The post WHOA: The Secret Service Shot Down A Drone Over Trump’s Head! appeared first on We Are Change.

The post THE END OF AN ERA! appeared first on We Are Change.

The post This Revelation Just Shocked Joe Rogan appeared first on We Are Change.

The post RFK Jr. Facing SINISTER Opposition As Microplastics In HUMAN BRAINS Soaring?! appeared first on We Are Change.

The post DRONE WAR: Massive AI Military Super Tech Arms Race! Is This Thucydides’ Trap? appeared first on We Are Change.

The post New Jersey Drones Back! Shapeshifting Orbs And Super-Speed Underwater Beings? appeared first on We Are Change.

The post Woke Sentient AI Controlling DRONE SWARMS?! Trump Demands Disclosure appeared first on We Are Change.

The post BOMBSHELL: Whistleblower OFFED?! AI Taking Over As Tech Oligarchs Swarm Trump appeared first on We Are Change.

The post Alien Entities Are Controlling The Drones! Interdimensional War Coming?? appeared first on We Are Change.

And check out Vizsla Silver Corp (US: VZLA) – https://vizslasilvercorp.com/

Vizsla Silver investor info – https://vizslasilvercorp.com/investors/media/

The post Major Disclosures Just Days Away! UFOs Tied To Drones And Las Vegas PSYOPs?? appeared first on We Are Change.

The post Huge BEHIND-THE-SCENES Deals! Trump And Musk Secretly Plotting World Peace appeared first on We Are Change.

I’m seeing more YouTube channels being demonetized, terminated, and blacklisted so if you can please sign up on our email list. That way we have another way to contact you as I patiently wait for the inevitable next attack on our YouTube channel by the Google Alphabet CIA monopoly corporatocracy.

We’re going to give you the news that’s important and the news that matters. You probably won’t hear anywhere else because we’re living in a day and age of mass misinformation and propaganda. In today’s video we’re going to talk about war mongers bankrupting this country, more saber-rattling by Israel and Saudi Arabia, plus some important psychological lessons to learn from the latest U.S. Senator Ted Cruz.

Video is also available on DTUBE

There is a bigger battle for the future of all wars right now at the US Senate plus a lot more.

As we are shooting this video, US Senator Ted Cruz is trending worldwide on Twitter. Moments after he liked a pornographic video. He seemingly did not realize that likes are public. Everyone is now going crazy.

The official Pornhub Twitter account has even offered Ted Cruz a premium membership to their services. Personally, this issue does not affect my life or anyone else in the general public. I see it as a distraction, but there are some important lessons we could learn here. Number one, no one is perfect, we all make mistakes, including a US Senator representative of the United States. He is a conservative and preaches traditional values who boasts on his public Twitter account that he’s a father of two and who his wife is.

However, he publicly liked a pornographic video on his Twitter account on 9/11. The second lesson is what you resist persists, and for me, it shouldn’t be a big deal that he liked the pornographic video. However, people do see it as a big deal because this is the same Ted Cruz that defended a ban on dildos and other sex toys in Texas with his legal team arguing that there was “no right to stimulate one’s genitals.”

If you study psychology, you understand that what people hate the most in others is usually the shadow within themselves. As demonstrated wonderfully in a hypocritical political system with incidents like this one.

Also with former Republican Senator Larry Craig who helped enact the military “Don’t Ask Don’t Tell” policy. He was also known as an anti-gay marriage campaigner. He was caught soliciting sex from what an undercover male police officer in a public bathroom.

Often if someone hates you because of the way you choose to live your life, or your sex, or your race, or for your personal preferences or choices, there is a reason. I think it’s important for a lot of people to understand that the person is throwing hate against you usually is doing it because of deep psychological rooted problems.

That’s why an example for most people who are homophobic usually have homosexual feelings.  People repress things and hold them in, build on it and make it bigger than it is. That’s why I think the world would be a better place if we all would just stop judging people on what they do when it does not affect us. Understand where it’s coming from so we don’t react negatively to put an end to the cycle of hate and fear.

That’s why I am, linking to an article by a licensed therapist. I recommend you check it out. It would be nice if people could stop projecting your fear and anger onto others. That, of course, begins with not giving such a hard time to Ted Cruz who just for the official record right now is blaming his staff member for this incident

In U.S. Senate news we have Senator Rand Paul introducing a bill to give money to hurricane victims in the United States instead of foreign dictators via foreign aid. This bill has been completely blocked by the Senate. He has brought up a very important point including examples of what we spend on foreign aid.

We spent a hundred billion dollars building roads in Afghanistan. Then more money blowing up roads in Afghanistan. We build schools then we blow them up again.  Then we spend more money rebuilding all of them.  Sometimes we blow them up, sometimes someone else blows them up. Then we always go back and rebuild them. What about rebuilding our country. Sounds like a practical idea but of course, the bill is blocked.

Rand Paul is also waging another war against endless wars.

He’s trying to repeal the 16-year-old Authorization for the use of Military Force (AUMF) which passed shortly after 9/11. It has allowed U.S. Presidents to declare war without Congressional approval. It has permitted the bombing of several countries including Somalia, Syria, and Yemen.

It also allowed the legal justification for the U.S. President to assassinate a U.S. citizen. It has been used to launch 37 military interventions in 14 different countries. Rand Paul is forcing a debate on this crucial issue almost standing alone. It would have passed if it wasn’t for his protest. He is bringing up vital points like the fact that there’s hypocrisy on both sides here. The anti-war left is no longer demanding the end of wars.

If you still believe in the political system, he has vowed to continue this protest. Most interestingly the only significant press he’s getting from this protest is from the online community. The mainstream media, of course, remains silent.

This is an important issue to me because if it weren’t for the AUMF, the president wouldn’t be able to bomb and kill anyone he wants at any time without congressional approval.

This law that Rand Paul wants to repeal has changed the landscape of not only Presidential powers but shaped international world events. This has been going on since 9/11 when Ron Paul former Congressman and Presidential candidate pointed out that 9/11 was used as a justification for passing the Patriot Act. He noted that the extensive bill was written many years before the attacks occurred. 9/11 just provided an opportunity to implement the police state.

That one event 9/11 introduced the AUMF and the Patriot Act. This started the current horrible foreign policy that still persists.

Many scholars, whistleblowers, professors, and experts say the government story about 9/11 does not add up. They say that it is bankrupting this country. Today almost every penny of our income tax goes to supposed defense spending. Over eighty percent of the money you give to the U.S. federal government goes directly towards the war industry and the security industry. They are setting up a surveillance state that is being turned and used against you the American citizen. As Edward Snowden even said don’t fear Trump, be afraid of the surveillance state.

With all of that happening the United States federal debt has just surpassed 20 trillion dollars. In just one day the debt jumped over 317 billion dollars after President Trump signed a new spending and debt limit deal.  This will keep the government afloat until December.

We are being bankrupted and are robbing our children’s future. We will be in servitude because of this debt all because of these meaningless wars that have been raging on for over 16 years now. Which is what the majority of our taxes are spent on. Yet still put us into bigger deficit while the United States cozies up to despotic nations. Nations like Saudi Arabia and Israel where we all commit horrible foreign policy decisions together.

The same Saudi Arabia that appears complicit and implicated with 9/11 along with American intelligence and Israeli intelligence. We’ve been telling you about this unholy alliance between Israel, Saudi Arabia, and the United States for a very long time.

It’s been pretty much-made official with this latest breaking news of the Saudi Crown Prince having a secret visit to Israel. This in spite fo the fact that Saudi Arabia officially does not recognize the Jewish state.

The two countries supposedly do not have any diplomatic relations. This is not a surprise for me because for years now we’ve been documenting and telling you how Saudi Arabia, Israel, and the U.S. have not only had a common enemy with Iran but actively finance rebel groups.  With the purpose of getting rid of the Iranian linked Syrian government and Bashar al-Assad.

These nations supported the rebel groups inside of Syria knowingly. They knew they were creating radical Islamic terrorists and helped the rise of al-Nusra and ISIS. All for their greater geopolitical goal of isolating Iran. These three countries see as Iran and Syria as their common enemy. We’ve been telling you this for some years now. We’ve been accused of being fake news and conspiracy theorists, but now we’re being vindicated. Recently a top Israeli general just came out and admitted the greater truth behind Israel wanting a war with Iran. A general tasked with writing his country’s defense policy has admitted that Israel cannot take on Iran’s military alone if that day ever comes. He admitted for Israel that terror groups like ISIS continue to be a minimal threat and instead Israel’s main focus tends to remain enveloped in an obsession with Iran.

Currently, Iranian backed militants are taking strategic areas of Syrian territory and may ultimately set up shop permanently on Israel’s border.

This led up to the events that we were talking about on this YouTube channel with Israeli Prime Minister meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin.

When those talks failed, Donald Trump’s sent Jared Kushner to Israel. We told you to look out for a very strong Israeli move. Israel went out and attacked Syrian government forces, and now they’re colluding with Saudi Arabia even on a bigger level over the future of Syria. A Syria which is strongly influenced by Iran, China and Russia. That’s why this Israeli general said: “we can achieve a decisive victory over Hezbollah, and we don’t need help from a single American soldier. However, we cannot fight Iran alone.” He also said, “I consider future cooperation with the U.S. much more important than anything we’ve had in the past.”

That is why we’re about to see the United States and Russia come face-to-face in Syria. That is why US President Donald Trump has stated that the US will declare Iran non-compliant with its nuclear deal. Even though the nuclear watchdog chief even stated that Iran is playing by the rules. We are going to be keeping a very close eye on this situation on this independent news channel.

In other potentially disastrous war news, more sanctions were passed on North Korea. This has caused them to down on threats against the United States.

There are also massive demonstrations happening in Spain right now. Hundreds of thousands of people marching in the streets for a Catalan national day. The people of Catalonia are calling for a break from the Spanish government.

The Catalonians are declaring their desire to vote for independence on October 1st, 2017. This is an event which I’m personally thinking attending myself and covering from the ground.

If you’re interested in that, let me know. That is the news for today. I hope you guys enjoyed this broadcast if you found it informative please share it with your friends and family members.

Don’t forget to vote with your dollar. The only thing keeping this independent nonpartisan media organization working is you. Through your help and your donations. Visit wearechange.org/donate

Thank you so much for allowing me to do this job for you. I love you guys very much stay tuned for more content here on WeAreChange.

Patreon https://www.patreon.com/WeAreChange

We gratefully accept Bitcoin too: 12HdLgeeuA87t2JU8m4tbRo247Yj5u2TVP

Donate on our site: https://wearechange.org/donate

FOLLOW WE ARE CHANGE ON SOCIAL MEDIA

SnapChat: LukeWeAreChange

Facebook: https://facebook.com/LukeWeAreChange

Twitter: https://twitter.com/Lukewearechange

Instagram: http://instagram.com/lukewearechange

Steemit: @lukewearechange

WE ARE CHANGE MERCHANDISE

Rep WeAreChange merch proudly: https://wearechange.org/store

The post A Ted Cruz Twitter Explanation, Rand Paul Summons His Father In Senate appeared first on We Are Change.

After the election of Donald Trump to the presidency, many people were excited to learn of the nomination of Judge Neil Gorsuch.

Democrats secured enough votes to initially block Gorsuch’s nomination. However, Republicans have responded by setting a new precedent (or using the ‘nuclear option’) which allowed a Supreme Court nomination with a 51-vote majority. Gorsuch was confirmed on Friday by the Senate with a 54-45 vote.

A similar action had been done before by Democrats in 2013 to approve Obama-era nominations.

Rumors had previously circulated that the Republicans wouldn’t use the so-called nuclear option, but it seems that those rumors were put to rest Thursday when the rules were changed to allow a majority vote to confirm a Supreme Court Justice. This new precedent will have far-reaching effects in the future, meaning that whichever party holds the majority in the Senate will effectively control whether or not a new Supreme Court Justice is confirmed from now on.

The fight to confirm Gorsuch as a Supreme Court judge has not been won easily. After nearly 20 hours of hearings over the course of three days last week, Gorsuch answered question after question to the Judiciary Committee. During this time, we learned quite a bit about the judge Gorsuch would be.

Things We Learned About Gorsuch

For starters, Gorsuch should not expect to have any sort of privacy after a handful of his e-mails were published. In these e-mails, we can find a few things that stick out. For starters, it seems that Gorsuch supports the actions at Guantanamo Bay after a visit there, saying that “being able to see first hand all that you have managed to accomplish with such a difficult and sensitive mission makes my job of helping explain and defend it before the courts all the easier” in a letter that was sent to two military officials.

Furthermore, it seems that Gorsuch supported the use of torture under the Bush administration. According to a testimony by Elisa Massimino during Gorsuch’s hearing, she illustrated that Gorsuch helped undermine independent judicial review by drafting an amendment to the Detainee Treatment Act which would prohibit federal courts to hear the claims of prisoners at Guantanamo Bay.

After Congress acted to ban torture of detainees, Gorsuch seemed to think that his colleagues in the White House would “need cheering up.” In an e-mail Gorsuch sent to Brett Gerry after the passage of the Detainee Treatment Act, which prohibits “cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment or punishment,” Gorsuch referenced a CBS News article which stated that the habeas corpus rights of detainees at Guantanamo would still be taken away because of the Graham amendment of the bill. He thought this would cheer up his friends in the White House, saying it was the “Administration’s victory”

Gorsuch also supported President Bush’s surveillance program. In several speeches that he drafted for other political leaders, we can get a taste of how Gorsuch was able to morally make this conclusion. It seems that since other Presidents like Clinton, Lincoln, and Roosevelt conducted warrantless surveillance, Gorsuch accordingly justified Bush’s surveillance program. As he wrote:

“Every court and every President throughout our history to decide the question has agreed that the Commander in Chief may conduct secret searches of enemy communications in this country without the prior approval of the other co-equal branches.”

In other words, according to a speech Gorsuch drafted for an Attorney General, the fourth amendment and habeas corpus rights don’t apply to anybody who is deemed as an ‘enemy.’ In a time when U.S. citizens are added to a federal kill list, it might be time to question what an enemy is, and what an enemy isn’t.

Regardless, one thing that Gorsuch seems to excel with is harboring an open-mind and looking at things from a bigger picture. During his opening speech on the second day of his hearings, Gorsuch said:

“putting on a robe doesn’t make me any smarter… Putting on a robe reminds us that it’s time to lose our egos and open our minds. It serves, too, as a reminder of the modest station we judges are meant to occupy in a democracy.”

As the Senate voted to confirm Trump’s Supreme Court nominee, let’s stay optimistic that the Neil Gorsuch we have evidence of (supporting torture, detainment, suspension of habeas corpus to detainees, and so on) doesn’t match with Judge Neil Gorsuch, the Supreme Court Justice who needs to uphold the amendments of the Constitution.

An excellent judge is one who is willing to make impartial judgments in the name of liberty and justice. An impartial judge is one who doesn’t make decisions based on party politics.

Which kind of judge will Justice Gorsuch be? Time will tell.

The post Gorsuch Confirmed In Senate: What We Learned About Him During His Hearings appeared first on We Are Change.

While the bill has passed the state legislature’s Judiciary Committee, it will now be voted on by the state’s House of Representatives.

In response to this bill, David McGuire, Executive Director for the Connecticut charter of the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), was in an uproar, saying: “We’re not in warfare here… There’s a level of separation that makes it almost video game like where they’re detached from the actual situation.”

McGuire and other advocates are worried about the potential misuse of these drones by police officers. Of course, it is not the use of drones which is controversial here, it is the fact that these drones might have lethal weapons attached to them.

As we can see from the Federal Aviation Administration guidelines, drones are popular among Americans and can be safely used by citizens when you require certain credentials and follow certain rules.

Arguments On Both Sides

In spite of the potential benefits that police enforcement claim can come from this bill, those who oppose it are more concerned with the evil that could be born from it. As the Bureau of Investigative Journalism notes, a fifth of those dead from weaponized drone attacks overseas have been innocent bystanders, which brings the safety and efficiency of these weapons into question, especially if they are to be used on the streets of the US.

With the recent controversy of police brutality over the years, as well as the influence of the #blacklivesmatter movement, it is no wonder that Connecticut NAACP President Scot Esdaile is worried that police will misuse these drones, stating that: “We have huge concerns that they would use this new technology to abuse our communities.”

Politicians who have approved the bill so far seem to harbor an optimistic view as to how these drones will be used. Senator John Kissel, a member of the Connecticut Judiciary Committee, which approved the bill, told Fox 5 that:

“Obviously this is for very limited circumstances… We can certainly envision some incident on some campus or someplace where someone is a rogue shooter or someone was kidnapped and you try to blow out a tire.”

It seems that both sides of this issue are speculating as to whether or not these drones will be good for the community. The actuality of what legalizing weaponized drones will mean for police use, and potential abuse, is what remains in question.

To date, five states have laws which prohibit anyone from using a weaponized drone, including Nevada, North Carolina, Oregon, Vermont, and Wisconsin. And while the state of North Dakota allows police to use weaponized drones, they are, however, subject to using “less than lethal” weapons such as tear gas, tasers, rubber bullets, and pepper spray.

Interestingly, the strategy used by Connecticut lawmakers in terms of their attempt to be able to pass such legislation mirrors that of North Dakota. In other words, the bill that was passed in North Dakota also started off as a bill to ban all weaponized drones and was then amended at the last minute by lawmakers so as to make an exemption for police. The difference, however, is that in the case of Connecticut, lawmakers aren’t just attempting to make an exemption for police to use weaponized drones, but to also allow for the use of lethal weaponry.

What do you think? Should we trust the integrity of Connecticut’s police officers, or should we try and stop them from using weaponized drones?

The post Connecticut Lawmakers Want Weaponized Drones For Local Police Use appeared first on We Are Change.

[RELATED: CONGRESSMAN PETER KING: PRESIDENTIAL KILL LIST ‘TOTALLY CONSTITUTIONAL’]

The alleged ‘Kill List’ had once been put down by some officials in Washington, but it seems that now this topic is widely known and accepted as reality. Ex-CIA director said in 2012 that only “very most senior officials” mark people for death. The New York Times furthermore reported five years ago on how this process works:

“Every week or so, more than 100 members of the government’s sprawling national security apparatus gather, by secure video teleconference, to pore over terrorist suspects’ biographies and recommend to the president who should be the next to die.”

Journalists sue Trump over 'kill list' designations: report https://t.co/FyJXbN6PEF

— WikiLeaks (@wikileaks) March 31, 2017

When Trump was elected into office, one of the first things he did was give the CIA power to conduct drone strikes, making it easier for the agency to kill suspected ‘terrorists.’

Now, two journalists placed on the kill list by the Obama administration are afraid for their lives, believing that they will be one of the next names called as drone bombings continue. As the lawsuit states, neither of these men claim to be involved with any sort of militant or terrorist activity, and both of them are journalists who put themselves in questionable situations to report the facts.

These men, Ahmad Zaidan and Bilal Kareem, are now hoping that U.S. courts can help them receive the peace of mind that they won’t be killed by the U.S. government. Questionable circumstances alongside algorithms used to identify terrorists are what they claim have caused them to be included on the kill list.

For example, Zaidan is a Syrian and Pakistani journalist who works for Al Jazeera and interviewed Osama Bin Laden on multiple occasions, once in the presence of several alleged senior al-Qaeda officials. The lawsuit states that “Zaidan regularly investigates and reports on terrorism and its causes,” painting the picture of an innocent civilian who wants to tackle the issue of terrorism.

Kareem, on the other hand, is a U.S. citizen who has worked for several mainstream media outlets, including CNN, BBC, and also Al Jazeera. In 2012, he traveled to Syria to report on the situation there. The lawsuit says the “during the past year, Kareem has narrowly avoided being killed by five separate air strikes, at least one of which was carried out by a drone.” Detailed descriptions of these alleged failed attacks can be seen in the lawsuit.

Kareem and Zaidan seek a ruling that their inclusion on the kill list was the result of “arbitrary and capricious agency action,” and/or a statement that it is unconstitutional, a chance to challenge their inclusion on the kill list, and/or be removed from the list altogether.

The post Two Journalists Sue Trump, Seek To Be Removed From Obama’s Federal Kill List appeared first on We Are Change.