WIKILEAKS: Suggest Sanders BLACKMAILED & Threatened By Robby Mook

Wikileaks emails have shaken the very fabric of the political spectrum to the core. We have seen Clinton campaign collusion between the media, DNC, DOJ, DOS, etc. But now everyone’s fears that Bernie Sanders was potentially a plant, blackmailed or threatened, may have been confirmed in an email from 2015.

beaten-bernie

In an email exchange from Robby Mook (re47@hillaryclinton.com) to John Podesta (john.podesta@gmail.com) on May,26,2015, Mook forwarded an email from Christina Reynolds to the rest of the Clinton camp. In the message, she sad Sanders went after HRC and WJC on wealth including using the word hustle. She then goes on to say that she followed up with Brad (potentially DNC CFO Brad Marshall who resigned)  and “the only thing that they’ve pushed is from the attached docs trying to get reporters to write that HRC and Bernie are actually in the same place.” Likely Referring to political stances now exposed to be a lie by Wikileaks because of Hillary’s private and public opinion.

Following up on our call on Friday, just wanted to give some updates and flag that Bernie went after HRC and WJC on wealth (including using the word “hustle.) I followed up with Brad. The only thing they’ve pushed is from the attached docs—trying to get reporters to write that HRC and Bernie are actually in the same place. They are happy for any suggestions, but were not planning on making any big attacks around the announcement.

Mook then wrote, “This isn’t in keeping w the agreement. Since we clearly have some leverage, would be good to flag this for him. I could send a signal via Welch–or did you establish a direct line w him?”

What agreement is Robby Mook talking about? What does he mean by “send a signal via Welch.” Is Robby Mook referring to Vermont representative Peter Welch?

Even if Mook was talking about Brad Marshall DNC CFO when he said “This isn’t in keeping w the agreement let me send a signal via welch” that would expose that not only the Clinton campaign but the DNC was feeding reporters to write stories. However this possibility quickly falls apart since earlier this year Guccifer 2 revealed the DNC rigged the primary against Sanders. So Mook wouldn’t need to send a signal to the DNC CFO they were already well connected from the beginning.

The alternative is that it’s a different Welch and different Brad and that Mook wasn’t talking about Sanders but was talking about Brad. However, the email chain would suggest that it’s Sanders who Mook is referring to because deeper down the string of emails, there are two links forwarded from Colin Campbell (Business Insider Journalist) to Clinton staffer Josh Schwerin. One to a story that is criticized by the Clinton campaign in which Sanders bashes Hillary and the other to a story about Hillary Clinton’s campaign selling pants suits.

But it doesn’t end there. In the attachments that Christina Reynolds remarked in the email under a section in the document called “Personal Comments Praise” are positive comments by Senator Sanders about Hillary Clinton.

I then decided to do some digging through CNBC’s reporter list and contributor list from 2015 and found no one named Brad worked there in July 2015. I looked at July, 2015 because no earlier date was available from archive.org.

I did the same for Business insider looking for a reporter named Brad seeing as Wikileaks has already previously exposed the close connection between the media and Clinton campaign. Thinking that I could debunk the claim that Bernie Sanders was a potential plant and Robbie Mook was talking about Brad at business insider since CNBC didn’t have anyone named Brad who worked there. I found that business insider did not have an entry at all for 2015, either available on archive.org.

Alternatively, Mook might have been referring to another reporter not apart of CNBC or Business Insider named Brad. However the next comment, “I could send a signal via Welch” doesn’t make sense. Seeing as how connected the campaign was to the media, why would Mook need to send a signal?

Another alternative pointed out by a twitter user – @elizabethcaffey is that the email may be referring to “sending a signal” to Correct The Record, President Brad Woodhouse, who worked with and knew Peter Welsh. But the conflict here is that Correct The Record was started by long time Clinton shill David Brock so why would Mook need to “send a signal” to Brad Woodhouse at Correct The Record when David Brock founded the organization?

It’s also worth noting that earlier in the year it was revealed that the Sanders campaign sold out to the Hillary Clinton’s campaign for a private jet towards the end of the campaign run.

Whatever the case may be, this email is deeply disturbing, and if the two people mentioned are Peter Welch and DNC CFO Brad Marshall or Brad Woodhouse, things just got a lot more crazier if that’s even at all possible with recent Wikileaks emails revealing Podesta talking about satanic occult spirit cooking. In either case, whether it’s staging a false story with reporters or politically threatening or physically threatening Bernie Sanders it’s an FEC violation.

What did Robby Mafia Mook mean by “since we clearly have some leverage?” Was the “leverage” Blackmail? threats? Maybe that explains Bernie’s cut on his face later on during the DNC. With such a wild election cycle absolutely nothing would surprise me anymore. Do you feel the Bern?

“The mafia never separates.”

~Robby Mook

 

 

 

 

avatar
I am an Activist a writer a blogger and an investigative journalist writing for (www.wearechange.org)

A Radio host of the Blog-talk Radio Series:
#SmokeScreenDisclosure

My Sources are everywhere..
Enemy of the New World Order.

Pin It on Pinterest

Share This

Subscribe To Our Newsletter

Join our mailing list to receive the latest news and updates from our team.

You have Successfully Subscribed!