In this video Luke Rudkowski covers the latest election news with the newest batch of Wikileaks John Podesta email release. We go over one of the most damning emails in this video and put in question her campaign slogan “I’m with her.” For more info invest in us onhttps://www.patreon.com/wearechange
Danny F. Quest, is an artist, blogger, journalist, and media personality. Co. Founder of TheTruther.us, Danny works as a Freelance journalist and graphic designer for WeAreChange.org, is currently working on publishing the WeAreChange memoir with Brian Kenny, If you would like to contribute to getting our book out click this link https://igg.me/at/Wearechangebook
In an email discussion about the Dairy lobby’s plan to put Nutrasweet in school kids milk sent to John Podesta the sender, Don Kennedy asserts that Aspartame is a poison and that in 1985, Monsanto purchased G.D. Searle, the chemical company that held the patent to aspartame, the active ingredient in NutraSweet. Don Kennedy adds that “Monsanto was apparently untroubled by aspartame’s clouded past, including a 1980 FDA Board of Inquiry, comprised of three independent scientists, which confirmed that it “might induce brain tumors”.
He goes on to say “the FDA had actually banned aspartame based on this finding, only to have Searle Chairman Donald Rumsfeld (currently the Secretary of Defense) vow to ‘call in his markers’ to get it approved.” Kennedy goes on to say how the chemical passed when Reagan’s FDA commissioner, Arthur Hayes Hull, Jr added an additional member to the commission and then the vote became deadlocked and he broke the tie of 3-3 by ruling in aspartame’s favor.
On January 21, 1981, the day after Ronald Reagan’s inauguration, Searle re-applied to the FDA for approval to use aspartame in food sweetener, and Reagan’s new FDA commissioner, Arthur Hayes Hull, Jr., appointed a 5-person Scientific Commission to review the board of inquiry’s decision. It soon became clear that the panel would uphold the ban by a 3-2 decision, but Hull then installed a sixth member on the commission, and the vote became deadlocked. He then personally broke the tie in aspartame’s favor. Hull later left the FDA under allegations of impropriety, served briefly as Provost at New York Medical College, and then took a position with Burston-Marsteller, the chief public relations firm for both Monsanto and GD Searle. Since that time he has never spoken publicly about aspartame.
The recipient, a Wendy Abrams, responded back to Kennedy by giving an example of her own experience with the poisonous chemical aspartame. She said that she drank so much of it in college, she developed exercise-induced asthma and severe headaches as a result, adding that both went away when she got off of it. Aspartame has long been speculated to be a harmful chemical that is added into food as a sweetener which causes a number of numerous health problems.
I don’t know how much you know about Nutrasweet, but I think it is poison. I drank so much of it in college, I developed exercise-induced asthma and severe headaches as a result (both went away when i got off of it, but if I drink even one ounce, I will have a horrible headache immediately.) Doctors will swear to me it is fine, and I will tell them, maybe i’m the only person in the world who reacts like this, but clearly it affects me, and then they’ll tell me again, it is fine. They are so brainwashed by the propaganda, they refuse to believe anything contrary. I also have a friend who worked for the researchers at University of Chicago (which has a top rated neurology dept) and the doctors there said when they gave nutrasweet to lab mice, it literally blew holes in their brains.
Earlier today, we reported on the potential of a DNS DDoS cannon being used to commmit large scale DNS Distributed Denial Of Service (DDos) attacks against major internet trafficker DYN.
This journalist has reported on We Are Change about having a private conversation with someone a few months back that claimed they were working on what they called “the world’s largest DNS DDoS cannon.” Now DYN is reporting that they are now experiencing a third wave of attacks against their DNS servers.
Today’s internet blackout is potentially that individual hacker’s display of power. An unlikely alternative is that the United Nations has taken over the internet and will be disabling certain websites that you love because the UN hates fun. The U.S. Department of Homeland Security is reportedly investigating this incident now.
DYN hosts several popular sites DNS so what is happening is essentially computers are failing to look up the website due to connection problems not on the user end but on DYN’s end.
What’s the problem? The problem is that DNS is what is used for your computer to communicate with a website if your DNS look up fails then you will be given a connection error page.
DNS is just a fancy way to say phone-book for an Ip Address, without a connection to DNS an IP address fails to call the IP address that you dial it to. Essentially its an attack in the middle of your computer and the web server itself as it’s not attacking a host server it’s attacking the DNS on the server that hosts the DNS resolve address that deciphers computer IP addresses back to your display as a domain name like www.wearechange.org.
We will continue to keep you updated on this throughout the day as hackers seem to be targeting DYN DNS servers preventing you from connecting to big websites that require DYN’s DNS server to function. As you can see in the pictures below from Level 3 Communications in the early morning around 6 a.m. the east coast was a target. During the afternoon the west coast became a target. This is a very sophisticated attack stay tuned.
“Our engineers continue to investigate and mitigate several attacks aimed against the Dyn Managed DNS infrastructure.
Posted 24 minutes ago. Oct 21, 2016 – 20:37 UTC
Our engineers are continuing to investigate and mitigate several attacks aimed against the Dyn Managed DNS infrastructure.
Posted 3 minutes ago. Oct 21, 2016 – 20:59 UTC
At this time, the advanced service monitoring issue has been resolved. Our engineers are still investigating and mitigating the attacks on our infrastructure.
Posted about 2 hours ago. Oct 21, 2016 – 18:52 UTC
Dyn Managed DNS advanced service monitoring is currently experiencing issues. Customers may notice incorrect probe alerts on their advanced DNS services. Our engineers continue to monitor and investigate the issue.”
Yesterday, in addition to releasing a batch of emails containing Obama’s secret email address alias (firstname.lastname@example.org), Wikileaks also tweeted out a threat to Donna Brazile and Hillary Clinton’s vice presidential choice Tim Kaine saying, “We have a surprise for Tim Kaine and Donna Brazile.”
Wikileaks has been leaking troves and troves of Hillary Clinton campaign chair John Podesta’s emails for the last 2 weeks. Now up to nearly 24,000 emails since it’s release today of the 14th installment of John Podesta’s email dump, Wikileaks has made a promise that it has a surprise for Tim Kaine and Donna Brazile. This tweet followed with the RT (retweet) of an NBC reporter Kailani Koenig who said, “Tim Kaine’s been saying hacked Wikileaks emails might not be accurate, so asked him whether he had any examples or had heard if one wasn’t real,” to which he responded, “I read of one example yesterday but I can’t pin down which one it was.”
Prior to tweeting its threat to Kaine and Brazile, the Wikileaks twitter account mocked Hillary’s statement that “17 agencies have confirmed Russia hacked the U.S.”
Tweeting that Clinton’s “17 US intelligence agencies” include: Coast Guard, DEA, Navel Intelligence, Department of Energy, Air Force recon, and then added that “Clinton’s ’17 US intelligence agencies’ may be the biggest, most immediately disprovable wopper ever intentionally made during a debate.”
Hillary Clinton's "17 US intelligence agencies" include:
*Coast Guard *DEA *Navel Intelligence *Department of Energy *Air Force recon
What could the anti-secrecy whistle-blower organization have on Tim Kaine, Donna Brazile, and John Kerry? At this rate of 2,000-some emails a day we won’t have to wait long to find out what Wikileaks and it’s founder Julian Assange knows.
The battle is heating up between Assange and the U.S. government who was alleged to have had a hand in cutting Assange’s internet access at the Ecuadorian embassy recently, a claim that a U.S. spokesman has strongly denied. Wikileaks first became a thorn in the U.S. side when they released U.S. diplomatic cables in 2010. Showing the corrupt U.S. policies and has now exposed the U.S. election fraud and questionable tactics by the Democrats and Hillary Clinton’s campaign team.
“While our concerns about Wikileaks are longstanding any suggestion that Secretary Kerry or the State Department were involved in shutting down Wikileaks is false.” Also adding that the “reports that Secretary Of State John Kerry had a meeting with Ecuadorian Officials about shutting down Assange’s internet were also false,” State Dept. spokesperson John Kirby, said.
Already revelations are starting to flow into twitter further exposing how corrupt not only Hillary Clinton is, but the entire Democrat party and Hillary’s campaign staff themselves.
It has been revealed that Hillary Clinton vetted billionaires and businessmen who donated to the Clinton Foundation as potential running mates. Her VP choices included –
General Motors CEO and chairwoman Mary Barra, former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg, Apple CEO Tim Cook, Microsoft founder Bill Gates, Coca-Cola CEO Muhtar Kent, Rockefeller Foundation president Judith Rodin and Starbucks CEO Howard Schultz.
In an interview with Breitbart News Juanita Broaddrick broke down telling her full story in vivid detail of how Bill Clinton had raped her years ago in her hotel room in Arkansas 1978, and subsequently how she believes that Hillary knew that Bill had raped her based off Hillary’s behavior afterward and that Hillary helped cover it up and threatened her.
Juanita Broaddrick started off describing the moment that she and the Clintons arrived at a private Clinton fundraiser Juanita was invited to in 1978.
Broaddrick was a volunteer for the Clinton’s campaign. Juanita was to deliver checks from donors to the Clinton campaign that day but arrived earlier specifically to avoid the Clintons, instead she met Hillary face to face. After learning from the Clinton’s driver that she was the talk of the entire ride over to the event.
“I just want to thank you for everything you are doing for Bill’s campaign and its so nice to meet you.” Hillary said.
Juanita responded with a nod and told her friend, “Let’s go”, feeling uncomfortable that the Clintons had talked about her. That’s when something happened that Juanita will never forget. Juanita Broaddrick detailed the moment that Hillary grabbed hold of her arm stared her in the face with an angry look and said to her a frightening statement in a low voice, “Do you understand? Everything that you do?”
That statement is why Juanita Broaddrick feels that Hillary Clinton potentially knew that her husband Bill Clinton had raped her. Comforted by Kathleen Willey, another alleged Clinton rape victim, Juanita Broaddrick trembled, crying, saying, “She is still afraid of Bill Clinton and asserted that she is frightened by the idea that Hillary Clinton could be President of the United States.”
“And they come in early from the kitchen area. And just before they do, a gentleman who had driven them from the airport comes straight over to me. He was supporting Clinton but he didn’t know what had happened to me even though he was a friend. And he said the topic of the conversation all the way from the airport was about you.
“And that startled me. And I knew I had to get out of there. Well, just as he moved, here comes Hillary straight for me. And she gets to me and she starts saying, ‘I just want to thank you for everything you are doing for Bill’s campaign. And it’s so nice to meet you.’ And all of these things.
“So I just nodded and I told my friend, ‘Let’s go.’ And I thought somebody from behind had grabbed a hold of my arm. But it was her. She grabbed a hold of my arm and my hand and she pulls me into her. And she says with this very angry look on her face, which had been so pleasant seconds before. And in a low voice, says, ‘Do you understand? Everything that you do.’ And that frightened me.”