The Summer of Chaos, as George Soros called it, is exploding all over the world. Terrorism in Europe, police shootings in the U.S., and clues of possible false flags spread over the whole mess. So what is fueling this global manifestation of rage?
CONSTANT AND SUSTAINED OPPRESSION BY WESTERN GOVERNMENTS HAS CREATED CALLS FOR RETRIBUTION AGAINST THE GLOBAL ELITE’S POWER STRUCTURES
For example, the U.S. government has been dominated by fractional groups of powerful elites, whose separate yet consolidated wealth has lorded over, dominated, subjugated and aimed to control the minds and bodies of people around the world.
The vast majority of the world is tired of American “democratic” intervention. In South American, Asia, Africa, and the Middle East, people have for decades felt the sting of American military imperialism. The assassinations of legitimately elected leaders like Iran’s Mohammed Mossadegh and Panama’s Omar Torrijos has created worldwide perception of the U.S. as a militaristic overlord. Many Western nations, especially U.S. allies in NATO, are similarly viewed as evil oppressors.
The U.S. has bombed over 20 different countries since World War 2, and has been involved in the covert overthrows of countless others. Here is a list of countries the USA has bombed since the end of World War II.
Ron Paul is the most prominent U.S. politician who has given an honest telling of this truth. Ron Paul was asked if he really wants the troops to come home, and whether that is really a Republican position.
“Well,” he said, “I think the party has lost its way, because the conservative wing of the Republican Party always advocated a non-interventionist foreign policy. Senator Robert Taft didn’t even want to be in NATO. George Bush won the election in the year 2000 campaigning on a humble foreign policy –no nation-building, no policing of the world. Republicans were elected to end the Korean War. The Republicans were elected to end the Vietnam War. There’s a strong tradition of being anti-war in the Republican party. It is the constitutional position. It is the advice of the Founders to follow a non-interventionist foreign policy, stay out of entangling alliances, be friends with countries, negotiate and talk with them and trade with them.”
He was then asked if 9-11 changed anything. He responded that US foreign policy was a “major contributing factor. Have you ever read the reasons they attacked us? They attacked us because we’ve been over there; we’ve been bombing Iraq for 10 years. We’ve been in the Middle East –I think Reagan was right. We don’t understand the irrationality of Middle Eastern politics. So right now we’re building an embassy in Iraq that’s bigger than the Vatican. We’re building 14 permanent bases. What would we say here if China was doing this in our country or in the Gulf of Mexico? We would be objecting. We need to look at what we do from the perspective of what would happen if somebody else did it to us. “
You reap what you sow as they say, and American Imperialism has dominated half of the globe with near impunity for far too long.
2. The Rise Of Non-State Powers viewed as a threat to National Security and Western Hegemony.
Power is not exclusive, it does not discriminate against anyone although those who are in power often use it as a tool for discrimination. The elite Archon class has historically pitted small groups against each other but eventually, as through a process of elimination every so often factions will arise and separate themselves from the others . This is what we saw with Marcus Garvey and the Harlem Resonance,or MOVE, the Philadelphia-based Black liberation movement that was dedicated to a back-to-nature lifestyle. Anti-capitalist, Anarchist, Socialists, Libertarians, the Nation of Islam, Black Panthers, Occupy Wall Street, and other small unified and independent groups are seen as a threat by the the U.S. government to its monopoly on allegiance from its citizens. The problem is that many of these organizations are grass roots, meaning they were formed right here in America as opposition to the strength of the federal government. The system at large desires very much to depress and subdue it’s own population. The government fears eventually those subjugated groups will unite and finally defeat the oppressor, as was seen in the United States war for Independence.
In Federalist No. 10 James Madison wrote “The Utility of the Union as a Safeguard Against Domestic Faction and Insurrection” , addressing the question of how to guard against “factions“, or groups of citizens, with interests contrary to the rights of others or the interests of the whole community. Madison saw factions as inevitable due to the nature of man and long as men hold differing opinions, have differing amounts of wealth, and own differing amount of property, they will continue to form alliances with people who are most similar to them and they will sometimes work against the public interest, and infringe upon the rights of others. Thus, he questions how to guard against those dangers.
The suppression of minority groups, seemingly built in to the fabric of the U.S., only leads to rage.
3. ISLAM AND THE RISE OF POLITICAL JIHAD.
Radical Islam is not what you think it is. Political terrorism has been used historically by tyrants of all races as a weapon of fear, and the main reason that Islam today has been painted as the capricious religious zealot that kills without motive other then hate is the creation of a long standing geopolitical operation designed to pit humanity against itself.
Long before 9/11 there were plans calling for the “balkanization of the middle east“. The wars in the middle east were planned ahead of time, according to retired army general Wesley Clark, who in 2011 confessed to the public that just after September 11, 2001 he was informed while visiting the Pentagon that the neocon cabal that was the Bush administration planned to take out seven countries in five years, starting with Iraq, and then Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and, finishing off, with Iran. An email would later emerge showing that George W. Bush and then Prime Minister of the United Kingdom Tony Blair colluded together a full year before the war in Iraq began. Then in 2014 the award-winning investigative journalist Seymour Hersh made headlines when he showed the CIA was giving weapons and other military supplies to ISIS, in order to overthrow Muammar Gaddafi, then the president of Libya. Hersh said in a highly publicized article:
A highly classified annex to the report, not made public … pertained to the rat line. By the terms of the agreement, funding [for the rebel group now known as ISIS] came from Turkey, as well as Saudi Arabia and Qatar; the CIA, with the support of MI6, was responsible for getting arms into Syria. The annex didn’t tell the whole story of what happened in Benghazi before the attack, nor did it explain why the American consulate was attacked. ‘The consulate’s only mission was to provide cover for the moving of arms,’ the former intelligence official, who has read the annex, said. ‘It had no real political role.’
What the public at large does not know is that not only was the U.S. giving weapons to the Islamic State so called ‘moderate Rebel groups, and Mexican drug cartels, but the CIA also co-oped the formations of radical Islamic fighters back in the 1970s and was actively involved along with Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Turkey, and other gulf states in the creation and exploration of the extreme version of Wahhabi fundamentalism that is nothing but an extreme distortion of Islam. Zbigniew Brzezinski, a political scientist and geo-political strategist, who served as a counselor to President Lyndon B. Johnson from 1966–68 and was President Jimmy Carter’s National Security adviser from 1977–81, was key in the creation of the Mujahideen, which literally translates to “ones engaged in Jihad”. In English usage, it mostly refers to the Afghanistan Guerilla style fighters of the Soviet war in Afghanistan. The Mujahideen were funded and sponsored by the United States and became Al Qaeda, the group which inspired the multiple jihadist organizations that we see around the world today.
The former director of the CIA, Robert Gates, stated in his memoirs [“From the Shadows“], that American intelligence services began to aid the Mujahadeen in Afghanistan 6 months before the Soviet intervention. In this period you were the national security adviser to President Carter. You therefore played a role in this affair. Is that correct?
Brzezinski: Yes. According to the official version of history, CIA aid to the Mujahideen began during 1980, that is to say, after the Soviet army invaded Afghanistan, 24 Dec 1979. But the reality, secretly guarded until now, is completely otherwise: Indeed, it was July 3, 1979 that President Carter signed the first directive for secret aid to the opponents of the pro-Soviet regime in Kabul. And that very day, I wrote a note to the president in which I explained to him that in my opinion this aid was going to induce a Soviet military intervention.
Operation Cyclone was the code name for the United States Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) program to arm and finance the Afghan mujahideen.
4) Zionism, Mossad, and The Israeli Shadow Government
Until recently the general public was unaware of both the size and scope of Zionist power. Many people today confuse the radical aspects of the Zionist ideology with Judaism, however Zionism is primarily a Christian Protestant enterprise that has little to do with Judaism.“Zionists” are a group of people that believe Jews must be in control of the historical land of Israel, and are willing to use unlimited violence, theft, and subversion to achieve this goal. This is not an opinion – this is a restatement of many Zionist figureheads’ own words.
“We must use terror, assassination, intimidation, land confiscation, and the cutting of all social services to rid the Galilee of its Arab population.” ~Yisrael Koenig, The Koenig Memorandum.
The state of Israel was created by using terrorism. The Jewish insurgency in Mandatory Palestine involved paramilitary actions carried out by Jewish underground groups against the British forces and officials in Palestine between 1939 and the establishment of the State of Israel in May 1948. During this time the world saw and recognized the first acts of False Flag terrorism. Disguised as Arabs, the Irgun [a militant Zionist faction] planted a bomb in the basement of the main building of the King David hotel, whose southern wing housed the Mandate Secretariat and a few offices of the British military headquarters. The explosion caused the collapse of the western half of the southern wing of the hotel.
Enders Walter and Todd Sandler theorized in a 2006 book on the political economy of terrorism that “it provided a model for the terrorist bombings”. In another 2006 book, Gus Martin wrote that the attack is one of the best historical examples of successful terrorism, it having yielded, according to him, everything that the Irgun had wanted.
In July 2006, the Menachem Begin Heritage Center organized a conference to mark the 60th anniversary of the bombing. The conference which was attended by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former members of the Irgun unveiled a plaque commemorating the bombing was unveiled, stating “For reasons known only to the British, the hotel was not evacuated.”
There are a dizzying number of crimes and offenses by Zionists that have been ignored by Wall Street owned media. The unprovoked attack of the USS Liberty by Israel, complete US political control by AIPAC, the suspicious assassination of Yitzhak Rabin (referred to as Israel’s JFK trying to make peace with Palestine) by a proud Zionist, the Golan Heights development and other continuing land grabs, the horrific human-rights-violations towards the Palestinians, the myth of the Iron Dome defense, MOSSAD’s involvement in the 9-11 attacks, and much more. But each one is deserving of an article (if not a book) by itself. This is simply an overview. If you want to go deeper, please check out the links provided and do your own research.
According to a historian at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem: “Israel thought that it was a smart ploy to push the Islamists against the Palestinian Liberation Organization (PLO).”
Rabbi Fischmann, member of the Jewish Agency for Palestine, declared in his testimony to the U.N. Special Committee of Enquiry on 9 July 1947: “The Promised Land extends from the River of Egypt up to the Euphrates, it includes parts of Syria and Lebanon.”
Divide and conquer: the oldest military tactic in the book.
Although many consider Zionism to be a Primarily a Jewish institution the majority of US Jews have never supported it.
Many of the clues in this summer’s attacks point a finger in the direction of the Mossad.
5. The Financial Elite’s Relentless Push For a Single World Government, often referred to as The New World Order.
The common theme between all these secretive groups and their globalist agenda is the conspiring to eventually rule the planet, through the creation of an authoritarian world government, one which will replace and have dominion over all the earths sovereign nation-states. The NWO is related to Zionism because according to the fundamental Zionists the world government will be run from Israel by a military Messiah.
In 1797 a Scottish physicist, mathematician , and professor of philosophy named John Robison FRSE published a book entitled Proofs of a Conspiracy in which he alleges a clandestine relationship between the Illuminati and Freemasons (the work’s full title was Proofs of a Conspiracy against all the Religions and Governments of Europe, carried on in the secret meetings of Freemasons, Illuminati and Reading Societies). The secret agent monk, Alexander Horn provided much of the material for Robison’s work. French priest Abbé Barruel independently developed similar views that the Illuminati had infiltrated Continental Freemasonry, leading to the excesses of the French Revolution. In 1798, the Reverend G. W. Snyder sent Robison’s book to George Washington for his thoughts on the subject in which he replied to him in a letter saying;
“It was not my intention to doubt that, the Doctrines of the Illuminati, and principles of Jacobinism had not spread in the United States. On the contrary, no one is more truly satisfied of this fact than I am. The idea that I meant to convey, was, that I did not believe that the Lodges of Free Masons in this Country had, as Societies, endeavored to propagate the diabolical tenets of the first, or pernicious principles of the latter (if they are susceptible of separation). That Individuals of them may have done it, or that the founder, or instrument employed to found, the Democratic Societies in the United States, may have had these objects; and actually had a separation of the People from their Government in view, is too evident to be questioned.
What the Elite Believe About the Messiah, and the History Behind It
In his book in his ‘The Thirteenth Tribe Arthur Koestler writes about the conversion to Judaism by the Khazar Kingdom –
“…was no doubt inspired by opportunistic motives – conceived as a cunning political maneuver – it brought in its wake cultural developments which could hardly have been foreseen by those who started it.”
In the famous ‘Khazar Correspondence‘ between Hasdai bar Isaak of Spain and the Khazarian King Joseph, the following was written:
“I questioned them about it and they replied that it was true, and that the name of the kingdom is al – Khazar.”
The concluding passage, says Koestler, reads as follows:
“I feel the urge to know the truth, whether there is really a place on this earth where harassed Israel can rule itself, where it is subject to no body. If I were to know that this is indeed the case, I would not hesitate to forsake all honors, to resign my high office, to abandon my family, and travel over mountains and plains, over land and water, until I arrive at the place where my Lord, the [Jewish] King rules… And I also have one more request: to be informed whether you have any knowledge of [the possible date] of the Final Miracle [the coming of the Messiah] which, wandering from country to country, we are awaiting. Dishonored and humiliated in our dispersion, we have to listen in silence to those who say: ‘Every nation has its own land and you alone possess not even a shadow of a country on this earth.'”
Koestler then observes:
“The beginning of the letter praises the happy lot of the Jews in Spain; the end breathes the bitterness of the exile, Zionist fervor and Messianic hope… these opposite attitudes have always co – existed in the divided hearts of Jews throughout their history.”
King Joseph’s reply, says Koestler, “proudly”, emphasizes that the Khazar Kingdom gives the lie that ‘the Sceptre of Judah has fallen from the Jews’ hands’ and ‘that there is no place on earth for a kingdom of their own’… Joseph then proceeds to provide a genealogy of his people. Though a fierce Jewish nationalist, proud of wielding the ‘Sceptre of Juda’, he cannot, and does not, claim for them Semitic descent; he traces their ancestry not to Shem, but to Noah’s third son Japheth; or more precisely to Japheth’s grandson, Togarma, the ancestor of all Turkish tribes.
‘We have found in the family register of our fathers’, Joseph asserts boldly, ‘that Togarma had ten sons, and the names of their offspring are as follows: Uigur, Dursu, Avars, Huns, Basilii, Tarniakh, Khazar, Zagora, Bulgars, Sabir. We are the sons of Khazar, the seventh…’ …the characteristic feature in this genealogical exercise is the amalgamation of Genesis with Turkish tribal tradition… It also throws a sidelight on the frequent description of the Khazars as the people of Magog.
According to Thomas Romer, a professor of Old Testament at the University of Lausanne, the U.S. “uses the Bible as an excuse for invading other countries.” He said that it was true of President George W. Bush in his deciding that the U.S. attack Iraq. For it appears that President Bush’s decision to go to war against Iraqi President Saddam Hussein was at least partly inspired by religious Zionism, by means of what Bush believed was contained in the book of Ezekiel. “Even for me, as a student who specializes in understanding Bible prophecy, this is a rather frightening scenario. I think George W. Bush’s understanding of Ezekiel 38-39, which I also believed for several years, contributed to him thinking he had been chosen by God in winning the close election for president against Al Gore in order to make an impact for God in the Middle East. Spreading democracy is one thing; but attacking a nation due to one’s understanding of Bible prophecy is quite another” writes Romer.
“Gog and Magog are at work in the Middle East, The biblical prophecies are being fulfilled. This confrontation is willed by God who wants this conflict to erase his people’s enemies before a new age begins.” said Bush, the 43rd President of the United States. Former French president Jacques Chirac claimed in late 2009 that Bush made these statements to him at some point prior the invasion of Iraq in March 2003 while “appealing to him as a Christian” and attempting to convince him to have France join the invasion. The Independent, 2 January 2010
What does Ezekiel 38-39 say? It says Gog will be allied with Persia [now Iran], Ethiopia, Put [now Libya], (v. 5) in invading the nation of Israel with many armies to wipe it off the map (v. 8), but that God will intervene and send a to save Israel . Obviously, this text has not been fulfilled and thus, for Christian Zionist it must still happen in the future.
In his speech, Toward a New World Order, delivered on September 11, 1990 during a joint session of the US Congress, President George H. W. Bush described his objectives for post-Cold War global governance in cooperation with post-Soviet states. He stated:
Until now, the world we’ve known has been a world divided—a world of barbed wire and concrete block, conflict and cold war. Now, we can see a new world coming into view. A world in which there is the very real prospect of a new world order. In the words of Winston Churchill, a “world order” in which “the principles of justice and fair play … protect the weak against the strong …” A world where the United Nations, freed from cold war stalemate, is poised to fulfill the historic vision of its founders. A world in which freedom and respect for human rights find a home among all nations.
The New York Times observed that progressives were denouncing this new world order as a rationalization of American imperial ambitions in the Middle East, while conservatives rejected any new security arrangements altogether and fulminated about any possibility of a UN revival. However, Chip Berlet, an American investigative reporter specializing in the study of right-wing movements in the US, writes:
When President Bush announced his new foreign policy would help build a New World Order, his phrasing surged through the Christian and secular hard right like an electric shock, since the phrase had been used to represent the dreaded collectivist One World Government for decades. Some Christians saw Bush as signaling the End Times betrayal by a world leader. Secular anticommunists saw a bold attempt to smash US sovereignty and impose a tyrannical collectivist system run by the United Nations.