5 Reasons Why The Summer of Chaos is Here…

The Summer of Chaos, as George Soros called it, is exploding all over the world. Terrorism in Europe, police shootings in the U.S., and clues of possible false flags spread over the whole mess. So what is fueling this global manifestation of rage?

  1. CONSTANT AND SUSTAINED OPPRESSION BY WESTERN GOVERNMENTS HAS CREATED CALLS FOR RETRIBUTION AGAINST THE GLOBAL ELITE’S POWER STRUCTURES
    https://youtu.be/BV9V-T2civ8I LOVE MY COUNTRY BUT HATE WHAT THEY ARE DOING from Good Pixel Productions on Vimeo.

For example, the U.S. government has been dominated by fractional groups of powerful elites, whose separate yet consolidated wealth has lorded over, dominated, subjugated and aimed to control the minds and bodies of people around the world.

The vast majority of the world is tired of American “democratic” intervention. In South American, Asia, Africa, and the Middle East, people have for decades felt the sting of American military imperialism. The assassinations of legitimately elected leaders like Iran’s Mohammed Mossadegh and Panama’s Omar Torrijos has created worldwide perception of the U.S. as a militaristic overlord. Many Western nations, especially U.S. allies in NATO,  are similarly viewed as evil oppressors.

The U.S. has bombed over 20 different countries since World War 2, and has been involved in the covert overthrows of countless others.  Here is a list of countries the USA has bombed since the end of World War II.

Ron Paul is the most prominent U.S. politician who has given an honest telling of this truth. Ron Paul was asked if he really wants the troops to come home, and whether that is really a Republican position.

“Well,” he said, “I think the party has lost its way, because the conservative wing of the Republican Party always advocated a non-interventionist foreign policy. Senator Robert Taft didn’t even want to be in NATO. George Bush won the election in the year 2000 campaigning on a humble foreign policy –no nation-building, no policing of the world. Republicans were elected to end the Korean War. The Republicans were elected to end the Vietnam War. There’s a strong tradition of being anti-war in the Republican party. It is the constitutional position. It is the advice of the Founders to follow a non-interventionist foreign policy, stay out of entangling alliances, be friends with countries, negotiate and talk with them and trade with them.”

He was then asked if 9-11 changed anything. He responded that US foreign policy was a “major contributing factor. Have you ever read the reasons they attacked us? They attacked us because we’ve been over there; we’ve been bombing Iraq for 10 years. We’ve been in the Middle East –I think Reagan was right. We don’t understand the irrationality of Middle Eastern politics. So right now we’re building an embassy in Iraq that’s bigger than the Vatican. We’re building 14 permanent bases. What would we say here if China was doing this in our country or in the Gulf of Mexico? We would be objecting. We need to look at what we do from the perspective of what would happen if somebody else did it to us. “

You reap what you sow as they say, and American Imperialism has dominated half of the globe with near impunity for far too long.

reap what you sow

2. The Rise Of Non-State Powers viewed as a threat to National Security and Western Hegemony.

Power is not exclusive, it does not discriminate against anyone although those who are in power often use it as a tool for discrimination. The elite Archon class has historically pitted small groups against each other but eventually, as through a process of elimination every so often factions will arise and separate themselves from the others . This is what we saw with Marcus Garvey and the Harlem Resonance,or MOVE, the Philadelphia-based Black liberation movement that was dedicated to a back-to-nature lifestyle. Anti-capitalist, Anarchist, Socialists, Libertarians, the Nation of Islam, Black Panthers, Occupy Wall Street, and other small unified and independent groups are seen as a threat by the the U.S. government to its monopoly on allegiance from its citizens. The problem is that many of these organizations are grass roots, meaning they were formed right here in America as opposition to the strength of the federal government. The system at large desires very much to depress and subdue it’s own population. The government fears eventually those subjugated groups will unite and finally defeat the oppressor, as was seen in the United States war for Independence.

In Federalist No. 10 James Madison wrote “The Utility of the Union as a Safeguard Against Domestic Faction and Insurrection” , addressing the question of how to guard against “factions“, or groups of citizens, with interests contrary to the rights of others or the interests of the whole community. Madison saw factions as inevitable due to the nature of man and long as men hold differing opinions, have differing amounts of wealth, and own differing amount of property, they will continue to form alliances with people who are most similar to them and they will sometimes work against the public interest, and infringe upon the rights of others. Thus, he questions how to guard against those dangers.

The suppression of minority groups, seemingly built in to the fabric of the U.S., only leads to rage.

3. ISLAM AND THE RISE OF POLITICAL JIHAD.

Radical Islam is not what you think it is. Political terrorism has been used historically by tyrants of all races as a weapon of fear, and the main reason that Islam today has been painted as the capricious religious zealot that kills without motive other then hate is the creation of a long standing geopolitical operation designed to pit humanity against itself.

Long before 9/11 there were plans calling for the “balkanization of the middle east“. The wars in the middle east were planned ahead of time, according to retired army general Wesley Clark, who in 2011 confessed to the public that just after September 11, 2001 he was informed while visiting the Pentagon that the neocon cabal that was the Bush administration planned to take out seven countries in five years, starting with Iraq, and then Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and, finishing off, with Iran. An email would later emerge showing that George W. Bush and then Prime Minister of the United Kingdom Tony Blair colluded together a full year before the war in Iraq began. Then in 2014 the award-winning investigative journalist Seymour Hersh made headlines when he showed the CIA was giving weapons and other military supplies to ISIS, in order to overthrow Muammar Gaddafi, then the president of Libya. Hersh said in a highly publicized article:

A highly classified annex to the report, not made public … pertained to the rat line. By the terms of the agreement, funding [for the rebel group now known as ISIS] came from Turkey, as well as Saudi Arabia and Qatar; the CIA, with the support of MI6, was responsible for getting arms into Syria. The annex didn’t tell the whole story of what happened in Benghazi before the attack, nor did it explain why the American consulate was attacked. ‘The consulate’s only mission was to provide cover for the moving of arms,’ the former intelligence official, who has read the annex, said. ‘It had no real political role.’

What the public at large does not know is that not only was the U.S. giving weapons to the Islamic State so called ‘moderate Rebel groups, and Mexican drug cartels, but the CIA also co-oped the formations of radical Islamic fighters back in the 1970s and was actively involved along with Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Turkey, and other gulf states in the creation and exploration of the extreme version of Wahhabi fundamentalism that is nothing but an extreme distortion of Islam. Zbigniew Brzezinski, a political scientist and geo-political strategist, who served as a counselor to President Lyndon B. Johnson from 1966–68 and was President Jimmy Carter’s National Security adviser from 1977–81, was key in the creation of the Mujahideen, which literally translates to “ones engaged in Jihad”. In English usage, it mostly refers to the Afghanistan Guerilla style fighters of the Soviet war in Afghanistan. The Mujahideen were funded and sponsored by the United States and became Al Qaeda, the group which inspired the multiple jihadist organizations that we see around the world today.

 The former director of the CIA, Robert Gates, stated in his memoirs [“From the Shadows“], that American intelligence services began to aid the Mujahadeen in Afghanistan 6 months before the Soviet intervention. In this period you were the national security adviser to President Carter. You therefore played a role in this affair. Is that correct?

Brzezinski: Yes. According to the official version of history, CIA aid to the Mujahideen began during 1980, that is to say, after the Soviet army invaded Afghanistan, 24 Dec 1979. But the reality, secretly guarded until now, is completely otherwise: Indeed, it was July 3, 1979 that President Carter signed the first directive for secret aid to the opponents of the pro-Soviet regime in Kabul. And that very day, I wrote a note to the president in which I explained to him that in my opinion this aid was going to induce a Soviet military intervention.


Operation Cyclone was the code name for the United States Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) program to arm and finance the Afghan mujahideen.


Reagan_sitting_with_people_from_the_Afghanistan-Pakistan_region_in_February_1983

4) Zionism, Mossad, and  The Israeli Shadow Government

Until recently the general public was  unaware of both the size and scope of Zionist power. Many people today confuse the radical aspects of the Zionist ideology with Judaism, however Zionism is primarily a Christian Protestant enterprise that has little to do with Judaism.“Zionists” are a group of people that believe Jews must be in control of the historical land of Israel, and are willing to use unlimited violence, theft, and subversion to achieve this goal. This is not an opinion – this is a restatement of many Zionist figureheads’ own words.

“We must use terror, assassination, intimidation, land confiscation, and the cutting of all social services to rid the Galilee of its Arab population.” ~Yisrael Koenig, The Koenig Memorandum.

The state of Israel was created by using terrorism. The Jewish insurgency in Mandatory Palestine involved paramilitary actions carried out by Jewish underground groups against the British forces and officials in Palestine between 1939 and the establishment of the State of Israel in May 1948. During this time the world saw and recognized the first acts of False Flag terrorism. Disguised as Arabs, the Irgun [a militant Zionist faction] planted a bomb in the basement of the main building of the King David hotel, whose southern wing housed the Mandate Secretariat and a few offices of the British military headquarters. The explosion caused the collapse of the western half of the southern wing of the hotel.

Enders Walter and Todd Sandler theorized in a 2006 book on the political economy of terrorism that “it provided a model for the terrorist bombings”. In another 2006 book, Gus Martin wrote that the attack is one of the best historical examples of successful terrorism, it having yielded, according to him, everything that the Irgun had wanted.

In July 2006, the Menachem Begin Heritage Center organized a conference to mark the 60th anniversary of the bombing. The conference which was attended by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former members of the Irgun unveiled a plaque commemorating the bombing was unveiled, stating “For reasons known only to the British, the hotel was not evacuated.”

There are a dizzying number of crimes and offenses by Zionists that have been ignored by Wall Street owned media. The unprovoked attack of the USS Liberty by Israel, complete US political control by AIPAC, the suspicious assassination of Yitzhak Rabin (referred to as Israel’s JFK trying to make peace with Palestine) by a proud Zionist, the Golan Heights development and other continuing land grabs, the horrific human-rights-violations towards the Palestinians, the myth of the Iron Dome defense, MOSSAD’s involvement in the 9-11 attacks, and much more. But each one is deserving of an article (if not a book) by itself. This is simply an overview. If you want to go deeper, please check out the links provided and do your own research.

According to a historian at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem: “Israel thought that it was a smart ploy to push the Islamists against the Palestinian Liberation Organization (PLO).”

In his Diaries, Vol. II. p. 711, in 1904 Theodore Herzl, the founder of Zionism, says that the area of the Jewish State stretches: “From the Brook of Egypt to the Euphrates.”

Rabbi Fischmann, member of the Jewish Agency for Palestine, declared in his testimony to the U.N. Special Committee of Enquiry on 9 July 1947: “The Promised Land extends from the River of Egypt up to the Euphrates, it includes parts of Syria and Lebanon.”

Divide and conquer: the oldest military tactic in the book.

Although many consider Zionism to be a Primarily a Jewish institution the majority of US Jews have never supported it.

Many of the clues in this summer’s attacks point a finger in the direction of the Mossad.

5. The Financial Elite’s Relentless Push For a Single World Government, often referred to as The New World Order. 

The common theme between all these secretive groups and their globalist agenda is the conspiring to eventually rule the planet, through the creation of an authoritarian world government, one which will replace and have dominion over all the earths sovereign nation-states. The NWO is related to Zionism because according to the fundamental Zionists the world government will be run from Israel by a military Messiah.

In 1797 a Scottish physicist, mathematician , and professor of philosophy named John Robison FRSE published a book entitled Proofs of a Conspiracy in which he alleges a clandestine relationship between the Illuminati and Freemasons (the work’s full title was Proofs of a Conspiracy against all the Religions and Governments of Europe, carried on in the secret meetings of Freemasons, Illuminati and Reading Societies). The secret agent monk, Alexander Horn provided much of the material for Robison’s work. French priest Abbé Barruel independently developed similar views that the Illuminati had infiltrated Continental Freemasonry, leading to the excesses of the French Revolution. In 1798, the Reverend G. W. Snyder sent Robison’s book to George Washington for his thoughts on the subject in which he replied to him in a letter saying;

“It was not my intention to doubt that, the Doctrines of the Illuminati, and principles of Jacobinism had not spread in the United States. On the contrary, no one is more truly satisfied of this fact than I am. The idea that I meant to convey, was, that I did not believe that the Lodges of Free Masons in this Country had, as Societies, endeavored to propagate the diabolical tenets of the first, or pernicious principles of the latter (if they are susceptible of separation). That Individuals of them may have done it, or that the founder, or instrument employed to found, the Democratic Societies in the United States, may have had these objects; and actually had a separation of the People from their Government in view, is too evident to be questioned.”

What the Elite Believe About the Messiah, and the History Behind It

In his book  in his ‘The Thirteenth Tribe Arthur Koestler writes about the conversion to Judaism by the Khazar Kingdom –

“…was no doubt inspired by opportunistic motives – conceived as a cunning political maneuver – it brought in its wake cultural developments which could hardly have been foreseen by those who started it.”

In the famous ‘Khazar Correspondence‘ between Hasdai bar Isaak of Spain and the Khazarian King Joseph, the following was written:

“I questioned them about it and they replied that it was true, and that the name of the kingdom is al – Khazar.”

The concluding passage, says Koestler, reads as follows:

“I feel the urge to know the truth, whether there is really a place on this earth where harassed Israel can rule itself, where it is subject to no body. If I were to know that this is indeed the case, I would not hesitate to forsake all honors, to resign my high office, to abandon my family, and travel over mountains and plains, over land and water, until I arrive at the place where my Lord, the [Jewish] King rules… And I also have one more request: to be informed whether you have any knowledge of [the possible date] of the Final Miracle [the coming of the Messiah] which, wandering from country to country, we are awaiting. Dishonored and humiliated in our dispersion, we have to listen in silence to those who say: ‘Every nation has its own land and you alone possess not even a shadow of a country on this earth.'”

Koestler then observes:

The beginning of the letter praises the happy lot of the Jews in Spain; the end breathes the bitterness of the exile, Zionist fervor and Messianic hope… these opposite attitudes have always co – existed in the divided hearts of Jews throughout their history.”

King Joseph’s reply, says Koestler, “proudly”, emphasizes that the Khazar Kingdom gives the lie that ‘the Sceptre of Judah has fallen from the Jews’ hands’ and ‘that there is no place on earth for a kingdom of their own’… Joseph then proceeds to provide a genealogy of his people. Though a fierce Jewish nationalist, proud of wielding the ‘Sceptre of Juda’, he cannot, and does not, claim for them Semitic descent; he traces their ancestry not to Shem, but to Noah’s third son Japheth; or more precisely to Japheth’s grandson, Togarma, the ancestor of all Turkish tribes.

‘We have found in the family register of our fathers’, Joseph asserts boldly, ‘that Togarma had ten sons, and the names of their offspring are as follows: Uigur, Dursu, Avars, Huns, Basilii, Tarniakh, Khazar, Zagora, Bulgars, Sabir. We are the sons of Khazar, the seventh…’ …the characteristic feature in this genealogical exercise is the amalgamation of Genesis with Turkish tribal tradition… It also throws a sidelight on the frequent description of the Khazars as the people of Magog. 

According to Thomas Romer, a professor of Old Testament at the University of Lausanne, the U.S. “uses the Bible as an excuse for invading other countries.” He said that it was true of President George W. Bush in his deciding that the U.S. attack Iraq. For it appears that President Bush’s decision to go to war against Iraqi President Saddam Hussein was at least partly inspired by religious Zionism, by means of what Bush believed was contained in the book of Ezekiel. “Even for me, as a student who specializes in understanding Bible prophecy, this is a rather frightening scenario. I think George W. Bush’s understanding of Ezekiel 38-39, which I also believed for several years, contributed to him thinking he had been chosen by God in winning the close election for president against Al Gore in order to make an impact for God in the Middle East. Spreading democracy is one thing; but attacking a nation due to one’s understanding of Bible prophecy is quite another” writes Romer.

Gog and Magog are at work in the Middle East, The biblical prophecies are being fulfilled. This confrontation is willed by God who wants this conflict to erase his people’s enemies before a new age begins.” said Bush, the 43rd President of the United States. Former French president Jacques Chirac claimed in late 2009 that Bush made these statements to him at some point prior the invasion of Iraq in March 2003 while “appealing to him as a Christian” and attempting to convince him to have France join the invasion. The Independent, 2 January 2010

freemason-albert-pike-quote

What does Ezekiel 38-39 say?  It says Gog will be allied with Persia [now Iran], Ethiopia, Put [now Libya], (v. 5) in invading the nation of Israel with many armies to wipe it off the map (v. 8), but that God will intervene and send a  to save Israel . Obviously, this text has not been fulfilled and thus, for Christian Zionist it must still happen in the future.

The 40th U.S. President Ronald Reagan also made a speech as governor of California in which he identified Gog in Ezekiel 38-39 as the Soviet Union or Russia.

In his speech, Toward a New World Order, delivered on September 11, 1990 during a joint session of the US Congress, President George H. W. Bush described his objectives for post-Cold War global governance in cooperation with post-Soviet states. He stated:

Until now, the world we’ve known has been a world divided—a world of barbed wire and concrete block, conflict and cold war. Now, we can see a new world coming into view. A world in which there is the very real prospect of a new world order. In the words of Winston Churchill, a “world order” in which “the principles of justice and fair play … protect the weak against the strong …” A world where the United Nations, freed from cold war stalemate, is poised to fulfill the historic vision of its founders. A world in which freedom and respect for human rights find a home among all nations.

The New York Times observed that progressives were denouncing this new world order as a rationalization of American imperial ambitions in the Middle East, while conservatives rejected any new security arrangements altogether and fulminated about any possibility of a UN revival. However, Chip Berlet, an American investigative reporter specializing in the study of right-wing movements in the US, writes:

When President Bush announced his new foreign policy would help build a New World Order, his phrasing surged through the Christian and secular hard right like an electric shock, since the phrase had been used to represent the dreaded collectivist One World Government for decades. Some Christians saw Bush as signaling the End Times betrayal by a world leader. Secular anticommunists saw a bold attempt to smash US sovereignty and impose a tyrannical collectivist system run by the United Nations.

American televangelist Pat Robertson, with his 1991 best-selling book The New World Order, became the most prominent Christian popularized of conspiracy theories about recent American history. He describes a scenario where Wall Street, the Federal Reserve System, the Council on Foreign Relations, the Bilderberg Group, the Trilateral Commission and the mass media industry control the flow of events from behind the scenes, nudging people constantly and covertly in the direction of single world government for the Antichrist.
George Soros appears to be the primary globalist funding the movement of humanity toward war and a global government. Soros has pushed the U.S. to war on the middle east, he pushed for the middle eastern refugees to resettle in Europe amongst people the U.S. has conditioned them to hate, and has funded racial division in the U.S. for the U.S. to war on itself. The summer of chaos is in full swing, and Soros predicted it, because he paid for it.
Don’t be fooled into hating people because of the twisted world view of a Nazi collaborator like George Soros and the rest of these Bilderberg Group psychopaths.

RELATED ARTICLES 

Exposing Zionism and Israel: A Definitive Guide

Zionism and racism converge in deleted Times of Israel post on Ferguson

George Soros predicts riots, police state and civil war for America

Follow WE ARE CHANGE on SOCIAL MEDIA


Sign up become a patron and Show your support for alternative news

for Just 1$ a month you can help Grow We are change
patreon
We use Bitcoin Too !  
12HdLgeeuA87t2JU8m4tbRo247Yj5u2TVP
Wearechange.org/donate

Visit The Gear Store Wearechange.org/gear


Danny F. Quest is an official 9/11 Truther, anti-war activist, humanitarian,  Blogger, and writer/contributer  for WeareChange.org  Follow him on Social Media.


This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License

©WEareCHANGE.org (2016)

avatar
Danny F. Quest, is an artist, blogger, journalist, and media personality. Co. Founder of TheTruther.us and author of “120 characters or less’ the guide to winning a debate in the digital age”. Danny now works as a Freelance journalist and graphic designer for WeAreChange.org. Danny’s next big project is “30 days in Gaza” a documentary bringing light to the current conditions of the Palestinian people living under Israeli occupation.

Obama JOKES during statement on Munich Terror Event

Grinning Obama JOKES during statement on Munich carnage as he shifts gears to say he’ll miss daughter Malia when she leaves the nest for collegefreudian slip

  • He noted how terrorism undermines people’s freedoms and lifestyles in the absence of good law enforcement
  • Then Obama wisecracked about daughter Malia leaving the nest for college, drawing laughter from the entire room
  • Unfazed, he shifted gears back to the somber subject matter
  • Obama had held a joint press conference with Mexico’s president, one hour before the Munich carnage began, criticizing Donald Trump for exaggerating terrorism threats

As news reports of a gun massacre in Munich crossed the Atlantic Ocean on Friday, the President of the United States was cracking jokes.

“Getting a little too personal there,” he said.

Obama then returned to the gravity he had discarded just moments before.

‘That depends on law enforcement,’ he said. ‘It depends on the men and woman in uniform every single day, who are under some of the most adverse circumstances imaginable at times, making sure to keep us safe.’

IMF: Deutsche Bank World’s Most Dangerous Bank Shares HALVED

Follow WE ARE CHANGE on SOCIAL MEDIA


Sign up become a patron and Show your support for alternative news

for Just 1$ a month you can help Grow We are change
patreon
We use Bitcoin Too !  
12HdLgeeuA87t2JU8m4tbRo247Yj5u2TVP
Wearechange.org/donate

Visit The Gear Store Wearechange.org/gear


Danny F. Quest is an official 9/11 Truther, anti-war activist, humanitarian,  Blogger, and writer/contributer  for WeareChange.org  Follow him on Social Media.


This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License

©WEareCHANGE.org (2016)

 

 

avatar
Danny F. Quest, is an artist, blogger, journalist, and media personality. Co. Founder of TheTruther.us and author of “120 characters or less’ the guide to winning a debate in the digital age”. Danny now works as a Freelance journalist and graphic designer for WeAreChange.org. Danny’s next big project is “30 days in Gaza” a documentary bringing light to the current conditions of the Palestinian people living under Israeli occupation.

Is the Dallas Shooting the First Spark of a Potential Powder Keg?

The United States are dilacerated by interracial and deep social conflicts which could undermine American stability. The ongoing situation can be compared to the low-intensity civil war and the society could easily burst into flames at the slightest spark.

Hundreds of demonstrators have been arrested across the U.S. as protests against police shootings intensified and new details about the motivations and plans of the Dallas sniper emerged. In Baton Rouge, Louisiana, more than 160 people were detained during demonstrations over the shooting death of Alton Sterling, a 37-year-old African American.

12

Military-style vehicles, teargas and smoke grenades returned to American streets this summer, and Barack Obama appealed for calm and said those who attack law enforcement undermine the cause of social justice. The unrest built as authorities in Dallas, TX, said black gunmen had killed at least five white policemen in Dallas in the first inevitable result of years of anti-white incitement by the media and establishment. Gunfire broke out at around 20:45 local time last Thursday, as Black Lives Matter demonstrators marched through the city.

The so-called Black Power Political Organization claimed on its Facebook account that it was behind the attack in which cops were picked out from an ‘elevated position’. According to the BPPO statements ‘more assassinations are coming’. There were initial reports there could have been up to three or four snipers involved in a coordinated attack during a peaceful Black Lives Matter protest.

11

Victim of the System

The Dallas attack was highly organized. At least one of the suspects was a well trained U.S. military veteran who had gathered a large amount of weaponry. The gunman, Micah Xavier Johnson, served with the U.S. Army Reserve for six years and was in Afghanistan. He had far-reaching plans for the outbreak of a small guerrilla war against white policemen. Dallas Police Chief David Brown said Johnson told negotiators before he died he was upset over recent police-involved shootings of African Americans and ‘wanted to kill white people, especially white officers’. He was heavily-armed and killed by police – while holed up in the car park – in a robot-controlled explosive device after negotiations broke down.

3

Today an uncountable number of American veterans are trying to fit into civilian life after not getting a promotion and retirement. Hundreds of thousands of American citizens were taught to fight and kill by the US government, now many of them are living in poverty and hoarding anger at the unjust American society. These people represent a real army of potential murderers. Nevertheless, this is not their fault – the government does not take care of the veterans who gave their lives for the country and politicians are not ready to discuss this issue, they have no intention of even facing it.

The current political and economic systems are in crisis and are not addressing social and racial problems. Without a nationwide reform of police hiring and training practices,  a social explosion that would rival Ferguson’s riots in 2014 could erupt at any moment. Shootings in Baton Rouge and Kansas City of police officers demonstrate that growing hatred of police.

44

Racial Roots

The existing racism, of course, is a result of authorities’ inaction – which may be intentional. The Republican Party under George W. Bush loved to trumpet being “tough on crime” — but never addressed the crimes of police officers.

Racism is another powerful political trump card which is used by different political forces, including the Democratic Party. Moreover, the racism issue is a part of a horse trade and plays a big role in the run-up to presidential elections. Therefore, the Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton will almost certainly get many votes thanks to her statements about the necessity of equality and fight against racism – despite her failure to actually offer a solution to the issue.

5

The ruling Democratic Party just concluded a deal with black communities – politicians give benefits and autonomy amounting to local fiefdoms to the community leaders, who herd them votes in exchange. As a result, African Americans have been urged to vote for the Democrats, especially the Clintons. Bill and Hillary have very close ties with black leaders, so there is no surprise that Hillary Clinton has condemned the Dallas Police Department.

Both the Republicans and the Democrats have failed to solve the police brutality crisis, and have escalated the situation with weapons from the federal government. Unless a change is made, the police brutality will continue, and fuel the growing race divide. 

Executive Order: United Nations allowed to use Force on US Citizens

un helmet shot United Nation military troops may soon arrive and see action on American soil following the United States’ announcement of support for “a set of principles that give a green light for U.N. peacekeeping troops and police to use force to protect civilians in armed conflicts,” Military Times reports.

The militarization of local police, combined with the arrival of a United Nations military presence, could mean big trouble for liberty and freedom here in America.

U.S. Ambassador Samantha Power told attendees at an important U.N. meeting that the United States was “proud” and “humbled” to be a included in the new agenda and promised to follow by the 18 pledges. Fox News 

The arrival of the United Nations requires federalization of police in order to set a global standard of law enforcement. President Barack Obama has pounced on the opportunity to exploit recent shootings to push for the federalization of local police forces.

Videos have been flooding the internet documenting United Nations military-like vehicles moving across America.

And this would not the be the first time American politicians have attempted to sell their citizens out to the powers of the United Nations. The UN’s first attempt to capture America was in 1951. In strange fashion, forces flying the flag of the United Nations began to occupy small towns and cities across the United States. This was intended to test the will of the people and see if they would accept a UN “takeover.” The test failed and sparked controversy and concerns over a “revolution-in-the-making” that would destroy any plot formulated by the Council on Foreign Relations and the United Nations.

UN forces were quickly met with much resistance and silently left occupied government buildings and removed United Nation flags nationwide. Broadcaster Myron C. Fagan documented the secretive operation in the 1960’s claiming “the UN ‘invasions’ were intended to be completely hush-hush. The Mass Media were very accommodating and the local newspapers and radio stations in the ‘invaded’ cities were kept silent under order of the UN. However, in several of the cities the local police refused to be ‘captured’. That caused quite an uproar — true, only locally, but it threatened to spread nationwide, especially after troops and officers assigned to additional ‘invasion units’ refused to ‘serve’. The alarmed plotters hastily halted all further ‘invasions’.”

YourNewsWire reports:

President Obama has signed an executive order that allows for the US military to use force against American citizens for the first time in history.

 The order was signed on July 1st, 2016 and is titled “Executive Order — United States Policy on Pre- and Post-Strike Measures to Address Civilian Casualties in U.S. Operations Involving the Use of Force“.

The order appears to have changed the rules of engagement between the military and ordinary U.S. citizens in an end-around the Constitution.

Whitehouse.gov reports:

EXECUTIVE ORDER

 UNITED STATES POLICY ON PRE- AND POST-STRIKE MEASURES TO ADDRESS CIVILIAN CASUALTIES IN U.S. OPERATIONS INVOLVING THE USE OF FORCE

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, I hereby direct as follows:

Section 1. Purpose. United States policy on civilian casualties resulting from U.S. operations involving the use of force in armed conflict or in the exercise of the Nation’s inherent right of self-defense is based on our national interests, our values, and our legal obligations. As a Nation, we are steadfastly committed to complying with our obligations under the law of armed conflict, including those that address the protection of civilians, such as the fundamental principles of necessity, humanity, distinction, and proportionality.

The protection of civilians is fundamentally consistent with the effective, efficient, and decisive use of force in pursuit of U.S. national interests. Minimizing civilian casualties can further mission objectives; help maintain the support of partner governments and vulnerable populations, especially in the conduct of counterterrorism and counterinsurgency operations; and enhance the legitimacy and sustainability of U.S. operations critical to our national security. As a matter of policy, the United States therefore routinely imposes certain heightened policy standards that are more protective than the requirements of the law of armed conflict that relate to the protection of civilians.

Civilian casualties are a tragic and at times unavoidable consequence of the use of force in situations of armed conflict or in the exercise of a state’s inherent right of self-defense. The U.S. Government shall maintain and promote best practices that reduce the likelihood of civilian casualties, take appropriate steps when such casualties occur, and draw lessons from our operations to further enhance the protection of civilians.

Sec. 2. Policy. In furtherance of U.S. Government efforts to protect civilians in U.S. operations involving the use of force in armed conflict or in the exercise of the Nation’s inherent right of self-defense, and with a view toward enhancing such efforts, relevant departments and agencies (agencies) shall continue to take certain measures in present and future operations.

(a) In particular, relevant agencies shall, consistent with mission objectives and applicable law, including the law of armed conflict:

(i) train personnel, commensurate with their responsibilities, on compliance with legal obligations and policy guidance that address the protection of civilians and on implementation of best practices that reduce the likelihood of civilian casualties, including through exercises, pre-deployment training, and simulations of complex operational environments that include civilians;

(ii) develop, acquire, and field intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance systems that, by enabling more accurate battlespace awareness, contribute to the protection of civilians;

(iii) develop, acquire, and field weapon systems and other technological capabilities that further enable the discriminate use of force in different operational contexts;

(iv) take feasible precautions in conducting attacks to reduce the likelihood of civilian casualties, such as providing warnings to the civilian population (unless the circumstances do not permit), adjusting the timing of attacks, taking steps to ensure military objectives and civilians are clearly distinguished, and taking other measures appropriate to the circumstances; and

(v) conduct assessments that assist in the reduction of civilian casualties by identifying risks to civilians and evaluating efforts to reduce risks to civilians.

(b) In addition to the responsibilities above, relevant agencies shall also, as appropriate and consistent with mission objectives and applicable law, including the law of armed conflict:

(i) review or investigate incidents involving civilian casualties, including by considering relevant and credible information from all available sources, such as other agencies, partner governments, and nongovernmental organizations, and take measures to mitigate the likelihood of future incidents of civilian casualties;

(ii) acknowledge U.S. Government responsibility for civilian casualties and offer condolences, including ex gratia payments, to civilians who are injured or to the families of civilians who are killed;

(iii) engage with foreign partners to share and learn best practices for reducing the likelihood of and responding to civilian casualties, including through appropriate training and assistance; and

(iv) maintain channels for engagement with the International Committee of the Red Cross and other nongovernmental organizations that operate in conflict zones and encourage such organizations to assist in efforts to distinguish between military objectives and civilians, including by appropriately marking protected facilities, vehicles, and personnel, and by providing updated information on the locations of such facilities and personnel.

Sec. 3. Report on Strikes Undertaken by the U.S. Government Against Terrorist Targets Outside Areas of Active Hostilities. (a) The Director of National Intelligence (DNI), or such other official as the President may designate, shall obtain from relevant agencies information about the number of strikes undertaken by the U.S. Government against terrorist targets outside areas of active hostilities from January 1, 2016, through December 31, 2016, as well as assessments of combatant and non-combatant deaths resulting from those strikes, and publicly release an unclassified summary of such information no later than May 1, 2017. By May 1 of each subsequent year, as consistent with the need to protect sources and methods, the DNI shall publicly release a report with the same information for the preceding calendar year.

(b) The annual report shall also include information obtained from relevant agencies regarding the general sources of information and methodology used to conduct these assessments and, as feasible and appropriate, shall address the general reasons for discrepancies between post-strike assessments from the U.S. Government and credible reporting from nongovernmental organizations regarding non-combatant deaths resulting from strikes undertaken by the U.S. Government against terrorist targets outside areas of active hostilities.

(c) In preparing a report under this section, the DNI shall review relevant and credible post-strike all-source reporting, including such information from nongovernmental sources, for the purpose of ensuring that this reporting is available to and considered by relevant agencies in their assessment of deaths.

(d) The Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs may, as appropriate, request that the head of any relevant agency conduct additional reviews related to the intelligence assessments of deaths from strikes against terrorist targets outside areas of active hostilities.

Sec. 4. Periodic Consultation. In furtherance of the policies and practices set forth in this order, the Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs, through the National Security Council staff, will convene agencies with relevant defense, counterterrorism, intelligence, legal, civilian protection, and technology expertise to consult on civilian casualty trends, consider potential improvements to U.S. Government civilian casualty mitigation efforts, and, as appropriate, report to the Deputies and Principals Committees, consistent with Presidential Policy Directive 1 or its successor. Specific incidents will not be considered in this context, and will continue to be examined within relevant chains of command.

Sec. 5. General Provisions. (a) The policies and practices set forth above are not intended to alter, and shall be implemented consistent with, the authority and responsibility of commanders and other U.S. personnel to execute their mission as directed by the President or other appropriate authorities, which necessarily includes the inherent right of self-defense and the maintenance of good order and discipline among U.S. personnel. No part of this order modifies the chain of command of the U.S. Armed Forces or the authority of U.S. commanders.

(b) No part of this order modifies priorities in the collection of intelligence or the development, acquisition, or fielding of weapon systems and other technological capabilities.

(c) No part of this order shall prejudice or supplant established procedures pertaining to administrative or criminal investigative or judicial processes in the context of the military justice system or other applicable law and regulation.

(d) The policies set forth in this order are consistent with existing U.S. obligations under international law and are not intended to create new international legal obligations; nor shall anything in this order be construed to derogate from obligations under applicable law, including the law of armed conflict.

(e) This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.

BARACK OBAMA

THE WHITE HOUSE,
July 1, 2016.

Sources: http://americanintelligencereport.com/u-s-approves-united-nations-use-of-military-force-on-american-soil

https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2016/07/01/executive-order-united-states-policy-pre-and-post-strike-measures

 Follow us on our other Social media accounts 


Sign up become a patron and Show your support for alternative news

for Just 1$ a month you can help Grow We are change
patreon
We use Bitcoin Too !  
12HdLgeeuA87t2JU8m4tbRo247Yj5u2TVP
Wearechange.org/donate

Visit The Gear Store Wearechange.org/gear


Danny F. Quest is an official 9/11 Truther, anti-war activist, humanitarian,  Blogger, and writer/contributer  for WeareChange.org  Follow him on Social Media.


©WEareCHANGE.org (2016)

 

avatar
Danny F. Quest, is an artist, blogger, journalist, and media personality. Co. Founder of TheTruther.us and author of “120 characters or less’ the guide to winning a debate in the digital age”. Danny now works as a Freelance journalist and graphic designer for WeAreChange.org. Danny’s next big project is “30 days in Gaza” a documentary bringing light to the current conditions of the Palestinian people living under Israeli occupation.

Why Does It Look Like The U.S. Is Rescuing ISIS?

Ron Paul Claims Obama Might Be ‘Saving ISIS’ And He Is Right

Picture

The Obama Administration Recently Announced Intent To Focus On Dethroning The President Of Syria.

Assad’s regime is the largest force fighting against ISIS on the ground in Syria.

By Ron Paul

The ongoing war in Syria may see some escalation soon. A report that 51 State Dept. employees (out of 13,000 foreign service officers) signed a memo urging President Obama to change his focus in Syria from fighting ISIS to fighting the secular Assad government has caused quite a stir.

The fact that such a small number of individuals could make this a noteworthy story shows that propaganda continues to reign supreme. It makes no sense that U.S. can weaken ISIS by attacking the main opponent of ISIS (i.e., Assad).

We’re constantly smothered in rhetoric about how America “must stop ISIS.” Yet, ISIS has been on the ropes, and in trouble. The group has been on the run, and what does the U.S. want to do? They want to hurry up and bomb Assad, which they’ve been trying to do for five years now.

There’s agitation in the Congress right now to give the authority to Obama to do something that he ‘seems’ to be reluctant to do. If we would have had an aggressive neocon as a president, Congress wouldn’t have mattered. He would have went ahead with the bombings by now.

I think we’re really playing with fire here. Is it really worth the risk to stir up a war with Russia? It makes no difference to Americans whether or not Assad remain in power in Syria. It has nothing to do with our freedoms or economy. Yet the rhetoric keeps building nonetheless.

An American in Orlando lost his mind and shot 50 people dead, and the response is to go across the world and attack Assad in Syria? Such illogic reminds me of the U.S. attacking Iraq after 9/11. It made no sense then (or now) and it accomplished nothing but the creation of chaos (and ironically) ISIS itself!

Are we witnessing opportunism once again?

If we want to be safer and enjoy more liberties, we much change our foreign policy. We have to mind our own business, have a strong national defense, and practice non-intervention abroad with other nations. That idea is much better than the nonsense coming from the State Department and the government at large.

SOURCE: RONPAUL


Police Don’t Need To Know The Laws They Enforce

avatar
Danny F. Quest, is an artist, blogger, journalist, and media personality. Co. Founder of TheTruther.us and author of “120 characters or less’ the guide to winning a debate in the digital age”. Danny now works as a Freelance journalist and graphic designer for WeAreChange.org. Danny’s next big project is “30 days in Gaza” a documentary bringing light to the current conditions of the Palestinian people living under Israeli occupation.

Pin It on Pinterest