On October 10, Wikileaks released part two of their email dump from Clinton campaign chair John Podesta.
The second batch has revealed that current DNC chair Donna Brazile, when working as a DNC vice chair, forwarded to the Clinton campaign an email obtained from the rival Bernie Sanders campaign announcing a Twitter storm. “FYI,” Brazile wrote to the Clinton staff forwarding the email.
“Thank you for the heads up on this Donna,” replied Clinton campaign spokesperson, Adrienne Elrod.
In addition to outing another DNC official as corrupt and neglecting to do her job fairly and unbiased, other emails leaked reveal further collusion between the mainstream media and the Clinton Campaign.
In one email received by Clinton donor Haim Saban and forwarded to Clinton staff, the friendly to Clinton moderators in the early March 2016 Democratic primary debate were praised.
“Haim, I just wanted to tell you that I thought the moderators for last nights Debate were excellent. They were thoughtful, tough and incisive. I thought it made Hilary appear direct and strong in her resolve. I felt it advanced our candidate. Thanks for Univision,”
~Rob Friedman, former co-chair of the Motion Picture Group.
Another email discusses planting a favorable Clinton story in The New York Times, manipulating voters’ opinions on Hillary Clinton.
“NYT heroine. Should she call her today?” Podesta wrote to other Clinton campaign staffers. “I do think it’s a great idea! We can make it happen,” Huma Abedin, said in an email.
Then there are the emails that expose corruption such as an email from Marc Elias of the law firm Perkins Coie, in which he outlined “legal tricks” to circumvent campaign finance laws to raise money together with Super PACs.
Then there’s the email of Clinton Campaign manager Robby Mook of the “Mook Mafia” expressing frustration that DNC Chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz hired a Convention CEO without consulting the Clinton campaign first. This suggests that the Clinton campaign had an influence on the DNC the entire time, a clear violation of the FEC (Federal Election Commission) rules.
Finally we have leaked emails that show Hillary Clinton saying “Saudi Arabia and Qatar are funding ISIS.”
“While this military/para-military operation is moving forward, we need to use our diplomatic and more traditional intelligence assets to bring pressure on the governments of Qatar and Saudi Arabia, which are providing clandestine financial and logistic support to ISIL and other radical Sunni groups in the region,” Hillary Clinton wrote.
An obvious conflict of interest – all the money that Saudi Arabia and Qatar have given to Hillary Clinton’s Clinton Foundation. If she knowingly knew that Saudi Arabia and Qatar were funding ISIS and she still took money from them, what does that say about her own ethics and judgment? In fact she is basically supporting terrorism by taking money when she knows that the Saudis and Qatar are providing material support for the Islamic State.
Qatar has given an estimated $5 million to the Clinton Foundation and Saudi Arabia has donated at least $25 million dollars to the Foundation. Will she be forced to denounce support for the two countries or will she act like this leak never happened? No matter what she does eventually it’s all going to catch up to her.
Sign up on lukeunfiltered.com or to check out our store on thebestpoliticalshirts.com.