The last time Snopes co-founder David Mikkelson made headlines, he’d allegedly embezzled $98,000, dropped weight, left his health-challenged co-founder wife, and married an actual whore.
Five years later, and Mikkelson’s just been suspended by Snopes after BuzzFeed uncovered massive plagiarism – including instructing other Snopes writers to ‘cut-and-paste’ mainstream breaking news stories without attribution, and then alter them after the fact.
In total, Mikkelson ‘wrote and published 54 articles with plagiarized material,’ under his own name as well as a pseudonym, and the Snopes byline. In addition, an internal review by the ‘fact-checking’ company identified 140 articles with possible problems.
Snopes VP of Editorial and Managing Editor Doreen Marchionni suspended Mikkelson from editorial duties pending “a comprehensive internal investigation.” He remains an officer and a 50% shareholder of the company.
“Let us be clear: Plagiarism undermines our mission and values, full stop,” Marchionni added [ZH: and then not full-stopping]. “It has no place in any context within this organization.” –BuzzFeed
Former Snopes managing editor Brook Binkowski told BuzzFeed: “He used to write about topics he knew would get him hate mail under that assumed name. Plus it made it appear he had more staff than he had.”
“He would instruct us to copy text from other sites, post them verbatim so that it looked like we were fast and could scoop up traffic, and then change the story in real time. I hated it and wouldn’t tell any of the staff to do it, but he did it all the time,” she added.
In one Slack message from January 2016, Mikkelson detailed his strategy for copying and then quickly rewriting articles after publishing. “Usually when a hot real news story breaks (such as a celebrity death), I just find a wire service or other news story about it and publish it on the site verbatim to quickly get a page up. Once that’s done, then I quickly start editing the page to reword it and add material from other sources to make it not plagiarized,” he wrote.
In two emails from 2014 and 2015, Mikkelson told staff to “pop over to one of our competitor sites (urbanlegends.com or hoaxslayer.com), pick something out that they’ve recently published that we haven’t covered,” and “rewrite it just enough to avoid copyright infringement.” -BuzzFeed
According to two other former employees, “taking credit for other people’s work” was “part of his model.”
Mikkelson’s excuse? He’s not a trained journalist.
“I didn’t come from a journalism background,: he said in a statement. “I wasn’t used to doing news aggregation. A number of times I crossed the line to where it was copyright infringement. I own that.”
In response to Mikkelson’s transgressions, Snopes staff issued a letter condemning their boss (via BuzzFeed):
We, the writers of Snopes, feel it is incumbent upon us to clearly and publicly acknowledge that Buzzfeed has discovered incontrovertible evidence that the co-founder and CEO of Snopes, David Mikkelson, has written and published multiple articles which contained sentences taken from other sources without proper attribution. We strongly condemn these poor journalistic practices. No writer participated in this behavior, nor did any editors — Doreen Marchionni, Camille Knox, and David Emery — support or encourage these practices. We have all been held to very high journalistic standards, both by our editors and by our audience. Although none of us was to blame for the actions of Snopes’ co-founder, we empathize with the journalists whose work was appropriated. This simply should never have happened.
Under the leadership and guidance of Marchionni, Knox, and Emery, we work hard every day to uphold the highest possible journalistic and ethical standards, and we believe our fact checks, original reporting and investigative work are a testament to those high standards. We are proud of our editors and proud of the work we do.
—Alex Kasprak, Dan Evon, Jessica Lee, Nur Ibrahim , Jordan Liles, Madison Dapcevich, Dan Mac Guill, Bethania Palma
And these guys were Facebook ‘fact checkers’ until 2019.
Meanwhile, Snopes raised $1.7 million just a few weeks ago to fight a series of lawsuits from a tech vendor. What a mess.
Republished from ZeroHedge.com with permission