation of yours that was shut down? Wasn’t there more to find out?

Attkisson: The implications of the story were even worse than that. We discovered through our FOI efforts that before the CDC mysteriously stopped counting Swine Flu cases, they had learned that almost none of the cases they had counted as Swine Flu was, in fact, Swine Flu or any sort of flu at all! The interest in the story from one [CBS] executive was very enthusiastic. He said it was “the most original story” he’d seen on the whole Swine Flu epidemic. But others pushed to stop it and, in the end, no broadcast wanted to touch it. We aired numerous stories pumping up the idea of an epidemic, but not the one that would shed original, new light on all the hype. It was fair, accurate, legally approved and a heck of a story. With the CDC keeping the true Swine Flu stats secret, it meant that many in the public took and gave their children an experimental vaccine that may not have been necessary.

—end of interview excerpt—

It was routine for doctors all over America to send blood samples from patients they’d diagnosed with Swine Flu, or the “most likely” Swine Flu patients, to labs for testing. And overwhelmingly, those samples were coming back with the result: not Swine Flu, not any kind of flu.

That was the big secret. That’s what the CDC was hiding. That’s why they stopped reporting Swine Flu case numbers. That’s what Attkisson had discovered. That’s why she was shut down.

But it gets even worse.

Because about three weeks after Attkisson’s findings were published on the CBS News website, the CDC, obviously in a panic, decided to double down. If one lie is exposed, tell an even bigger one. A much bigger one.

Here, from a November 12, 2009, WebMD article is the CDC’s response: “Shockingly, 14 million to 34 million U.S. residents — the CDC’s best guess is 22 million — came down with H1N1 swine flu by Oct. 17 [2009].” (“22 million cases of Swine Flu in US,” by Daniel J. DeNoon).

Are your eyeballs popping? They should be.

In the summer of 2009, the CDC secretly stops counting Swine Flu cases in America, because the overwhelming percentage of lab tests from likely Swine Flu patients shows no sign of Swine Flu or any other kind of flu.

There is no Swine Flu epidemic.

Then, the CDC estimates there are 22 MILLION cases of Swine Flu in the US.


If you wanted to buy a product, and the main source of research on the product was the company selling it, would you automatically assume the product was safe and effective?

But you see, that’s the just the beginning of the problem. Suppose the company’s research was cited thousands of times in the press, as the authoritative standard of proof—and anyone who disputed that research was labeled a conspiracy theorist and a quack and a danger to the community and an anti-science lunatic.

Would you begin to suspect the company had some awesome media connections? Would you suspect some very powerful people were backing the company?

This is exactly the situation that exists at the US Centers for Disease Control (CDC). Read these two quotes:

“The government’s Vaccine for Children Program (a CDC organization) purchases vaccines for about 50 percent of children in the U.S.” (The Atlantic, February 10, 2015)

“The CDC currently spends over $4 billion purchasing vaccines [annually] from drug makers…” (Health Impact News, October 24, 2016)

However, the CDC is also the gold standard for research on the safety and efficacy of vaccines. It turns out an unending stream of studies on these subjects. And the results of those studies are dutifully reported in the mainstream press.

Do you think, under any circumstances, the CDC would publish data showing vaccines are ineffective and dangerous? They’d be cutting their own throats.

“Well, we spend $4 billion a year buying vaccines from drug companies, but guess what? These vaccines are often dangerous…”

Every time you read about a CDC study on vaccines, keep this obvious (and clearly illegal) conflict of interest in mind.


In December of 2005, the British Medical Journal (online) published a shocking report by Peter Doshi, which created tremors through the halls of the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), where “the experts” used to tell the press that 36,000 people in the US die every year from the flu.

Here is a quote from Doshi’s report, “Are US flu death figures more PR than science?” (BMJ 2005; 331:1412):

“[According to CDC statistics], ‘influenza and pneumonia’ took 62,034 lives in 2001—61,777 of which were attributable to pneumonia and 257 to flu, and in only 18 cases was the flu virus positively identified.”


You see, the CDC has created one overall category that combines both flu and pneumonia deaths. Why do they do this? Because they disingenuously assume that the pneumonia deaths are complications stemming from the flu.

This is an absurd assumption. Pneumonia has a number of causes.

But even worse, in all the flu and pneumonia deaths, only 18 revealed the presence of an influenza virus.

Therefore, the CDC could not say, with assurance, that more than 18 people died of influenza in 2001. Not 36,000 deaths. 18 deaths.

Doshi continued his assessment of published CDC flu-death statistics: “Between 1979 and 2001, [CDC] data show an average of 1348 [flu] deaths per year (range 257 to 3006).” These figures refer to flu separated out from pneumonia.

This death toll is obviously far lower than the parroted 36,000 figure.

However, when you add the sensible condition that lab tests have to actually find the flu virus in patients, the numbers of flu deaths plummet even further.

In other words, it’s all promotion and hype.

“Well, uh, we say that 36,000 people die from the flu every year in the US. But actually, it’s closer to 20. However, we can’t admit that, because if we did, we’d be exposing our gigantic psyop. The whole campaign to scare people into getting a flu shot would have about the same effect as warning people to carry iron umbrellas, in case toasters fall out of upper-story windows…and, by the way, we’d be put in prison for fraud.”

The CDC must turn out a steady stream of outrageous lies about the need for vaccines. If they didn’t, they’d have no way to justify the billions of dollars they spend every year buying the vaccines from drug companies.

So, Spider Group, don’t stop now. Deepen your probe. Become true heroes for honest research, expose the deep roots of corruption in your Agency, and do the right thing for the American people you’re sworn to serve.

Delivered by The Daily Sheeple

We encourage you to share and republish our reports, analyses, breaking news and videos (Click for details).

Contributed by Jon Rappoport of No More Fake News.

The author of an explosive collection, THE MATRIX REVEALED, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world.

Project Veritas: Evidence Of Democratic Election Judges Pretending To Be Republican

“With all the talk of Russians hacking the election we are ignoring the election fraud that takes place on our own soil,” James O’Keefe said in the opening of the latest Project Veritas documentary.

The video gives exposes a massive flaw in the elected judges who monitor and help electors in Chicago in three separate polling locations. In it, an undercover Project Veritas journalist asks one of the judges, “What’s the difference, so Republican judge, what does that mean?” 

The woman identified as Keora Hill responded, “I don’t know. I did the training and this is what they told me I was.”

The PV journalist then asked, “and you don’t have to be a Republican to be a Republican Judge?”

Hill responded, “No, I hope not.”

O’Keefe then quoted Illinois state law which says, “there has to be five election judges a mixture of Democrats and Republicans.”

The undercover journalist asked Hill, “Can I just ask too, what the Republican Judge means?”

“Oh, you know what, I’m just a judge I get paid.” Hill said. “I just get paid. I don’t give a green flip. I don’t care what it means.”

The PV journalist pressed further, “But why does it have to be a Republican Judge, I don’t get that?”

Hill responded, “Oh, they have to have Republican and Democrats and yeah, that’s all.”

“But you don’t have to be a Republican?” the PV journalist asked.

“No. I’m a Democrat but I’m working under the Republicans,” Hill revealed. “You have to have so many Republicans and so many Democrats.”

[RELATED: The REAL Election Fraud: It’s All In Favor Of Hillary Clinton]

In another confrontation, the PV journalist talked to additional official named Joseph Johnson. She asked Johnson, “Oh, so you are a Republican?”

Johnson replied, “Technically, no but for this election it made me a Republican, yeah.”

The undercover journalist said, “Oh, so you voted for Trump?” and Johnson replied, “No, I didn’t vote for Trump.”

“Oh. Hillary? Yeah, that’s who I’m voting for. So, you voted for Hillary?” she then asked.

Yeah” Johnson admitted. “But you can vote…” he then begins to say shortly before being interrupted by the journalists who asked, “So, why do you have to be a Republican Judge?”

“That’s how the election… that’s how they sent it to me,” Johnson said. “They gave me my assignment, told me where I’m going and made me a Republican. I can’t say nothing about it. Do I vote Republican? No.”

At her final polling location, the undercover journalist asked a poll worker, “Excuse me, what are the judges? Like what is that?” 

The woman at the desk laughed. “I just keep seeing the stickers everywhere” the undercover journalist said

“We assist you to show you the process of voting.” The woman said.

The journalist responded, “Oh, so it’s not like legal judges?” The woman then retorted, “No, we got enough of those on the ballot, we’re just here to assist with your voting process.”

Once again, the undercover PV journalist asked the election official, “So are you voting for Trump, if you’re the Republican?”

Another poll worker replied, “Oh, no, we Democrats up in here!”

As O’Keefe said, “Democracy is messy and as you can see we have our own problems in our own country. During our own elections, let’s focus on these issues” before making claims about Russians hacking the election.


I am an Activist a writer a blogger and an investigative journalist writing for (

A Radio host of the Blog-talk Radio Series:

My Sources are everywhere..
Enemy of the New World Order.

BREAKING: Jill Stein Exposed For Corruption With DNC

Published on Nov 30, 2016

In this video Luke Rudkowski interviews Christina Tobin Founder and Chair at The Free and Equal Elections Foundation and former close friend of Jill Stein. In this episode we go over  some of the latest breaking news that our investigative journalists found out of direct collusion with the DNC and this years election recount.

For more on Christina check out

Green Party Opposes Jill Stein’s Recount Effort — Including Her Own Campaign’s Senior Advisor…

Gone Rogue? Jill Stein Hires DNC Lawyer For Michigan Recount Effort…

Gone Rogue? Jill Stein Hires DNC Lawyer For Michigan Recount Effort

Visit our MAIN SITE for more breaking news

SNAPCHAT: LukeWeAreChange

OH YEAH since we are not corporate or government WHORES help us out

We take BITCOIN too



December 2016 


Bernie Sanders’ Deputy Campaign Manager Threatens O’Keefe With Lawsuit

Bernie Sanders’ failed deputy campaign field manager Richard Pelletier is threatening Project Veritas and James O’Keefe with a lawsuit for allegedly illegally recording him during a phone call.

Pelletier is claiming that O’Keefe illegally recorded a phone conversation with Pelletier back in February of this year.

The call was part of an investigation Project Veritas Action did that produced compelling evidence that the Sanders Campaign was clearly violating federal campaign election laws by using Australians who were paid by the Australian Labor Party to circumvent federal election laws. These illegal volunteers were used to deface and destroy campaign signs of Bernie Sanders’ opponents Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton.

The story didn’t get much air play in the mainstream U.S. press, but in Australia it was front-page news in almost every major news paper and outlet.

A New Hampshire State Representative filed a formal complaint with the Federal Election Commission citing the PVA story. PVA is still waiting to hear from the FEC.

Federal election law is clear.  Foreign nationals can volunteer for campaigns but they must not be compensated like these Australians were.  The Australian volunteers had their airfare paid and they received a daily pay as well as getting their housing paid for.

“…and so like my flights, and my travel amounts is all paid for, technically by the taxpayer, so they have had issues in the past, where like if I post a photo of myself in front of the Statue of Liberty, and the next morning it will be on the front of a newspaper, they’d be like, you know like, ’21-year-old student uses tax payer’s money to go on holiday. Like, what a disgrace…  …There is nothing wrong with what I am doing here because the money is literally given to us for that sole reason, but if we post on social media it gives the current government an excuse to get rid of the program to save money.  If that makes sense,” Ben Kremer, said.

As James O’Keefe notes according to 52 U.S.C. ~30121, it “shall be unlawful for… …A foreign national, directly or indirectly, to make… …A contribution or donation of money or other thing of value, or to make an express or implied promise to make a contribution or donation, in connection with a Federal, State or local election.”

You can view the lawsuit here at Project Veritas Action’s website.

If you like news like this that you won’t get anywhere else consider donating through Patreon to help us keep this operation alive and fight back against the mainstream media, we work for you and get paid by you so we don’t have anyone lobbying against our stories we are fully independent.

I am an Activist a writer a blogger and an investigative journalist writing for (

A Radio host of the Blog-talk Radio Series:

My Sources are everywhere..
Enemy of the New World Order.

POPULAR VOTE TUG-OF-WAR: Did Millions Of Illegals Vote In 2016?

President-elect Donald Trump took Twitter by storm Sunday after he tweeted that illegal voters cost him the popular vote in the 2016 presidential election.

“In addition to winning the Electoral College in a landslide, I won the popular vote if you deduct the millions of people who voted illegally,” Trump said.

Trump’s tweets sent the mainstream media and many Democrats into various states of outrage and denial, with many retaliating in an outburst of vicious news stories, op-eds, and tweets. While the Clinton campaign joined Jill Stein’s effort for a recount that many are calling a scam, even President Barack Obama agrees Trump won (which says a lot). But some sore losers on the left are intent on holding out.

Consider some of the headlines below…

CNN also flagrantly abused journalistic principles (not that they ever had any) by calling Trump’s claim false, when an unbiased news source would call the claim “undetermined.” And not to be outdone by their pals, the Washington Post topped off the mass denial campaign with the screeching headline “Donald Trump’s new explanation for losing the popular vote? A Twitter-born conspiracy theory.

And of course there’s many, many more fake news outlets in the mainstream media that I won’t bother listing here, but all of them practically share the same theme: “Trumps a fool, a liar, a conspiracy theorist yada yada yada.”

Meanwhile, it’s almost certain that illegals did vote – and in significant numbers, like the millions.

A 2014 study in the online Electoral Studies Journal shows that in the 2008 and 2010 elections, illegal immigrant votes were in fact quite high.

“We find that some non-citizens participate in U.S. elections, and that this participation has been large enough to change meaningful election outcomes including Electoral College votes, and Congressional elections.”

Specifically, the authors show how illegals may have cast as many as 2.8 million votes in 2008 and 2010. That’s an awful lot of votes. And when you consider the population of illegal inhabitants has only grown exponentially since then, it’s not at all unreasonable to suppose that their vote has too – especially when facing a candidate that has vowed to deport them.

Caleb Stephen is a Christian conservative freelance journalist, columnist, political activist and the founder and Editor-In-Chief of The Caleb Report (
Caleb has written for and has articles published on world-renowned websites including World Net Daily (WND), The Daily Caller, The Huffington Post, The Times of Israel, The San Francisco Post, Intellihub, Natural News, Before It’s News and
He is an international reporter for
Visit his website and follow him on Twitter @CalebSOfficial

Pin It on Pinterest